面瘫患者舌下-面部吻合术后大脑可塑性的脑磁图研究

Q4 Neuroscience
Rémi Hervochon , Deborah Ziri , Guillaume Dupuch , Maximilien Chaumon , Claire Foirest , Denis Schwartz , Christophe Gitton , Nathalie George , Frédéric Tankere
{"title":"面瘫患者舌下-面部吻合术后大脑可塑性的脑磁图研究","authors":"Rémi Hervochon ,&nbsp;Deborah Ziri ,&nbsp;Guillaume Dupuch ,&nbsp;Maximilien Chaumon ,&nbsp;Claire Foirest ,&nbsp;Denis Schwartz ,&nbsp;Christophe Gitton ,&nbsp;Nathalie George ,&nbsp;Frédéric Tankere","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypoglosso-facial anastomosis (HFA) consists in suturing the proximal part of the hypoglossal nerve with the distal part of the facial nerve in patients with facial palsy. Axonal regrowth through the anastomosis makes it possible to restore facial motor skills, which become spontaneous after physiotherapy. This suggests cerebral plasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a pilot study to test this hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-one healthy volunteers (CTRL) and 12 patients after HFA performed 5 motor tasks with MEG and electromyographic recordings: eyelid closure, smile, tongue protraction, mastication and thumb flexion. For each task, we picked the location of the maximum source activity within the precentral gyrus. We calculated the distances between this location and the vertex for each task and a somatotopy index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was an interaction between the participant’s group and the task (F(4,124) = 4.07, p = 0.0039). In CTRL, the maximum source location was statistically different between smile and tongue tasks and between eyelid and tongue tasks (p &lt; 0.001). No such difference was observed in HFA (p = 1.000). 90.5 % of CTRL and 41.7 % of HFA showed a normal somatotopy (p = 0.0046).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In CTRL, the organization of the cortical motor areas was similar to that of Penfield’s motor Homunculus. In contrast, in HFA, eyelid closure, tongue protraction and smile areas were not significantly distinct. This supports the hypothesis of cerebral plasticity after HFA.</div><div>The Ethical Committee of Paris Idf VI approved the study (CPP Ouest 6-CPP975-HPS2).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral plasticity after hypoglosso-facial anastomosis in facial palsy: a magnetoencephalography study\",\"authors\":\"Rémi Hervochon ,&nbsp;Deborah Ziri ,&nbsp;Guillaume Dupuch ,&nbsp;Maximilien Chaumon ,&nbsp;Claire Foirest ,&nbsp;Denis Schwartz ,&nbsp;Christophe Gitton ,&nbsp;Nathalie George ,&nbsp;Frédéric Tankere\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypoglosso-facial anastomosis (HFA) consists in suturing the proximal part of the hypoglossal nerve with the distal part of the facial nerve in patients with facial palsy. Axonal regrowth through the anastomosis makes it possible to restore facial motor skills, which become spontaneous after physiotherapy. This suggests cerebral plasticity.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a pilot study to test this hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-one healthy volunteers (CTRL) and 12 patients after HFA performed 5 motor tasks with MEG and electromyographic recordings: eyelid closure, smile, tongue protraction, mastication and thumb flexion. For each task, we picked the location of the maximum source activity within the precentral gyrus. We calculated the distances between this location and the vertex for each task and a somatotopy index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was an interaction between the participant’s group and the task (F(4,124) = 4.07, p = 0.0039). In CTRL, the maximum source location was statistically different between smile and tongue tasks and between eyelid and tongue tasks (p &lt; 0.001). No such difference was observed in HFA (p = 1.000). 90.5 % of CTRL and 41.7 % of HFA showed a normal somatotopy (p = 0.0046).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In CTRL, the organization of the cortical motor areas was similar to that of Penfield’s motor Homunculus. In contrast, in HFA, eyelid closure, tongue protraction and smile areas were not significantly distinct. This supports the hypothesis of cerebral plasticity after HFA.</div><div>The Ethical Committee of Paris Idf VI approved the study (CPP Ouest 6-CPP975-HPS2).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956025000625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956025000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:面瘫患者舌下神经近端与面神经远端吻合是舌下神经吻合术。通过吻合的轴突再生使恢复面部运动技能成为可能,这些技能在物理治疗后变得自发。这表明大脑具有可塑性。目的在一项初步研究中,我们使用脑磁图(MEG)来验证这一假设。方法21例健康志愿者(对照组)和12例HFA术后患者分别进行闭眼、微笑、伸舌、咀嚼和拇指屈曲5项运动任务的MEG和肌电记录。对于每一项任务,我们在中央前回内选择了最大活动源的位置。我们计算了每个任务的这个位置和顶点之间的距离以及一个躯体解剖指数。结果被试组与任务之间存在交互作用(F(4124) = 4.07, p = 0.0039)。在CTRL中,微笑任务和舌头任务之间以及眼睑任务和舌头任务之间的最大源位置有统计学差异(p < 0.001)。HFA无明显差异(p = 1.000)。90.5%的CTRL和41.7%的HFA显示正常(p = 0.0046)。结论大鼠皮层运动区组织与潘菲尔德运动小丘相似。相比之下,HFA组的闭眼睑、伸舌和微笑区差异不显著。这支持了HFA后大脑可塑性假说。巴黎第六届国际医学论坛伦理委员会批准了该研究(CPP Ouest 6-CPP975-HPS2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cerebral plasticity after hypoglosso-facial anastomosis in facial palsy: a magnetoencephalography study

Background

Hypoglosso-facial anastomosis (HFA) consists in suturing the proximal part of the hypoglossal nerve with the distal part of the facial nerve in patients with facial palsy. Axonal regrowth through the anastomosis makes it possible to restore facial motor skills, which become spontaneous after physiotherapy. This suggests cerebral plasticity.

Objective

We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a pilot study to test this hypothesis.

Methods

Twenty-one healthy volunteers (CTRL) and 12 patients after HFA performed 5 motor tasks with MEG and electromyographic recordings: eyelid closure, smile, tongue protraction, mastication and thumb flexion. For each task, we picked the location of the maximum source activity within the precentral gyrus. We calculated the distances between this location and the vertex for each task and a somatotopy index.

Results

There was an interaction between the participant’s group and the task (F(4,124) = 4.07, p = 0.0039). In CTRL, the maximum source location was statistically different between smile and tongue tasks and between eyelid and tongue tasks (p < 0.001). No such difference was observed in HFA (p = 1.000). 90.5 % of CTRL and 41.7 % of HFA showed a normal somatotopy (p = 0.0046).

Conclusions

In CTRL, the organization of the cortical motor areas was similar to that of Penfield’s motor Homunculus. In contrast, in HFA, eyelid closure, tongue protraction and smile areas were not significantly distinct. This supports the hypothesis of cerebral plasticity after HFA.
The Ethical Committee of Paris Idf VI approved the study (CPP Ouest 6-CPP975-HPS2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信