{"title":"自我报告的技能测量与职业伤害之间关系的调查。","authors":"Morgan Marquardt, Ruth Woiwode","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf300.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working with cattle is dangerous; the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports fatal injuries for animal agriculture workers in 2019 was 22.2 per 100,000 full-time workers, while the rate for all private sectors was 3.8 per 100,000. Occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle may result in hospitalization, time away from work, disability, and death. Skill level is likely a contributing factor for risk of occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle. Highly skilled handlers may understand critical principles of cattle behavior and handling practices associated with safer cattle handling. There is not a published method for objective assessment of skill. Years of experience (YOE) working with cattle is a common metric for describing eligibility for employment working with cattle. This metric is based on the assumption that more time spent employed as a livestock worker results in an inevitable increase in skill. To better understand the implications of such assumptions, and factors associated with occupational injury, investigators collected survey data and assessed objective criteria for 20 participants. Demographic information, including YOE, self-rating, and injury history were obtained from all participants. An expert evaluated participants during 10 predetermined cattle handling tasks and scored their performance. Independently assigned scores were compared to self-rating of expertise and injury history for each participant. All participants reported five or more years of experience working with cattle and rated their expertise between 2-4 on a 5-point scale, where 1 denoted beginner and 5 denoted expert. For participants who reported similar YOE, injury history varied. Male participants with a self-rating of 2 or 3 reported no prior injuries sustained while working with cattle, but 100% with a self-rating of 4 reported prior injuries. For female participants with a self-rating of 4, 50% reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. When compared with female participants, a greater percentage of male participants (80% vs. 40%) reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. In this study, self-reported measures did not agree with independently scored skill level, and may not be reliable for reporting eligibility for employment.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSVIII-14 An investigation of relationship between self-reported measures of skill and occupational injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Marquardt, Ruth Woiwode\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skaf300.385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Working with cattle is dangerous; the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports fatal injuries for animal agriculture workers in 2019 was 22.2 per 100,000 full-time workers, while the rate for all private sectors was 3.8 per 100,000. Occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle may result in hospitalization, time away from work, disability, and death. Skill level is likely a contributing factor for risk of occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle. Highly skilled handlers may understand critical principles of cattle behavior and handling practices associated with safer cattle handling. There is not a published method for objective assessment of skill. Years of experience (YOE) working with cattle is a common metric for describing eligibility for employment working with cattle. This metric is based on the assumption that more time spent employed as a livestock worker results in an inevitable increase in skill. To better understand the implications of such assumptions, and factors associated with occupational injury, investigators collected survey data and assessed objective criteria for 20 participants. Demographic information, including YOE, self-rating, and injury history were obtained from all participants. An expert evaluated participants during 10 predetermined cattle handling tasks and scored their performance. Independently assigned scores were compared to self-rating of expertise and injury history for each participant. All participants reported five or more years of experience working with cattle and rated their expertise between 2-4 on a 5-point scale, where 1 denoted beginner and 5 denoted expert. For participants who reported similar YOE, injury history varied. Male participants with a self-rating of 2 or 3 reported no prior injuries sustained while working with cattle, but 100% with a self-rating of 4 reported prior injuries. For female participants with a self-rating of 4, 50% reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. When compared with female participants, a greater percentage of male participants (80% vs. 40%) reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. In this study, self-reported measures did not agree with independently scored skill level, and may not be reliable for reporting eligibility for employment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.385\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
和牛一起工作很危险;美国劳工统计局报告称,2019年畜牧业工人的致命伤害率为每10万名全职工人22.2人,而所有私营部门的致命伤害率为每10万人3.8人。与牛一起工作时遭受的职业伤害可能导致住院、停工、残疾和死亡。技能水平可能是与牛一起工作时遭受职业伤害风险的一个促成因素。高度熟练的操作人员可能了解与更安全的牛操作相关的牛行为和操作实践的关键原则。目前还没有一种客观评估技能的公开方法。与牛打交道的经验年数(YOE)是描述与牛打交道的就业资格的常用指标。这一指标是基于这样的假设,即作为牲畜工人花费更多的时间必然会提高技能。为了更好地理解这些假设的含义以及与职业伤害相关的因素,研究人员收集了20名参与者的调查数据并评估了客观标准。获得所有参与者的人口统计信息,包括YOE、自评和损伤史。一位专家在10项预先确定的处理牛的任务中对参与者进行评估,并对他们的表现进行评分。独立分配的分数与每位参与者的专业知识和受伤史的自评进行比较。所有参与者都报告了五年或五年以上与牛一起工作的经验,并在5分制中将他们的专业知识评为2-4分,其中1表示初学者,5表示专家。对于报告相似YOE的参与者,损伤史各不相同。自评为2或3的男性参与者报告在与牛一起工作时没有受伤,但自评为4的男性参与者报告有100%受伤。对于自我评价为450%的女性参与者,报告了之前与牛一起工作的受伤经历。与女性参与者相比,男性参与者(80% vs. 40%)报告先前与牛一起工作时受伤的比例更高。在这项研究中,自我报告的措施与独立评分的技能水平不一致,并且可能不可靠地报告就业资格。
PSVIII-14 An investigation of relationship between self-reported measures of skill and occupational injuries.
Working with cattle is dangerous; the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports fatal injuries for animal agriculture workers in 2019 was 22.2 per 100,000 full-time workers, while the rate for all private sectors was 3.8 per 100,000. Occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle may result in hospitalization, time away from work, disability, and death. Skill level is likely a contributing factor for risk of occupational injuries sustained while working with cattle. Highly skilled handlers may understand critical principles of cattle behavior and handling practices associated with safer cattle handling. There is not a published method for objective assessment of skill. Years of experience (YOE) working with cattle is a common metric for describing eligibility for employment working with cattle. This metric is based on the assumption that more time spent employed as a livestock worker results in an inevitable increase in skill. To better understand the implications of such assumptions, and factors associated with occupational injury, investigators collected survey data and assessed objective criteria for 20 participants. Demographic information, including YOE, self-rating, and injury history were obtained from all participants. An expert evaluated participants during 10 predetermined cattle handling tasks and scored their performance. Independently assigned scores were compared to self-rating of expertise and injury history for each participant. All participants reported five or more years of experience working with cattle and rated their expertise between 2-4 on a 5-point scale, where 1 denoted beginner and 5 denoted expert. For participants who reported similar YOE, injury history varied. Male participants with a self-rating of 2 or 3 reported no prior injuries sustained while working with cattle, but 100% with a self-rating of 4 reported prior injuries. For female participants with a self-rating of 4, 50% reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. When compared with female participants, a greater percentage of male participants (80% vs. 40%) reported prior injuries sustained working with cattle. In this study, self-reported measures did not agree with independently scored skill level, and may not be reliable for reporting eligibility for employment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year.
Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.