Courtney A Archer, Storey L Forster, Benny E Mote, Ty B Schmidt, Jon Anderson, Lee J Johnston, Yuzhi Li
{"title":"217了解猪的咬尾行为:一天中的时间、姿势和喂食器占用的影响。","authors":"Courtney A Archer, Storey L Forster, Benny E Mote, Ty B Schmidt, Jon Anderson, Lee J Johnston, Yuzhi Li","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf300.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to identify when and where tail-biting occurs and analyze pig postures to inform management strategies that reduce tail-biting and improve pig welfare. Pigs (N = 315; initial weight = 22.07 ± 3.76 kg) with intact tails were assigned to small (SG, 9 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 1.55 m) or large (LG, 18 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 3.10 m) pens, with SG having 4 feeder spaces and LG having 8 feeder spaces. Pig behavior was recorded continuously for 14 weeks using the NUtrack Livestock Monitoring System. Videos were manually viewed from 0800 to 1500 h on the day before the first tail-biting outbreak in each pen to register behavior when tail-biting occurred. Data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure in SAS. Standardized residuals (> 2 or < -2) were used to identify significant deviations in temporal distribution and feeder occupancy. Residuals of hourly tail-biting events indicated a higher-than-expected occurrence between 0800 – 0900 h (r = 3.21) and 1400 – 1500 h (r = 3.72), whereas lower-than-expected occurrences were observed between 0900 – 1000 h (r = -3.26) and 1000 – 1100 h (r = -4.36). Victimized pigs were primarily lying sternal (χ2 = 1818.06, df = 5; P < 0.0001), while pigs engaging in tail-biting were more likely to be standing compared to non-biting pigs (χ2 = 1008.6, df = 3; P < 0.0001) during tail-biting events. Tail-biting predominantly occurred in the middle of the pen rather than near the front or rear of the pen (χ2 = 24.41, df = 2; P < 0.0001). Tail-biting was more likely to occur when feeder occupancy was low, specifically when 50% or fewer of the feeder spaces were occupied, in both SG (χ² = 362.55, df = 4; P < 0.0001) and LG (χ² = 224.86, df = 8; P < 0.0001). In SG, biting was significantly overrepresented when 0 or 1 pigs were at the feeder (r = 9.70, 9.34). Pigs in LG exhibited a similar trend, with tail-biting overrepresented when 0, 1, 2, or 3 pigs were at the feeder (r = 3.0, 2.04, 6.35, 7.62). These results indicate that tail-biting occurred more frequently when victimized pigs were lying sternally in the middle of the pen during the morning and late afternoon, particularly when most feeder spaces were unoccupied. Further research is needed to validate these findings for the development of management strategies to minimize tail-biting and improve pig welfare.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"217 Understanding tail-biting in pigs: Effects of time of day, posture, and feeder occupancy.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney A Archer, Storey L Forster, Benny E Mote, Ty B Schmidt, Jon Anderson, Lee J Johnston, Yuzhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skaf300.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to identify when and where tail-biting occurs and analyze pig postures to inform management strategies that reduce tail-biting and improve pig welfare. Pigs (N = 315; initial weight = 22.07 ± 3.76 kg) with intact tails were assigned to small (SG, 9 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 1.55 m) or large (LG, 18 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 3.10 m) pens, with SG having 4 feeder spaces and LG having 8 feeder spaces. Pig behavior was recorded continuously for 14 weeks using the NUtrack Livestock Monitoring System. Videos were manually viewed from 0800 to 1500 h on the day before the first tail-biting outbreak in each pen to register behavior when tail-biting occurred. Data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure in SAS. Standardized residuals (> 2 or < -2) were used to identify significant deviations in temporal distribution and feeder occupancy. Residuals of hourly tail-biting events indicated a higher-than-expected occurrence between 0800 – 0900 h (r = 3.21) and 1400 – 1500 h (r = 3.72), whereas lower-than-expected occurrences were observed between 0900 – 1000 h (r = -3.26) and 1000 – 1100 h (r = -4.36). Victimized pigs were primarily lying sternal (χ2 = 1818.06, df = 5; P < 0.0001), while pigs engaging in tail-biting were more likely to be standing compared to non-biting pigs (χ2 = 1008.6, df = 3; P < 0.0001) during tail-biting events. Tail-biting predominantly occurred in the middle of the pen rather than near the front or rear of the pen (χ2 = 24.41, df = 2; P < 0.0001). Tail-biting was more likely to occur when feeder occupancy was low, specifically when 50% or fewer of the feeder spaces were occupied, in both SG (χ² = 362.55, df = 4; P < 0.0001) and LG (χ² = 224.86, df = 8; P < 0.0001). In SG, biting was significantly overrepresented when 0 or 1 pigs were at the feeder (r = 9.70, 9.34). Pigs in LG exhibited a similar trend, with tail-biting overrepresented when 0, 1, 2, or 3 pigs were at the feeder (r = 3.0, 2.04, 6.35, 7.62). These results indicate that tail-biting occurred more frequently when victimized pigs were lying sternally in the middle of the pen during the morning and late afternoon, particularly when most feeder spaces were unoccupied. Further research is needed to validate these findings for the development of management strategies to minimize tail-biting and improve pig welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是确定咬尾发生的时间和地点,并分析猪的姿势,为减少咬尾和提高猪福利的管理策略提供信息。尾巴完好的猪(N = 315头,初始体重= 22.07±3.76 kg)被分配到小猪圈(SG, 9头猪/圈,4.80 x 1.55 m)或大猪圈(LG, 18头猪/圈,4.80 x 3.10 m), SG有4个喂食区,LG有8个喂食区。使用NUtrack牲畜监测系统连续记录14周的猪行为。在每个围栏第一次咬尾爆发前一天的0800至1500小时手动观看视频,以记录咬尾发生时的行为。数据分析采用SAS的FREQ程序。标准化残差(>; 2或&;lt; -2)用于识别时间分布和饲料占用的显著偏差。每小时咬尾事件的残差表明,0800 - 0900 h (r = 3.21)和1400 - 1500 h (r = 3.72)之间的咬尾事件发生率高于预期,而0900 - 1000 h (r = -3.26)和1000 - 1100 h (r = -4.36)之间的咬尾事件发生率低于预期。受害猪主要躺在胸骨上(χ2 = 1818.06, df = 5; P < 0.0001),而在咬尾事件中,咬尾猪比不咬尾的猪更有可能站着(χ2 = 1008.6, df = 3; P < 0.0001)。咬尾主要发生在猪圈中部,而不是猪圈前部或后部(χ2 = 24.41, df = 2; P < 0.0001)。在SG (χ²= 362.55,df = 4; P < 0.0001)和LG (χ²= 224.86,df = 8; P < 0.0001)中,当饲料占用率较低时,特别是当50%或更少的饲料空间被占用时,咬尾更容易发生。在SG中,饲养0头或1头猪时,咬人现象显著过度(r = 9.70, 9.34)。LG的猪也表现出类似的趋势,当饲养0头、1头、2头和3头猪时,咬尾现象过多(r = 3.0, 2.04, 6.35, 7.62)。这些结果表明,当受害猪在上午和下午晚些时候直立躺在猪圈中央时,咬尾发生的频率更高,特别是当大多数喂食空间无人使用时。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,以制定管理策略,以减少咬尾和提高猪的福利。
217 Understanding tail-biting in pigs: Effects of time of day, posture, and feeder occupancy.
The objective of this study was to identify when and where tail-biting occurs and analyze pig postures to inform management strategies that reduce tail-biting and improve pig welfare. Pigs (N = 315; initial weight = 22.07 ± 3.76 kg) with intact tails were assigned to small (SG, 9 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 1.55 m) or large (LG, 18 pigs/pen, 4.80 x 3.10 m) pens, with SG having 4 feeder spaces and LG having 8 feeder spaces. Pig behavior was recorded continuously for 14 weeks using the NUtrack Livestock Monitoring System. Videos were manually viewed from 0800 to 1500 h on the day before the first tail-biting outbreak in each pen to register behavior when tail-biting occurred. Data were analyzed using the FREQ procedure in SAS. Standardized residuals (> 2 or < -2) were used to identify significant deviations in temporal distribution and feeder occupancy. Residuals of hourly tail-biting events indicated a higher-than-expected occurrence between 0800 – 0900 h (r = 3.21) and 1400 – 1500 h (r = 3.72), whereas lower-than-expected occurrences were observed between 0900 – 1000 h (r = -3.26) and 1000 – 1100 h (r = -4.36). Victimized pigs were primarily lying sternal (χ2 = 1818.06, df = 5; P < 0.0001), while pigs engaging in tail-biting were more likely to be standing compared to non-biting pigs (χ2 = 1008.6, df = 3; P < 0.0001) during tail-biting events. Tail-biting predominantly occurred in the middle of the pen rather than near the front or rear of the pen (χ2 = 24.41, df = 2; P < 0.0001). Tail-biting was more likely to occur when feeder occupancy was low, specifically when 50% or fewer of the feeder spaces were occupied, in both SG (χ² = 362.55, df = 4; P < 0.0001) and LG (χ² = 224.86, df = 8; P < 0.0001). In SG, biting was significantly overrepresented when 0 or 1 pigs were at the feeder (r = 9.70, 9.34). Pigs in LG exhibited a similar trend, with tail-biting overrepresented when 0, 1, 2, or 3 pigs were at the feeder (r = 3.0, 2.04, 6.35, 7.62). These results indicate that tail-biting occurred more frequently when victimized pigs were lying sternally in the middle of the pen during the morning and late afternoon, particularly when most feeder spaces were unoccupied. Further research is needed to validate these findings for the development of management strategies to minimize tail-biting and improve pig welfare.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year.
Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.