Jae Won Lee, Hyun-Tae Shin, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Jin Park, Gwang Seong Choi
{"title":"巴西替尼在韩国治疗斑秃的临床疗效和安全性。","authors":"Jae Won Lee, Hyun-Tae Shin, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Jin Park, Gwang Seong Choi","doi":"10.5021/ad.25.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor that has shown significant efficacy in phase 3 trials for alopecia areata (AA). However, real-world data on its use for AA remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Korean patients with AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, 117 patients with AA received oral baricitinib 4 mg daily for at least 36 weeks. Patient demographics, Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SALT scores significantly decreased from baseline at all time points (<i>p</i><0.001). By week 36, 55.4% of patients with a baseline SALT score >50 and 48.9% with a baseline score >95 achieved a SALT score of 20 or less. Notably, in Group A (baseline SALT score between 50 and 100) by week 36, the percentages for SALT 75, SALT 90, and SALT 100 were 52.0%, 44.0%, and 22.7%, respectively, while in Group B (baseline SALT score ≤50), the percentages were 81.0%, 66.7%, and 54.8%, respectively. Group B showed a significantly greater mean percentage improvement in SALT scores compared to Group A (<i>p</i><0.001, Welch's t-test). Repeated measures analysis of variance further revealed that both group and time had significant effects on treatment response (<i>p</i><0.001). Adverse reactions were mostly mild to moderate in severity and resolved with appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baricitinib was well tolerated and resulted in clinical improvement among patients with AA in a real-world clinical setting. Baricitinib is a potential treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant AA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94298,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dermatology","volume":"37 5","pages":"307-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Patients With Alopecia Areata in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Won Lee, Hyun-Tae Shin, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Jin Park, Gwang Seong Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5021/ad.25.059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor that has shown significant efficacy in phase 3 trials for alopecia areata (AA). However, real-world data on its use for AA remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Korean patients with AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, 117 patients with AA received oral baricitinib 4 mg daily for at least 36 weeks. Patient demographics, Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SALT scores significantly decreased from baseline at all time points (<i>p</i><0.001). By week 36, 55.4% of patients with a baseline SALT score >50 and 48.9% with a baseline score >95 achieved a SALT score of 20 or less. Notably, in Group A (baseline SALT score between 50 and 100) by week 36, the percentages for SALT 75, SALT 90, and SALT 100 were 52.0%, 44.0%, and 22.7%, respectively, while in Group B (baseline SALT score ≤50), the percentages were 81.0%, 66.7%, and 54.8%, respectively. Group B showed a significantly greater mean percentage improvement in SALT scores compared to Group A (<i>p</i><0.001, Welch's t-test). Repeated measures analysis of variance further revealed that both group and time had significant effects on treatment response (<i>p</i><0.001). Adverse reactions were mostly mild to moderate in severity and resolved with appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baricitinib was well tolerated and resulted in clinical improvement among patients with AA in a real-world clinical setting. Baricitinib is a potential treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant AA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of dermatology\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"307-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.25.059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.25.059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Patients With Alopecia Areata in Korea.
Background: Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor that has shown significant efficacy in phase 3 trials for alopecia areata (AA). However, real-world data on its use for AA remain limited.
Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in Korean patients with AA.
Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 117 patients with AA received oral baricitinib 4 mg daily for at least 36 weeks. Patient demographics, Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores, and adverse events were assessed.
Results: SALT scores significantly decreased from baseline at all time points (p<0.001). By week 36, 55.4% of patients with a baseline SALT score >50 and 48.9% with a baseline score >95 achieved a SALT score of 20 or less. Notably, in Group A (baseline SALT score between 50 and 100) by week 36, the percentages for SALT 75, SALT 90, and SALT 100 were 52.0%, 44.0%, and 22.7%, respectively, while in Group B (baseline SALT score ≤50), the percentages were 81.0%, 66.7%, and 54.8%, respectively. Group B showed a significantly greater mean percentage improvement in SALT scores compared to Group A (p<0.001, Welch's t-test). Repeated measures analysis of variance further revealed that both group and time had significant effects on treatment response (p<0.001). Adverse reactions were mostly mild to moderate in severity and resolved with appropriate management.
Conclusion: Baricitinib was well tolerated and resulted in clinical improvement among patients with AA in a real-world clinical setting. Baricitinib is a potential treatment option for patients with treatment-resistant AA.