使用不同尺寸的腹腔镜成像屏幕(55英寸vs 27英寸)对子宫切除术手术参数的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mustafa Can Sivas, Berna Aslan Cetin, Karolin Ohanoglu Cetinel, Ipek Emine Geyikoglu
{"title":"使用不同尺寸的腹腔镜成像屏幕(55英寸vs 27英寸)对子宫切除术手术参数的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Mustafa Can Sivas, Berna Aslan Cetin, Karolin Ohanoglu Cetinel, Ipek Emine Geyikoglu","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03168-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitors that can provide 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D) images, as well as high-definition (HD) or 4 K-HD image quality, offer various conveniences to surgeons. While studies comparing 2D and 3D screens exist in the literature, studies are needed to investigate the effects of different monitor sizes on surgical success. This study aimed to examine the impact of screen size on surgical parameters in patients who have undergone a hysterectomy using either a 55-inch or a 27-inch monitor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and salpingectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy between May 2022 and July 2023 were retrospectively screened. Two groups were created. GroupA consisted of patients who underwent surgery using a 55-inch (140 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. GroupB consisted of patients whose surgery was performed using a 27-inch (69 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. A total of 72 women (n(GroupA) = 36, n(GroupB) = 36) were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding age, number of cesarean sections, or body mass index (p > 0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found between groups regarding the total surgery duration (GroupA, GroupB; (126.86 ± 50.42), (128.97 ± 44.29), p = 0.851, respectively). When evaluating the percentage decrease in hemoglobin values before and after surgery, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups (GroupA, GroupB; (-0.11 ± 0.06), (-0.11 ± 0.07), p = 0.746, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding hematocrit changes, frequency of intraoperative complications, postoperative infections, the time to first gas passage, and length of hospital stay (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laparoscopic monitor systems with 4 K-HD resolution, the screen size, whether 27-inches or 55-inches, may not significantly affect surgical parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of using laparoscopic imaging screens of different sizes (55-inch vs. 27-inch) on surgical parameters in hysterectomy surgery: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Can Sivas, Berna Aslan Cetin, Karolin Ohanoglu Cetinel, Ipek Emine Geyikoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-03168-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitors that can provide 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D) images, as well as high-definition (HD) or 4 K-HD image quality, offer various conveniences to surgeons. While studies comparing 2D and 3D screens exist in the literature, studies are needed to investigate the effects of different monitor sizes on surgical success. This study aimed to examine the impact of screen size on surgical parameters in patients who have undergone a hysterectomy using either a 55-inch or a 27-inch monitor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and salpingectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy between May 2022 and July 2023 were retrospectively screened. Two groups were created. GroupA consisted of patients who underwent surgery using a 55-inch (140 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. GroupB consisted of patients whose surgery was performed using a 27-inch (69 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. A total of 72 women (n(GroupA) = 36, n(GroupB) = 36) were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding age, number of cesarean sections, or body mass index (p > 0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found between groups regarding the total surgery duration (GroupA, GroupB; (126.86 ± 50.42), (128.97 ± 44.29), p = 0.851, respectively). When evaluating the percentage decrease in hemoglobin values before and after surgery, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups (GroupA, GroupB; (-0.11 ± 0.06), (-0.11 ± 0.07), p = 0.746, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding hematocrit changes, frequency of intraoperative complications, postoperative infections, the time to first gas passage, and length of hospital stay (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laparoscopic monitor systems with 4 K-HD resolution, the screen size, whether 27-inches or 55-inches, may not significantly affect surgical parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03168-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03168-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:可以提供二维(2D)或三维(3D)图像,以及高清(HD)或4k -HD图像质量的显示器为外科医生提供了各种便利。虽然文献中已有比较2D和3D屏幕的研究,但需要研究不同监视器尺寸对手术成功的影响。本研究旨在检查使用55英寸或27英寸显示器进行子宫切除术的患者的屏幕尺寸对手术参数的影响。方法:回顾性筛选2022年5月至2023年7月期间行腹腔镜子宫切除术和输卵管切除术/输卵管卵巢切除术的患者。创建了两组。a组包括接受手术的患者,使用55英寸(140厘米)的2D和4k - hd显示器。b组患者使用27英寸(69厘米)2D和4k - hd显示器进行手术。本研究共纳入72例女性,其中n(A组)= 36例,n(b组)= 36例。结果:两组患者年龄、剖宫产次数、体重指数差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组总手术时间差异无统计学意义(a组、b组分别为(126.86±50.42)、(128.97±44.29),p = 0.851)。在评估手术前后血红蛋白值下降百分比时,两组间差异无统计学意义(a组、b组;(-0.11±0.06)、(-0.11±0.07),p = 0.746)。两组患者的红细胞压积变化、术中并发症发生频率、术后感染、首次通气时间、住院时间差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:在4k - hd分辨率的腹腔镜监测系统中,屏幕尺寸,无论是27英寸还是55英寸,可能不会显著影响手术参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of using laparoscopic imaging screens of different sizes (55-inch vs. 27-inch) on surgical parameters in hysterectomy surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Monitors that can provide 2-dimensional (2D) or 3-dimensional (3D) images, as well as high-definition (HD) or 4 K-HD image quality, offer various conveniences to surgeons. While studies comparing 2D and 3D screens exist in the literature, studies are needed to investigate the effects of different monitor sizes on surgical success. This study aimed to examine the impact of screen size on surgical parameters in patients who have undergone a hysterectomy using either a 55-inch or a 27-inch monitor.

Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and salpingectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy between May 2022 and July 2023 were retrospectively screened. Two groups were created. GroupA consisted of patients who underwent surgery using a 55-inch (140 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. GroupB consisted of patients whose surgery was performed using a 27-inch (69 cm) monitor with both 2D and 4 K-HD features. A total of 72 women (n(GroupA) = 36, n(GroupB) = 36) were included in the study.

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding age, number of cesarean sections, or body mass index (p > 0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found between groups regarding the total surgery duration (GroupA, GroupB; (126.86 ± 50.42), (128.97 ± 44.29), p = 0.851, respectively). When evaluating the percentage decrease in hemoglobin values before and after surgery, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups (GroupA, GroupB; (-0.11 ± 0.06), (-0.11 ± 0.07), p = 0.746, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding hematocrit changes, frequency of intraoperative complications, postoperative infections, the time to first gas passage, and length of hospital stay (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: In laparoscopic monitor systems with 4 K-HD resolution, the screen size, whether 27-inches or 55-inches, may not significantly affect surgical parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信