识别非自愿亲密图像共享的驱动因素:犯罪者研究的混合方法综合。

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Stine Nygård, Maren Kristin Nysæter, Ligia Ribeiro Ferreira, Lars Roar Frøyland, Ingela Lundin Kvalem
{"title":"识别非自愿亲密图像共享的驱动因素:犯罪者研究的混合方法综合。","authors":"Stine Nygård, Maren Kristin Nysæter, Ligia Ribeiro Ferreira, Lars Roar Frøyland, Ingela Lundin Kvalem","doi":"10.1177/15248380251375912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Echoing the many and serious consequences of nonconsensual sharing of intimate images (NCSII), calls for preventive measures have reverberated across public, legal, and academic discourses. However, at present, empirical insights that could aid the development of perpetrator-focused interventions remain fragmented. Responding to this predicament, we carried out a mixed-methods research synthesis through which we aimed to identify and distill all extant research on the psychosocial mechanisms of NCSII, focusing in particular on perpetrator motives and characteristics, as well as the social dynamics of NCSII incidents. A systematic search across six databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubPsych, PubMed, and ERIC) yielded 10,324 unique records, of which 68 peer-reviewed articles were deemed eligible following screening and full-text evaluation. Findings from quantitative (<i>n</i> = 55) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 13) studies were synthesized separately and later integrated in an overarching discussion. Through this juxtaposition, we found that NCSII appears to primarily transpire as a form of homosocial bonding, initiated by individuals who tend to have more experiences with intimate sharing practices than non-perpetrators, and whose actions are situated in a wider social context of hegemonic masculinity, female sexual objectification, and sexism. Notably, although gender was not found to be a reliable predictor of perpetration, our synthesis indicates that the social dynamics of NCSII differ for boys/men and girls/women, underscoring the need for gender-sensitive approaches in both research and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251375912"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Drivers of Nonconsensual Intimate Image Sharing: A Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Perpetrator Research.\",\"authors\":\"Stine Nygård, Maren Kristin Nysæter, Ligia Ribeiro Ferreira, Lars Roar Frøyland, Ingela Lundin Kvalem\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380251375912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Echoing the many and serious consequences of nonconsensual sharing of intimate images (NCSII), calls for preventive measures have reverberated across public, legal, and academic discourses. However, at present, empirical insights that could aid the development of perpetrator-focused interventions remain fragmented. Responding to this predicament, we carried out a mixed-methods research synthesis through which we aimed to identify and distill all extant research on the psychosocial mechanisms of NCSII, focusing in particular on perpetrator motives and characteristics, as well as the social dynamics of NCSII incidents. A systematic search across six databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubPsych, PubMed, and ERIC) yielded 10,324 unique records, of which 68 peer-reviewed articles were deemed eligible following screening and full-text evaluation. Findings from quantitative (<i>n</i> = 55) and qualitative (<i>n</i> = 13) studies were synthesized separately and later integrated in an overarching discussion. Through this juxtaposition, we found that NCSII appears to primarily transpire as a form of homosocial bonding, initiated by individuals who tend to have more experiences with intimate sharing practices than non-perpetrators, and whose actions are situated in a wider social context of hegemonic masculinity, female sexual objectification, and sexism. Notably, although gender was not found to be a reliable predictor of perpetration, our synthesis indicates that the social dynamics of NCSII differ for boys/men and girls/women, underscoring the need for gender-sensitive approaches in both research and prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248380251375912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251375912\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251375912","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与未经同意分享私密图像(NCSII)的许多严重后果相呼应,呼吁采取预防措施的呼声在公共、法律和学术话语中引起了反响。然而,目前,可以帮助制定以肇事者为重点的干预措施的经验见解仍然零散。为了应对这一困境,我们进行了一项混合方法的综合研究,旨在识别和提炼所有现有的关于NCSII心理社会机制的研究,特别是关注犯罪者的动机和特征,以及NCSII事件的社会动态。在六个数据库(Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubPsych, PubMed和ERIC)中进行系统搜索,产生了10,324条独特记录,其中68篇经过同行评审的文章经过筛选和全文评估后被认为符合条件。定量研究(n = 55)和定性研究(n = 13)的研究结果分别进行综合,然后整合到总体讨论中。通过这种对比,我们发现NCSII似乎主要是作为一种同性恋社会联系的形式发生的,由那些比非犯罪者有更多亲密分享实践经验的个体发起,他们的行为处于更广泛的男性霸权、女性性物化和性别歧视的社会背景中。值得注意的是,尽管性别没有被发现是犯罪的可靠预测因素,但我们的综合研究表明,NCSII的社会动态在男孩/男人和女孩/女人之间是不同的,这强调了在研究和预防中都需要对性别敏感的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Drivers of Nonconsensual Intimate Image Sharing: A Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Perpetrator Research.

Echoing the many and serious consequences of nonconsensual sharing of intimate images (NCSII), calls for preventive measures have reverberated across public, legal, and academic discourses. However, at present, empirical insights that could aid the development of perpetrator-focused interventions remain fragmented. Responding to this predicament, we carried out a mixed-methods research synthesis through which we aimed to identify and distill all extant research on the psychosocial mechanisms of NCSII, focusing in particular on perpetrator motives and characteristics, as well as the social dynamics of NCSII incidents. A systematic search across six databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, PubPsych, PubMed, and ERIC) yielded 10,324 unique records, of which 68 peer-reviewed articles were deemed eligible following screening and full-text evaluation. Findings from quantitative (n = 55) and qualitative (n = 13) studies were synthesized separately and later integrated in an overarching discussion. Through this juxtaposition, we found that NCSII appears to primarily transpire as a form of homosocial bonding, initiated by individuals who tend to have more experiences with intimate sharing practices than non-perpetrators, and whose actions are situated in a wider social context of hegemonic masculinity, female sexual objectification, and sexism. Notably, although gender was not found to be a reliable predictor of perpetration, our synthesis indicates that the social dynamics of NCSII differ for boys/men and girls/women, underscoring the need for gender-sensitive approaches in both research and prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信