小分子抑制剂批准的全球监管变异性:FDA、EMA和PMDA在时间表、剂量和儿科适应症方面的差异

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista
{"title":"小分子抑制剂批准的全球监管变异性:FDA、EMA和PMDA在时间表、剂量和儿科适应症方面的差异","authors":"Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista","doi":"10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Small-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global regulatory variability in small-molecule inhibitor approvals: Differences in timelines, dosing, and pediatric indications across FDA, EMA, and PMDA.\",\"authors\":\"Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Small-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-025-04066-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,小分子抑制剂已经改变了肿瘤学。本研究比较了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和日本药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)对这些药物的监管批准,重点是时间表、剂量建议和儿科标签。方法:对监管数据库进行审查,以确定批准用于成人恶性肿瘤的小分子抑制剂。比较药物标签以确定剂量一致性(完全、部分或非一致性)、批准日期和儿科适应症。数据提取涉及两名独立审稿人。结果:这三个机构批准了55种抑制剂。成人给药完全一致者49例(89%),部分一致者4例(7%),不一致者2例(4%)。中位批准间隔为25个月(范围:1-88)。FDA首次批准了85.5%的药物,其次是PMDA(12.7%)和EMA(1.8%)。在这55种药物中,只有15种具有儿科适应症(27%),其中7种(46.7%)在所有三个地区获得批准。虽然最低年龄阈值有所不同,但在儿童给药方面没有观察到完全的差异。讨论:尽管在成人剂量方面有很强的一致性,但在批准时间表和儿科标签方面的监管差异仍然存在,有可能延迟治疗的可用性。更加协调的多国试验和监管一致性可以促进及时批准,同时允许在剂量和安全性方面考虑针对特定人群的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global regulatory variability in small-molecule inhibitor approvals: Differences in timelines, dosing, and pediatric indications across FDA, EMA, and PMDA.

Purpose: Small-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.

Methods: A review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.

Results: Fifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied.

Discussion: Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信