游离输精管分离修复成年男性腹股沟疝与经腹腹膜前假体的比较研究。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zhi-Wei Zhang, Chen Shaoji
{"title":"游离输精管分离修复成年男性腹股沟疝与经腹腹膜前假体的比较研究。","authors":"Zhi-Wei Zhang, Chen Shaoji","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03134-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is now widely performed worldwide. However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate surgical operation for inguinal hernia in adult males. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and applicability of laparoscopic free vas deferens separation with transabdominal preperitoneal (LFVD-TAPP) repair for inguinal hernia in adult males, in comparison to the conventional transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 189 adult male patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between February 2020 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups that included the LFVD-TAPP (n = 95) and the conventional TAPP (n = 94). Observation targets included surgical and postoperative recovery, complication rates, recurrence and chronic pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups. The LFVD-TAPP group showed significantly shorter operative times for both unilateral and bilateral hernias compared to the TAPP group (0.97 ± 0.20 h vs. 1.60 ± 0.21 h; 1.21 ± 0.17 h vs. 2.01 ± 0.30 h; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization costs (P > 0.05). However, the LFVD-TAPP group exhibited a higher incidence of temporary groin induration (11 vs. 4; P < 0.05),but significantly lower rates of scrotal hematoma (5 vs. 17; P < 0.05), and chronic pain (6 vs. 11; P < 0.05). No differences were observed in other complications or recurrence rates. Follow-up over 12-24 months revealed no cases of ischemic orchitis, testicular atrophy, or ejaculatory dysfunction in the LFVD-TAPP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFVD-TAPP presents clinical advantages over conventional TAPP, including simplified intraoperative separation, reduced surgical difficulty, and lower rates of postoperative scrotal hematoma and chronic pain, without increasing the risk of recurrence. Therefore, the LFVD-TAPP provides better protection of the vas deferens, suggesting its potential for clinical application and broader promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of free vas deferens separation for repair of inguinal hernia and transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis for adult males.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Wei Zhang, Chen Shaoji\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-03134-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is now widely performed worldwide. However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate surgical operation for inguinal hernia in adult males. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and applicability of laparoscopic free vas deferens separation with transabdominal preperitoneal (LFVD-TAPP) repair for inguinal hernia in adult males, in comparison to the conventional transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 189 adult male patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between February 2020 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups that included the LFVD-TAPP (n = 95) and the conventional TAPP (n = 94). Observation targets included surgical and postoperative recovery, complication rates, recurrence and chronic pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups. The LFVD-TAPP group showed significantly shorter operative times for both unilateral and bilateral hernias compared to the TAPP group (0.97 ± 0.20 h vs. 1.60 ± 0.21 h; 1.21 ± 0.17 h vs. 2.01 ± 0.30 h; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization costs (P > 0.05). However, the LFVD-TAPP group exhibited a higher incidence of temporary groin induration (11 vs. 4; P < 0.05),but significantly lower rates of scrotal hematoma (5 vs. 17; P < 0.05), and chronic pain (6 vs. 11; P < 0.05). No differences were observed in other complications or recurrence rates. Follow-up over 12-24 months revealed no cases of ischemic orchitis, testicular atrophy, or ejaculatory dysfunction in the LFVD-TAPP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LFVD-TAPP presents clinical advantages over conventional TAPP, including simplified intraoperative separation, reduced surgical difficulty, and lower rates of postoperative scrotal hematoma and chronic pain, without increasing the risk of recurrence. Therefore, the LFVD-TAPP provides better protection of the vas deferens, suggesting its potential for clinical application and broader promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03134-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03134-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术现已在世界范围内广泛应用。然而,对于成年男性腹股沟疝的最佳手术方式尚无共识。本研究旨在评价腹腔镜下经腹膜前游离输精管分离(LFVD-TAPP)修复成年男性腹股沟疝的临床疗效和适用性,并与传统经腹膜前假体(TAPP)入路进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2020年2月至2023年1月在东吴大学第一附属医院行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的成年男性患者189例。患者分为LFVD-TAPP组(n = 95)和常规TAPP组(n = 94)。观察对象包括手术及术后恢复情况、并发症发生率、复发率和慢性疼痛。数据采用SPSS 27.0进行分析,统计学意义定义为p。结果:组间基线特征无显著差异。LFVD-TAPP组单侧和双侧疝手术时间均明显短于TAPP组(0.97±0.20 h vs 1.60±0.21 h; 1.21±0.17 h vs 2.01±0.30 h; P < 0.05)。结论:与常规TAPP相比,LFVD-TAPP具有简化术中分离、降低手术难度、降低术后阴囊血肿和慢性疼痛发生率等临床优势,且不增加复发风险。因此,LFVD-TAPP对输精管具有较好的保护作用,具有临床应用和推广的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of free vas deferens separation for repair of inguinal hernia and transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis for adult males.

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is now widely performed worldwide. However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate surgical operation for inguinal hernia in adult males. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and applicability of laparoscopic free vas deferens separation with transabdominal preperitoneal (LFVD-TAPP) repair for inguinal hernia in adult males, in comparison to the conventional transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis (TAPP) approach.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 189 adult male patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between February 2020 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups that included the LFVD-TAPP (n = 95) and the conventional TAPP (n = 94). Observation targets included surgical and postoperative recovery, complication rates, recurrence and chronic pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05.

Results: No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between groups. The LFVD-TAPP group showed significantly shorter operative times for both unilateral and bilateral hernias compared to the TAPP group (0.97 ± 0.20 h vs. 1.60 ± 0.21 h; 1.21 ± 0.17 h vs. 2.01 ± 0.30 h; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, or hospitalization costs (P > 0.05). However, the LFVD-TAPP group exhibited a higher incidence of temporary groin induration (11 vs. 4; P < 0.05),but significantly lower rates of scrotal hematoma (5 vs. 17; P < 0.05), and chronic pain (6 vs. 11; P < 0.05). No differences were observed in other complications or recurrence rates. Follow-up over 12-24 months revealed no cases of ischemic orchitis, testicular atrophy, or ejaculatory dysfunction in the LFVD-TAPP group.

Conclusions: LFVD-TAPP presents clinical advantages over conventional TAPP, including simplified intraoperative separation, reduced surgical difficulty, and lower rates of postoperative scrotal hematoma and chronic pain, without increasing the risk of recurrence. Therefore, the LFVD-TAPP provides better protection of the vas deferens, suggesting its potential for clinical application and broader promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信