低资源环境下裂隙提供者视角下的社会心理护理。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan
{"title":"低资源环境下裂隙提供者视角下的社会心理护理。","authors":"Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan","doi":"10.1177/10556656251382697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251382697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656251382697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656251382697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382697\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在资源匮乏的环境下,实现包括心理社会服务在内的唇腭裂各方面的多学科方法存在一些障碍。这项研究的目的是深入了解这些环境中当前的社会心理实践。DesignCross-sectional研究。2024年10月开设唇裂综合护理工作坊。ParticipantsWorkshop参与者。干预措施分发了一份20项调查,其中包括有关参与者工作场所心理社会实践的定量和定性问题。主要结果测量主要结果是评估裂隙社会心理实践,以及在低资源环境中整合社会心理护理时面临的挑战。结果76名受访者在非洲或亚洲资源匮乏地区工作,其中67.2%在整形或口腔颌面外科工作,68.4%在学术医院工作。近90%的受访者在多学科团队中工作。在那些回答在他们的环境中有心理社会护理的人中(n = 44), 47.7%的人报告说心理学家或精神科医生负责提供这种护理。这些答复者中有25人(56.8%)报告说,虽然有心理社会支持,但这种服务不是由唇裂专家提供的。大多数受访者报告说,缺乏资源/工具(68.4%)是将患者转介到社会心理护理的一个挑战,并提到需要:(1)更多的腭裂专业社会心理人员;(二)专门的财政预算;(3)意识增强;(4)整合多学科讨论的协议。结论在资源匮乏的地区,唇腭裂患者对社会心理服务的可得性、可及性、重要性和建议提供的知识仍然有限。需要进一步研究社会心理需求和改善分娩的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings.

ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信