Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan
{"title":"低资源环境下裂隙提供者视角下的社会心理护理。","authors":"Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan","doi":"10.1177/10556656251382697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251382697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Andari, Roland Assaf, Ismat Annan, Giuliana Roggiero, Nicola M Stock, Usama Hamdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656251382697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656251382697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382697\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251382697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychosocial Care From the Cleft Provider Perspective in Low Resource Settings.
ObjectiveIn low resource settings, there are several barriers to achieving a multidisciplinary approach covering all aspects of cleft including psychosocial services. The study aim was to gain insight into current psychosocial practices in these settings.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingComprehensive Cleft Care Workshop in October 2024.ParticipantsWorkshop Attendees.InterventionsA 20-item survey including quantitative and qualitative questions about psychosocial practices in participants' workplaces was distributed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcomes were to assess cleft psychosocial practices, and the challenges faced when integrating psychosocial care in low resource settings.ResultsSeventy-six respondents were working in low-resource settings in Africa or Asia, with 67.2% working in plastic or oral/maxillofacial surgery department and 68.4% working in an academic hospital. Almost 90% of respondents work in a multidisciplinary team. Of those who responded that psychosocial care was available in their setting (n = 44), 47.7% reported that either psychologists or psychiatrists were responsible for providing this care. Twenty-five (56.8%) of these respondents reported that although psychosocial support is available, this service is not provided by a cleft specialist. Most respondents reported a lack of resources/tools (68.4%) as a challenge to referring patients to psychosocial care and mentioned a need for: (1) more cleft-specialized psychosocial personnel; (2) dedicated financial budgets; (3) increased awareness; and (4) protocols to integrate multidisciplinary discussions.ConclusionsAvailability, accessibility and knowledge of the importance and recommended delivery of psychosocial services in cleft remains limited in low resource settings. Further research into psychosocial needs and ways of improving delivery is required.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.