解码植物氧化还原途径:过氧化物还毒素和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶的结构和功能比较。

IF 5.7 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Thomaz Stumpf Trenz, Marcia Margis-Pinheiro
{"title":"解码植物氧化还原途径:过氧化物还毒素和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶的结构和功能比较。","authors":"Thomaz Stumpf Trenz,&nbsp;Marcia Margis-Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plants face constant environmental challenges that lead to fluctuations in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Among these, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) stands out as a stable and diffusible signaling molecule that modulates the redox state of key proteins. To prevent oxidative damage while maintaining signaling functions, plants rely on thiol peroxidases (TPXs), particularly glutathione peroxidase-like proteins (GPXLs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs). Both enzyme families catalyze peroxide reduction and share thiol-based redox mechanisms, seemingly converging on similar functions. This review highlights both the convergence and, more importantly, the divergence between GPXLs and PRXs in plants, including their evolutionary histories, domain architectures, and substrate and reductant specificities. While 2-Cys PRXs are well-established redox sensors capable of relaying oxidative signals to target proteins or via thioredoxin networks, relatively few examples have confirmed that GPXLs can also oxidize specific target proteins, positioning them as potential redox signal transducers. We explore documented cases of GPXL- and PRX-mediated redox signaling in stress responses and emphasize the need for further investigation into TPX interactomes and posttranslational modifications. Unraveling the distinct and overlapping functions of PRXs and GPXLs will provide deeper insight into how plants fine-tune redox signals to cope with environmental stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20234,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 110580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding redox pathways in plants: Structural and functional comparison of peroxiredoxins and glutathione peroxidases\",\"authors\":\"Thomaz Stumpf Trenz,&nbsp;Marcia Margis-Pinheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Plants face constant environmental challenges that lead to fluctuations in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Among these, hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) stands out as a stable and diffusible signaling molecule that modulates the redox state of key proteins. To prevent oxidative damage while maintaining signaling functions, plants rely on thiol peroxidases (TPXs), particularly glutathione peroxidase-like proteins (GPXLs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs). Both enzyme families catalyze peroxide reduction and share thiol-based redox mechanisms, seemingly converging on similar functions. This review highlights both the convergence and, more importantly, the divergence between GPXLs and PRXs in plants, including their evolutionary histories, domain architectures, and substrate and reductant specificities. While 2-Cys PRXs are well-established redox sensors capable of relaying oxidative signals to target proteins or via thioredoxin networks, relatively few examples have confirmed that GPXLs can also oxidize specific target proteins, positioning them as potential redox signal transducers. We explore documented cases of GPXL- and PRX-mediated redox signaling in stress responses and emphasize the need for further investigation into TPX interactomes and posttranslational modifications. Unraveling the distinct and overlapping functions of PRXs and GPXLs will provide deeper insight into how plants fine-tune redox signals to cope with environmental stress.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825011088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825011088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物面临着持续的环境挑战,导致细胞内活性氧(ROS)水平的波动。其中,过氧化氢(H2O2)作为一种稳定的、可扩散的信号分子,可以调节关键蛋白质的氧化还原状态。为了在维持信号功能的同时防止氧化损伤,植物依赖于硫醇过氧化物酶(TPXs),特别是谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶样蛋白(GPXLs)和过氧化物还毒素(PRXs)。这两个酶家族催化过氧化物还原和共享基于硫醇的氧化还原机制,似乎在相似的功能上趋同。本文综述了植物GPXLs和prx的趋同和差异,包括它们的进化历史、结构域结构、底物和还原剂特异性。虽然2-Cys prx是公认的氧化还原传感器,能够将氧化信号传递到靶蛋白或通过硫氧还蛋白网络,但相对较少的例子证实gpxl也可以氧化特定的靶蛋白,将其定位为潜在的氧化还原信号转导器。我们研究了GPXL-和prx介导的氧化还原信号在应激反应中的记录案例,并强调需要进一步研究TPX相互作用组和翻译后修饰。揭示PRXs和gpxl的独特和重叠功能将为植物如何微调氧化还原信号以应对环境胁迫提供更深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoding redox pathways in plants: Structural and functional comparison of peroxiredoxins and glutathione peroxidases
Plants face constant environmental challenges that lead to fluctuations in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Among these, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stands out as a stable and diffusible signaling molecule that modulates the redox state of key proteins. To prevent oxidative damage while maintaining signaling functions, plants rely on thiol peroxidases (TPXs), particularly glutathione peroxidase-like proteins (GPXLs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs). Both enzyme families catalyze peroxide reduction and share thiol-based redox mechanisms, seemingly converging on similar functions. This review highlights both the convergence and, more importantly, the divergence between GPXLs and PRXs in plants, including their evolutionary histories, domain architectures, and substrate and reductant specificities. While 2-Cys PRXs are well-established redox sensors capable of relaying oxidative signals to target proteins or via thioredoxin networks, relatively few examples have confirmed that GPXLs can also oxidize specific target proteins, positioning them as potential redox signal transducers. We explore documented cases of GPXL- and PRX-mediated redox signaling in stress responses and emphasize the need for further investigation into TPX interactomes and posttranslational modifications. Unraveling the distinct and overlapping functions of PRXs and GPXLs will provide deeper insight into how plants fine-tune redox signals to cope with environmental stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
410
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original theoretical, experimental and technical contributions in the various fields of plant physiology (biochemistry, physiology, structure, genetics, plant-microbe interactions, etc.) at diverse levels of integration (molecular, subcellular, cellular, organ, whole plant, environmental). Opinions expressed in the journal are the sole responsibility of the authors and publication does not imply the editors'' agreement. Manuscripts describing molecular-genetic and/or gene expression data that are not integrated with biochemical analysis and/or actual measurements of plant physiological processes are not suitable for PPB. Also "Omics" studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) reporting descriptive analysis without an element of functional validation assays, will not be considered. Similarly, applied agronomic or phytochemical studies that generate no new, fundamental insights in plant physiological and/or biochemical processes are not suitable for publication in PPB. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes several types of articles: Reviews, Papers and Short Papers. Articles for Reviews are either invited by the editor or proposed by the authors for the editor''s prior agreement. Reviews should not exceed 40 typewritten pages and Short Papers no more than approximately 8 typewritten pages. The fundamental character of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry remains that of a journal for original results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信