{"title":"CDK4/6抑制剂治疗转移性乳腺癌不良事件的安全性和治疗连续性:日本的一项探索性单中心研究","authors":"Makiko Go, Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Keitaro Kamei, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Eiseki Usami, Tomoaki Yoshimura","doi":"10.1159/000548801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Palbociclib and abemaciclib, CDK4/6 inhibitors with a shared primary mechanism of action, differ in their adverse effect profiles. We encountered several cases of switching between CDK4/6 inhibitors following treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated the safety and treatment continuity of switching between palbociclib and abemaciclib for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (HR+/HER2-MBC) in patients prescribed these agents between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2024, at Ogaki Municipal Hospital. Patients who did not discontinue treatment owing to AEs were defined as the non-AE group (79 patients), those who switched to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs were defined as the AE-switch group (16 patients), and those who did not switch to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs as the AE-stop group (13 patients). The main AEs for which treatment was discontinued included neutropenia, interstitial lung disease, increased AST and ALT levels, gastrointestinal symptoms, and skin disorders. Switching only caused recurrent neutropenia, with no serious recurrence being observed for the other AEs. The median progression-free survival in the non-AE, AE-switch, and AE-stop groups was 392, 1,043, and 203 days (p = 0.00858), and the median overall survival was 1,598, 3,725, and 1,701 days (p = 0.269), respectively. These results suggest that switching following the emergence of AEs may be useful in terms of safety and treatment continuity of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy for HR+/HER2-MBC. However, since this study was an exploratory analysis based on real-world data from a single center in Japan, further validation through large-scale, prospective, multicenter clinical trials is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Treatment Continuity of Switching Between CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer Due to Adverse Events: An Exploratory Single-Center Study in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Makiko Go, Michio Kimura, Shiori Yamada, Keitaro Kamei, Yoshihiro Noguchi, Eiseki Usami, Tomoaki Yoshimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Palbociclib and abemaciclib, CDK4/6 inhibitors with a shared primary mechanism of action, differ in their adverse effect profiles. We encountered several cases of switching between CDK4/6 inhibitors following treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated the safety and treatment continuity of switching between palbociclib and abemaciclib for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (HR+/HER2-MBC) in patients prescribed these agents between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2024, at Ogaki Municipal Hospital. Patients who did not discontinue treatment owing to AEs were defined as the non-AE group (79 patients), those who switched to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs were defined as the AE-switch group (16 patients), and those who did not switch to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs as the AE-stop group (13 patients). The main AEs for which treatment was discontinued included neutropenia, interstitial lung disease, increased AST and ALT levels, gastrointestinal symptoms, and skin disorders. Switching only caused recurrent neutropenia, with no serious recurrence being observed for the other AEs. The median progression-free survival in the non-AE, AE-switch, and AE-stop groups was 392, 1,043, and 203 days (p = 0.00858), and the median overall survival was 1,598, 3,725, and 1,701 days (p = 0.269), respectively. These results suggest that switching following the emergence of AEs may be useful in terms of safety and treatment continuity of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy for HR+/HER2-MBC. However, since this study was an exploratory analysis based on real-world data from a single center in Japan, further validation through large-scale, prospective, multicenter clinical trials is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548801\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Palbociclib和abemaciclib是CDK4/6抑制剂,具有共同的主要作用机制,但它们的不良反应不同。在临床实践中,我们遇到了几例由于不良事件(ae)而停止治疗后切换CDK4/6抑制剂的病例。在这项研究中,我们评估了2018年1月1日至2024年8月31日在大垣市医院(Ogaki Municipal Hospital)使用palbociclib和abemaciclib治疗激素受体阳性her2阴性转移性或复发性乳腺癌(HR+/HER2-MBC)患者的安全性和治疗连续性。未因ae停止治疗的患者定义为非ae组(79例),因ae停止治疗后改用另一种CDK4/6抑制剂的患者定义为ae切换组(16例),因ae停止治疗后未改用另一种CDK4/6抑制剂的患者定义为ae停止组(13例)。停止治疗的主要不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少症、间质性肺疾病、AST和ALT水平升高、胃肠道症状和皮肤疾病。转换仅引起复发性中性粒细胞减少症,未观察到其他不良事件的严重复发。非ae组、ae切换组和ae停止组的中位无进展生存期分别为392、1043和203天(p = 0.00858),中位总生存期分别为1598、3725和1701天(p = 0.269)。这些结果表明,在ae出现后的切换可能对HR+/HER2-MBC的CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的安全性和治疗连续性有用。然而,由于本研究是基于日本单中心真实世界数据的探索性分析,因此需要通过大规模、前瞻性、多中心临床试验进一步验证。
Safety and Treatment Continuity of Switching Between CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer Due to Adverse Events: An Exploratory Single-Center Study in Japan.
Palbociclib and abemaciclib, CDK4/6 inhibitors with a shared primary mechanism of action, differ in their adverse effect profiles. We encountered several cases of switching between CDK4/6 inhibitors following treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated the safety and treatment continuity of switching between palbociclib and abemaciclib for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (HR+/HER2-MBC) in patients prescribed these agents between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2024, at Ogaki Municipal Hospital. Patients who did not discontinue treatment owing to AEs were defined as the non-AE group (79 patients), those who switched to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs were defined as the AE-switch group (16 patients), and those who did not switch to another CDK4/6 inhibitor after treatment discontinuation owing to AEs as the AE-stop group (13 patients). The main AEs for which treatment was discontinued included neutropenia, interstitial lung disease, increased AST and ALT levels, gastrointestinal symptoms, and skin disorders. Switching only caused recurrent neutropenia, with no serious recurrence being observed for the other AEs. The median progression-free survival in the non-AE, AE-switch, and AE-stop groups was 392, 1,043, and 203 days (p = 0.00858), and the median overall survival was 1,598, 3,725, and 1,701 days (p = 0.269), respectively. These results suggest that switching following the emergence of AEs may be useful in terms of safety and treatment continuity of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy for HR+/HER2-MBC. However, since this study was an exploratory analysis based on real-world data from a single center in Japan, further validation through large-scale, prospective, multicenter clinical trials is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.