{"title":"质子治疗可以降低免疫检查点抑制剂治疗期间癌症进展的风险:强度调制质子与光子放疗的倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Cong Bo, Zhenhuan Lv, Hong Zhang, Xianmin Hou, Yinxin Wang, Jing Liu, Xue Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) may preserve the immune response more effectively than intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) owing to its dosimetric advantages, making it a potentially superior modality in immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of IMPT versus IMRT during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 466 patients (IMPT group, n=109; IMRT group, n=357) who received radiotherapy (RT) during ICI therapy between July 2022 and September 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was the duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and post-RT adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to calculate survival curves and identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold used to dichotomize post-RT lymphocyte count was 0.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced after PSM. The IMPT group showed significantly longer median DoR (17.7 vs. 5.7 months, p=0.0001) and PFS (18.8 vs. 6.8 months, p<0.0001) than the IMRT group. Multivariable regression revealed IMPT to be an independent predictor of improved DoR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.55; p<0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.52; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit of IMPT over IMRT in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, lung cancer, advanced-stage disease, or those receiving palliative, thoracic, or abdominal/pelvic RT. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts in the IMPT group showed potential correlation with improved DoR and PFS. Additionally, the IMPT group had fewer grade ≥2 post-RT adverse events (p=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMPT is linked to enhanced efficacy of ICIs, compared to IMRT, by improving DoR and PFS with tolerable adverse effects. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts may be associated with improved survival in patients receiving IMPT during ICI therapy. These findings suggest that IMPT may be a preferable option for preserving immune function, thereby optimizing outcomes during immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton therapy may reduce the risk of cancer progression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a propensity score-matched analysis of intensity-modulated proton versus photon radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cong Bo, Zhenhuan Lv, Hong Zhang, Xianmin Hou, Yinxin Wang, Jing Liu, Xue Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) may preserve the immune response more effectively than intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) owing to its dosimetric advantages, making it a potentially superior modality in immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of IMPT versus IMRT during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 466 patients (IMPT group, n=109; IMRT group, n=357) who received radiotherapy (RT) during ICI therapy between July 2022 and September 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was the duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and post-RT adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to calculate survival curves and identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold used to dichotomize post-RT lymphocyte count was 0.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced after PSM. The IMPT group showed significantly longer median DoR (17.7 vs. 5.7 months, p=0.0001) and PFS (18.8 vs. 6.8 months, p<0.0001) than the IMRT group. Multivariable regression revealed IMPT to be an independent predictor of improved DoR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.55; p<0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.52; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit of IMPT over IMRT in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, lung cancer, advanced-stage disease, or those receiving palliative, thoracic, or abdominal/pelvic RT. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts in the IMPT group showed potential correlation with improved DoR and PFS. Additionally, the IMPT group had fewer grade ≥2 post-RT adverse events (p=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMPT is linked to enhanced efficacy of ICIs, compared to IMRT, by improving DoR and PFS with tolerable adverse effects. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts may be associated with improved survival in patients receiving IMPT during ICI therapy. These findings suggest that IMPT may be a preferable option for preserving immune function, thereby optimizing outcomes during immunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proton therapy may reduce the risk of cancer progression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a propensity score-matched analysis of intensity-modulated proton versus photon radiotherapy.
Purpose: Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) may preserve the immune response more effectively than intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) owing to its dosimetric advantages, making it a potentially superior modality in immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of IMPT versus IMRT during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.
Methods and materials: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 466 patients (IMPT group, n=109; IMRT group, n=357) who received radiotherapy (RT) during ICI therapy between July 2022 and September 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was the duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and post-RT adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to calculate survival curves and identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold used to dichotomize post-RT lymphocyte count was 0.5 × 109/L.
Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced after PSM. The IMPT group showed significantly longer median DoR (17.7 vs. 5.7 months, p=0.0001) and PFS (18.8 vs. 6.8 months, p<0.0001) than the IMRT group. Multivariable regression revealed IMPT to be an independent predictor of improved DoR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.55; p<0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.52; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit of IMPT over IMRT in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, lung cancer, advanced-stage disease, or those receiving palliative, thoracic, or abdominal/pelvic RT. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts in the IMPT group showed potential correlation with improved DoR and PFS. Additionally, the IMPT group had fewer grade ≥2 post-RT adverse events (p=0.012).
Conclusions: IMPT is linked to enhanced efficacy of ICIs, compared to IMRT, by improving DoR and PFS with tolerable adverse effects. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts may be associated with improved survival in patients receiving IMPT during ICI therapy. These findings suggest that IMPT may be a preferable option for preserving immune function, thereby optimizing outcomes during immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.