言语流利双任务表现出更大的与年龄相关的认知运动干扰:行走表现的荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Kenneth Harrison, Keven Santa-Maria Guzman, Brandon M Peoples, Silvia Campos-Vargas, Bria R Smith, Damaris C Cifuentes, Grace Greer, Kristina A Neely, Jaimie A Roper
{"title":"言语流利双任务表现出更大的与年龄相关的认知运动干扰:行走表现的荟萃分析。","authors":"Kenneth Harrison, Keven Santa-Maria Guzman, Brandon M Peoples, Silvia Campos-Vargas, Bria R Smith, Damaris C Cifuentes, Grace Greer, Kristina A Neely, Jaimie A Roper","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07169-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A substantial body of literature has examined gait during cognitive dual-tasking in younger and older adults. However, it remains unclear how, and to what extent, different cognitive tasks uniquely influence gait. This meta-analysis quantified age-related differences in gait speed during dual-task walking. Importantly, we examined cognitive task as a potential moderator. We searched Web of Science for studies comparing young and older adults during single-task and dual-task walking conditions. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 544 young adults (mean age range: 20-31 years) and 511 older adults (mean age range: 62-85 years). Studies employed primarily serial subtraction tasks (n = 12) and verbal fluency tasks (n = 8); however, one study used digit vigilance, and another used a texting paradigm during walking. Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) revealed a significant overall effect (g = -0.2612, 95% CI [-0.4914, -0.0310], p = 0.0261), indicating greater dual-task costs in older adults compared to younger adults with a small to medium effect size. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 66.53%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that verbal fluency tasks produced a larger and statistically significant age-related difference (g = -0.4744, 95% CI [-0.8712, -0.0777], p = 0.0191), while serial subtraction tasks showed smaller, non-significant effects (g = -0.1412, p = 0.3474). These findings suggest that verbal fluency creates unique neural resource competition in older adults, involving prefrontal, cerebellar, and basal ganglia circuits that support both language production and gait control. The task-specific vulnerability to verbal fluency, and not serial subtraction, provides evidence for age-related changes in cognitive-motor integration. Rehabilitation strategies targeting executive functions may be effective for maintaining mobility in aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 11","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verbal fluency dual-tasks show greater age-related cognitive-motor interference: a meta-analysis of walking performance.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Harrison, Keven Santa-Maria Guzman, Brandon M Peoples, Silvia Campos-Vargas, Bria R Smith, Damaris C Cifuentes, Grace Greer, Kristina A Neely, Jaimie A Roper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07169-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A substantial body of literature has examined gait during cognitive dual-tasking in younger and older adults. However, it remains unclear how, and to what extent, different cognitive tasks uniquely influence gait. This meta-analysis quantified age-related differences in gait speed during dual-task walking. Importantly, we examined cognitive task as a potential moderator. We searched Web of Science for studies comparing young and older adults during single-task and dual-task walking conditions. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 544 young adults (mean age range: 20-31 years) and 511 older adults (mean age range: 62-85 years). Studies employed primarily serial subtraction tasks (n = 12) and verbal fluency tasks (n = 8); however, one study used digit vigilance, and another used a texting paradigm during walking. Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) revealed a significant overall effect (g = -0.2612, 95% CI [-0.4914, -0.0310], p = 0.0261), indicating greater dual-task costs in older adults compared to younger adults with a small to medium effect size. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I<sup>2</sup> = 66.53%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that verbal fluency tasks produced a larger and statistically significant age-related difference (g = -0.4744, 95% CI [-0.8712, -0.0777], p = 0.0191), while serial subtraction tasks showed smaller, non-significant effects (g = -0.1412, p = 0.3474). These findings suggest that verbal fluency creates unique neural resource competition in older adults, involving prefrontal, cerebellar, and basal ganglia circuits that support both language production and gait control. The task-specific vulnerability to verbal fluency, and not serial subtraction, provides evidence for age-related changes in cognitive-motor integration. Rehabilitation strategies targeting executive functions may be effective for maintaining mobility in aging populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 11\",\"pages\":\"219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07169-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07169-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量的文献研究了年轻人和老年人在认知双重任务中的步态。然而,目前尚不清楚不同的认知任务如何以及在多大程度上独特地影响步态。这项荟萃分析量化了双任务行走中与年龄相关的步态速度差异。重要的是,我们研究了认知任务作为一个潜在的调节因素。我们在Web of Science上搜索了比较年轻人和老年人在单任务和双任务行走条件下的研究。22项研究符合纳入标准,包括544名年轻人(平均年龄范围:20-31岁)和511名老年人(平均年龄范围:62-85岁)。研究主要采用连续减法任务(n = 12)和语言流畅性任务(n = 8);然而,一项研究使用了手指警惕性,另一项研究使用了走路时发短信的模式。使用标准化平均差异(Hedges' g)的随机效应荟萃分析显示,总体效应显著(g = -0.2612, 95% CI [-0.4914, -0.0310], p = 0.0261),表明老年人的双任务成本高于年轻人,且效应大小为小到中等。各研究间存在显著异质性(I2 = 66.53%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verbal fluency dual-tasks show greater age-related cognitive-motor interference: a meta-analysis of walking performance.

A substantial body of literature has examined gait during cognitive dual-tasking in younger and older adults. However, it remains unclear how, and to what extent, different cognitive tasks uniquely influence gait. This meta-analysis quantified age-related differences in gait speed during dual-task walking. Importantly, we examined cognitive task as a potential moderator. We searched Web of Science for studies comparing young and older adults during single-task and dual-task walking conditions. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 544 young adults (mean age range: 20-31 years) and 511 older adults (mean age range: 62-85 years). Studies employed primarily serial subtraction tasks (n = 12) and verbal fluency tasks (n = 8); however, one study used digit vigilance, and another used a texting paradigm during walking. Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) revealed a significant overall effect (g = -0.2612, 95% CI [-0.4914, -0.0310], p = 0.0261), indicating greater dual-task costs in older adults compared to younger adults with a small to medium effect size. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 = 66.53%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that verbal fluency tasks produced a larger and statistically significant age-related difference (g = -0.4744, 95% CI [-0.8712, -0.0777], p = 0.0191), while serial subtraction tasks showed smaller, non-significant effects (g = -0.1412, p = 0.3474). These findings suggest that verbal fluency creates unique neural resource competition in older adults, involving prefrontal, cerebellar, and basal ganglia circuits that support both language production and gait control. The task-specific vulnerability to verbal fluency, and not serial subtraction, provides evidence for age-related changes in cognitive-motor integration. Rehabilitation strategies targeting executive functions may be effective for maintaining mobility in aging populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信