{"title":"外用壳聚糖与米诺地尔治疗脱发的疗效比较:微针对照研究。","authors":"Jovian Wan, Olena Sydorchuk, Irwan Junawanto, Wonseok Choi, Nil Namthongton, Putri Hendira, Ardhiah Iswanda Putri, Pattra Chansataporn, Ruri Pamela, Kyu-Ho Yi","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide with immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, has shown promise in enhancing tissue repair. While 5% minoxidil remains the standard treatment for androgenetic alopecia, interest in non-hormonal or adjunctive therapies such as chitosan is growing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of topical 2% chitosan applied after microneedling in comparison with 5% topical minoxidil and a no-treatment control group in patients with androgenetic alopecia or diffuse hair loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, controlled study enrolled 30 patients (aged 22-58 y), randomized equally into 3 groups (n=10 each): (1) microneedling followed by 4 mL of 2% chitosan (Chitosan group), (2) twice-daily application of 5% topical minoxidil (Minoxidil group), and (3) untreated control (Control group). Treatments continued for 6 months. Primary outcomes included trichoscopic hair density and hair shaft diameter; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction scores and adverse events. A representative scalp biopsy from the chitosan group was evaluated histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months, both the chitosan and minoxidil groups demonstrated significant increases in mean hair density compared with the control group (+30.5% and +22.3%, respectively; P=0.032 and P=0.048). Although the chitosan group showed a numerically greater improvement than the minoxidil group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.62). Hair shaft diameter and patient satisfaction scores improved in both treatment groups. No meaningful changes were observed in the control group. Mild, transient erythema occurred in 3 patients (1 in the chitosan group and 2 in the minoxidil group). Histologic analysis in a chitosan-treated subject showed increased follicular density and improved dermal matrix organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small controlled study, microneedling followed by topical 2% chitosan resulted in significant improvements in hair growth parameters compared with no treatment, and outcomes were generally comparable to those observed with 5% minoxidil. While these results are promising, the small sample size limits definitive conclusions regarding comparative efficacy. Larger, adequately powered trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings and to better delineate the role of chitosan as a standalone or adjunctive therapy.</p><p><strong>Evidencebased level: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Topical Chitosan and Minoxidil in Hair Loss: A Controlled Study With Microneedling.\",\"authors\":\"Jovian Wan, Olena Sydorchuk, Irwan Junawanto, Wonseok Choi, Nil Namthongton, Putri Hendira, Ardhiah Iswanda Putri, Pattra Chansataporn, Ruri Pamela, Kyu-Ho Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000012051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide with immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, has shown promise in enhancing tissue repair. While 5% minoxidil remains the standard treatment for androgenetic alopecia, interest in non-hormonal or adjunctive therapies such as chitosan is growing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of topical 2% chitosan applied after microneedling in comparison with 5% topical minoxidil and a no-treatment control group in patients with androgenetic alopecia or diffuse hair loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, controlled study enrolled 30 patients (aged 22-58 y), randomized equally into 3 groups (n=10 each): (1) microneedling followed by 4 mL of 2% chitosan (Chitosan group), (2) twice-daily application of 5% topical minoxidil (Minoxidil group), and (3) untreated control (Control group). Treatments continued for 6 months. Primary outcomes included trichoscopic hair density and hair shaft diameter; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction scores and adverse events. A representative scalp biopsy from the chitosan group was evaluated histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months, both the chitosan and minoxidil groups demonstrated significant increases in mean hair density compared with the control group (+30.5% and +22.3%, respectively; P=0.032 and P=0.048). Although the chitosan group showed a numerically greater improvement than the minoxidil group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.62). Hair shaft diameter and patient satisfaction scores improved in both treatment groups. No meaningful changes were observed in the control group. Mild, transient erythema occurred in 3 patients (1 in the chitosan group and 2 in the minoxidil group). Histologic analysis in a chitosan-treated subject showed increased follicular density and improved dermal matrix organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small controlled study, microneedling followed by topical 2% chitosan resulted in significant improvements in hair growth parameters compared with no treatment, and outcomes were generally comparable to those observed with 5% minoxidil. While these results are promising, the small sample size limits definitive conclusions regarding comparative efficacy. Larger, adequately powered trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings and to better delineate the role of chitosan as a standalone or adjunctive therapy.</p><p><strong>Evidencebased level: </strong>Level II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:壳聚糖是一种具有免疫调节和再生特性的天然多糖,在促进组织修复方面具有良好的前景。虽然5%的米诺地尔仍然是雄激素性脱发的标准治疗方法,但对非激素或壳聚糖等辅助疗法的兴趣正在增长。目的:评价微针后外用2%壳聚糖治疗雄激素性脱发或弥漫性脱发的临床疗效和安全性,并与5%米诺地尔和无治疗对照组进行比较。方法:前瞻性对照研究纳入30例患者(年龄22-58岁),随机分为3组(每组n=10):(1)微针注射4 mL 2%壳聚糖(壳聚糖组),(2)每日2次外用5%米诺地尔(米诺地尔组),(3)未经治疗的对照组(对照组)。治疗持续6个月。主要结局包括毛密度和毛干直径;次要结局包括患者满意度评分和不良事件。对壳聚糖组有代表性的头皮活检进行组织学评价。结果:6个月后,壳聚糖组和米诺地尔组的平均毛密度均较对照组显著增加(分别为+30.5%和+22.3%;P=0.032和P=0.048)。尽管壳聚糖组在数值上比米诺地尔组表现出更大的改善,但这种差异没有统计学意义(P=0.62)。两个治疗组的毛干直径和患者满意度得分均有改善。对照组未见明显变化。3例患者出现轻度、短暂性红斑(壳聚糖组1例,米诺地尔组2例)。经壳聚糖处理的受试者的组织学分析显示毛囊密度增加,真皮基质组织改善。结论:在这项小型对照研究中,与未治疗相比,微针治疗后局部使用2%壳聚糖可显著改善头发生长参数,其结果与使用5%米诺地尔的结果大致相当。虽然这些结果很有希望,但样本量小限制了关于比较疗效的明确结论。需要更大规模、更有力的试验来证实这些初步发现,并更好地描述壳聚糖作为独立或辅助治疗的作用。循证等级:二级。
Comparative Efficacy of Topical Chitosan and Minoxidil in Hair Loss: A Controlled Study With Microneedling.
Background: Chitosan, a natural polysaccharide with immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, has shown promise in enhancing tissue repair. While 5% minoxidil remains the standard treatment for androgenetic alopecia, interest in non-hormonal or adjunctive therapies such as chitosan is growing.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of topical 2% chitosan applied after microneedling in comparison with 5% topical minoxidil and a no-treatment control group in patients with androgenetic alopecia or diffuse hair loss.
Methods: A prospective, controlled study enrolled 30 patients (aged 22-58 y), randomized equally into 3 groups (n=10 each): (1) microneedling followed by 4 mL of 2% chitosan (Chitosan group), (2) twice-daily application of 5% topical minoxidil (Minoxidil group), and (3) untreated control (Control group). Treatments continued for 6 months. Primary outcomes included trichoscopic hair density and hair shaft diameter; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction scores and adverse events. A representative scalp biopsy from the chitosan group was evaluated histologically.
Results: After 6 months, both the chitosan and minoxidil groups demonstrated significant increases in mean hair density compared with the control group (+30.5% and +22.3%, respectively; P=0.032 and P=0.048). Although the chitosan group showed a numerically greater improvement than the minoxidil group, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.62). Hair shaft diameter and patient satisfaction scores improved in both treatment groups. No meaningful changes were observed in the control group. Mild, transient erythema occurred in 3 patients (1 in the chitosan group and 2 in the minoxidil group). Histologic analysis in a chitosan-treated subject showed increased follicular density and improved dermal matrix organization.
Conclusions: In this small controlled study, microneedling followed by topical 2% chitosan resulted in significant improvements in hair growth parameters compared with no treatment, and outcomes were generally comparable to those observed with 5% minoxidil. While these results are promising, the small sample size limits definitive conclusions regarding comparative efficacy. Larger, adequately powered trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings and to better delineate the role of chitosan as a standalone or adjunctive therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.