Gianpiero Tebano, Caterina Campoli, Marianna Meschiari, Ilaria Contadini, Sara Grasselli, Claudia Lazzaretti, Martina Maritati, Luigi Raumer, Matteo Rinaldi, Nicolò Rossi, Kristian Scolz, Elisa Vanino, Cristina Mussini, Pierluigi Viale, Francesco Cristini
{"title":"探索由产生ampc的肠杆菌引起的血液感染的抗生素选择的异质性:来自病例研究的结果。","authors":"Gianpiero Tebano, Caterina Campoli, Marianna Meschiari, Ilaria Contadini, Sara Grasselli, Claudia Lazzaretti, Martina Maritati, Luigi Raumer, Matteo Rinaldi, Nicolò Rossi, Kristian Scolz, Elisa Vanino, Cristina Mussini, Pierluigi Viale, Francesco Cristini","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05293-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) remains controversial, due to limited clinical evidence and variable resistance profiles. Inappropriate antibiotic choices can induce ampC-encoding gene overexpression, leading to increased risk of therapeutic failure. This study aims to explore the current prescribing preferences among infectious disease (ID) physicians, in complex clinical scenarios involving BSIs caused by AmpC-E.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based case-vignette survey was conducted among a purposive sample of senior ID physicians from 10 ID units in Emilia-Romagna Region, northern Italy. Participants responded to 31 vignettes simulating BSIs caused by Enterobacter cloacae (wild-type or derepressed phenotype) or Serratia marcescens (wild-type phenotype), across varied clinical settings. For each scenario, participants selected their preferred antibiotic regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two ID physicians were invited to participate. Cefepime (48.4%) and meropenem (29.0%) were the most prescribed agents, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (16.1%) and third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) (6.5%). Cefepime was preferred in milder cases, while meropenem in severe infections, particularly with high inoculum or incomplete source control. Considerable heterogeneity in treatment choices was observed, especially for S. marcescens and E. cloacae with wild-type phenotypes. Agreement among clinicians was highest for intensive care admitted patients. Combination therapies were infrequently proposed (8.8% overall), primarily in the setting of intra-abdominal infections with incomplete source control or ventilator-associated pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant variability in the treatment of AmpC-E BSIs among ID physicians, reflecting clinical uncertainty and lack of high-quality evidence. Further research and updated, context-specific guidelines are needed to harmonize practice and promote optimal antibiotic stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring heterogeneity in antibiotic choices for bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing enterobacterales: results from a case-vignette study.\",\"authors\":\"Gianpiero Tebano, Caterina Campoli, Marianna Meschiari, Ilaria Contadini, Sara Grasselli, Claudia Lazzaretti, Martina Maritati, Luigi Raumer, Matteo Rinaldi, Nicolò Rossi, Kristian Scolz, Elisa Vanino, Cristina Mussini, Pierluigi Viale, Francesco Cristini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10096-025-05293-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) remains controversial, due to limited clinical evidence and variable resistance profiles. Inappropriate antibiotic choices can induce ampC-encoding gene overexpression, leading to increased risk of therapeutic failure. This study aims to explore the current prescribing preferences among infectious disease (ID) physicians, in complex clinical scenarios involving BSIs caused by AmpC-E.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based case-vignette survey was conducted among a purposive sample of senior ID physicians from 10 ID units in Emilia-Romagna Region, northern Italy. Participants responded to 31 vignettes simulating BSIs caused by Enterobacter cloacae (wild-type or derepressed phenotype) or Serratia marcescens (wild-type phenotype), across varied clinical settings. For each scenario, participants selected their preferred antibiotic regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two ID physicians were invited to participate. Cefepime (48.4%) and meropenem (29.0%) were the most prescribed agents, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (16.1%) and third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) (6.5%). Cefepime was preferred in milder cases, while meropenem in severe infections, particularly with high inoculum or incomplete source control. Considerable heterogeneity in treatment choices was observed, especially for S. marcescens and E. cloacae with wild-type phenotypes. Agreement among clinicians was highest for intensive care admitted patients. Combination therapies were infrequently proposed (8.8% overall), primarily in the setting of intra-abdominal infections with incomplete source control or ventilator-associated pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant variability in the treatment of AmpC-E BSIs among ID physicians, reflecting clinical uncertainty and lack of high-quality evidence. Further research and updated, context-specific guidelines are needed to harmonize practice and promote optimal antibiotic stewardship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05293-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05293-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring heterogeneity in antibiotic choices for bloodstream infections caused by AmpC-producing enterobacterales: results from a case-vignette study.
Purpose: The treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E) remains controversial, due to limited clinical evidence and variable resistance profiles. Inappropriate antibiotic choices can induce ampC-encoding gene overexpression, leading to increased risk of therapeutic failure. This study aims to explore the current prescribing preferences among infectious disease (ID) physicians, in complex clinical scenarios involving BSIs caused by AmpC-E.
Methods: A web-based case-vignette survey was conducted among a purposive sample of senior ID physicians from 10 ID units in Emilia-Romagna Region, northern Italy. Participants responded to 31 vignettes simulating BSIs caused by Enterobacter cloacae (wild-type or derepressed phenotype) or Serratia marcescens (wild-type phenotype), across varied clinical settings. For each scenario, participants selected their preferred antibiotic regimen.
Results: Forty-two ID physicians were invited to participate. Cefepime (48.4%) and meropenem (29.0%) were the most prescribed agents, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (16.1%) and third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) (6.5%). Cefepime was preferred in milder cases, while meropenem in severe infections, particularly with high inoculum or incomplete source control. Considerable heterogeneity in treatment choices was observed, especially for S. marcescens and E. cloacae with wild-type phenotypes. Agreement among clinicians was highest for intensive care admitted patients. Combination therapies were infrequently proposed (8.8% overall), primarily in the setting of intra-abdominal infections with incomplete source control or ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Conclusion: This study highlights significant variability in the treatment of AmpC-E BSIs among ID physicians, reflecting clinical uncertainty and lack of high-quality evidence. Further research and updated, context-specific guidelines are needed to harmonize practice and promote optimal antibiotic stewardship.
期刊介绍:
EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.