一种新的基于虚拟现实的视野设备(oculera)与humphrey视野分析仪的比较:一项单中心研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mehmet Talay Koylu, Alper Can Yilmaz, Hayati Yilmaz, Osman Melih Ceylan, Bagım Aycin Cakir, Atilla Bayer
{"title":"一种新的基于虚拟现实的视野设备(oculera)与humphrey视野分析仪的比较:一项单中心研究。","authors":"Mehmet Talay Koylu, Alper Can Yilmaz, Hayati Yilmaz, Osman Melih Ceylan, Bagım Aycin Cakir, Atilla Bayer","doi":"10.1177/11206721251383750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTo examine the correlation between Humphrey visual field analyzer and an automated virtual reality perimetry test (Oculera visual field analyzer) in glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.MethodsThis prospective, single-center study was conducted on 93 eyes of 93 patients, 55 of whom were glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) and 38 healthy subjects (normal group). HFA II (24-2, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) and Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive) tests were applied to all participants. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI) values of both devices were obtained. The correlation between the two devices was evaluated by statistical analyses of MD, PSD, and VFI.ResultsThe MD values were -6.36 dB (-31.8 to 2.27) for HFA II and -5.80 dB (-29.1 to 2.2) for Oculera. The difference between MDs of Oculera and HFA II was -0.56 dB. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in MD values between Oculera and HFA II (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there was a strong correlation between MDs (r = 0.932 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). With this, the results of the Bland-Altman analysis evaluating the agreement between the two tests showed that the differences between the MD measurements were not within the acceptable error range and that the results of the devices could not be used interchangeably. A strong correlation was found between the two devices in terms of PSD and VFI values (r = 0.752, r = 0.910, respectively).ConclusionsThe current findings are promising for the future use of Oculera in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251383750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a new virtual reality-based visual field device (oculera) with humphrey field analyzer: A single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Talay Koylu, Alper Can Yilmaz, Hayati Yilmaz, Osman Melih Ceylan, Bagım Aycin Cakir, Atilla Bayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721251383750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTo examine the correlation between Humphrey visual field analyzer and an automated virtual reality perimetry test (Oculera visual field analyzer) in glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.MethodsThis prospective, single-center study was conducted on 93 eyes of 93 patients, 55 of whom were glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) and 38 healthy subjects (normal group). HFA II (24-2, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) and Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive) tests were applied to all participants. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI) values of both devices were obtained. The correlation between the two devices was evaluated by statistical analyses of MD, PSD, and VFI.ResultsThe MD values were -6.36 dB (-31.8 to 2.27) for HFA II and -5.80 dB (-29.1 to 2.2) for Oculera. The difference between MDs of Oculera and HFA II was -0.56 dB. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in MD values between Oculera and HFA II (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, there was a strong correlation between MDs (r = 0.932 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). With this, the results of the Bland-Altman analysis evaluating the agreement between the two tests showed that the differences between the MD measurements were not within the acceptable error range and that the results of the devices could not be used interchangeably. A strong correlation was found between the two devices in terms of PSD and VFI values (r = 0.752, r = 0.910, respectively).ConclusionsThe current findings are promising for the future use of Oculera in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11206721251383750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251383750\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251383750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨在青光眼患者和健康人中,Humphrey视野分析仪与自动虚拟现实视距测试(Oculera视野分析仪)的相关性。方法对93例患者93只眼进行前瞻性、单中心研究,其中青光眼患者55例(青光眼组),健康者38例(正常组)。所有参与者均采用HFA II (24-2, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm)和Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive)检验。获得两种装置的平均偏差(MD)、模式标准差(PSD)和视野指数(VFI)值。通过MD、PSD和VFI的统计分析来评估两种设备之间的相关性。结果HFAⅱ的MD值为-6.36 dB (-31.8 ~ 2.27), Oculera的MD值为-5.80 dB(-29.1 ~ 2.2)。HFA II与Oculera的md差值为-0.56 dB。Wilcoxon sign -rank检验显示,Oculera与HFA II的MD值差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of a new virtual reality-based visual field device (oculera) with humphrey field analyzer: A single-center study.

BackgroundTo examine the correlation between Humphrey visual field analyzer and an automated virtual reality perimetry test (Oculera visual field analyzer) in glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.MethodsThis prospective, single-center study was conducted on 93 eyes of 93 patients, 55 of whom were glaucoma patients (glaucoma group) and 38 healthy subjects (normal group). HFA II (24-2, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) and Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive) tests were applied to all participants. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI) values of both devices were obtained. The correlation between the two devices was evaluated by statistical analyses of MD, PSD, and VFI.ResultsThe MD values were -6.36 dB (-31.8 to 2.27) for HFA II and -5.80 dB (-29.1 to 2.2) for Oculera. The difference between MDs of Oculera and HFA II was -0.56 dB. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in MD values between Oculera and HFA II (p < 0.001). However, there was a strong correlation between MDs (r = 0.932 and p < 0.001). With this, the results of the Bland-Altman analysis evaluating the agreement between the two tests showed that the differences between the MD measurements were not within the acceptable error range and that the results of the devices could not be used interchangeably. A strong correlation was found between the two devices in terms of PSD and VFI values (r = 0.752, r = 0.910, respectively).ConclusionsThe current findings are promising for the future use of Oculera in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信