缺乏威廉姆斯综合征相关基因改变了斑马鱼的数量辨别。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jose Vicente Torres-Pérez, Sofia Anagianni, Eva Sheardown, Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini, Scott E Fraser, Brian Butterworth, Giorgio Vallortigara, Caroline H Brennan
{"title":"缺乏威廉姆斯综合征相关基因改变了斑马鱼的数量辨别。","authors":"Jose Vicente Torres-Pérez, Sofia Anagianni, Eva Sheardown, Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini, Scott E Fraser, Brian Butterworth, Giorgio Vallortigara, Caroline H Brennan","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to discriminate sets of items based on their numerosity is alleged to be an evolutionary conserved mechanism in all vertebrates. People with Williams syndrome (WS), a rare multigenic condition, show altered number and quantity cognition abilities. Assessing the contribution of specific genes to WS using animal models could help understand the basis of numerical impairments. Here, we assessed the quantitative abilities of juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio) with loss of function of two of the genes affected in WS using a group size preference behavioural assay. The selected genes were: baz1b, implicated in neural crest development; and fzd9b, associated with neuronal functioning. The contrasts studied were 2 versus 5, 2 versus 4 and 2 versus 3. While group-level comparisons did not reveal statistically significant genotype differences, single-sample tests suggested a reduced preference for larger shoals in some contrasts among mutants. These trends were more apparent when the total number of items likely exceeded working memory capacity (i.e., 6 or more items), while performance on small numerosity contrasts remained relatively intact. These data agree with previous analyses of humans with WS and offer preliminary evidence that specific genes may influence quantity discrimination. Our research also supports the use of zebrafish as model organisms in which to characterise the neurobiological basis of dyscalculia in WS and associated disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of Williams syndrome-associated genes alters quantity discrimination in zebrafish.\",\"authors\":\"Jose Vicente Torres-Pérez, Sofia Anagianni, Eva Sheardown, Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini, Scott E Fraser, Brian Butterworth, Giorgio Vallortigara, Caroline H Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to discriminate sets of items based on their numerosity is alleged to be an evolutionary conserved mechanism in all vertebrates. People with Williams syndrome (WS), a rare multigenic condition, show altered number and quantity cognition abilities. Assessing the contribution of specific genes to WS using animal models could help understand the basis of numerical impairments. Here, we assessed the quantitative abilities of juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio) with loss of function of two of the genes affected in WS using a group size preference behavioural assay. The selected genes were: baz1b, implicated in neural crest development; and fzd9b, associated with neuronal functioning. The contrasts studied were 2 versus 5, 2 versus 4 and 2 versus 3. While group-level comparisons did not reveal statistically significant genotype differences, single-sample tests suggested a reduced preference for larger shoals in some contrasts among mutants. These trends were more apparent when the total number of items likely exceeded working memory capacity (i.e., 6 or more items), while performance on small numerosity contrasts remained relatively intact. These data agree with previous analyses of humans with WS and offer preliminary evidence that specific genes may influence quantity discrimination. Our research also supports the use of zebrafish as model organisms in which to characterise the neurobiological basis of dyscalculia in WS and associated disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115860\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据数量来区分一组物品的能力被认为是所有脊椎动物的一种进化保守机制。患有威廉姆斯综合征(WS)的人,是一种罕见的多基因疾病,表现出数量和数量认知能力的改变。利用动物模型评估特定基因对WS的贡献有助于理解数值损伤的基础。在这里,我们使用群体大小偏好行为测定法评估了失去两个受WS影响基因功能的幼斑马鱼(Danio rerio)的定量能力。选择的基因是:baz1b,涉及神经嵴发育;fzd9b,与神经元功能有关。研究的对比是2对5,2对4,2对3。虽然群体水平的比较没有显示出统计学上显著的基因型差异,但单样本测试表明,在一些突变体之间的对比中,对较大鱼群的偏好降低了。当项目总数可能超过工作记忆容量(即6个或更多项目)时,这些趋势更为明显,而在小数字对比方面的表现相对完整。这些数据与先前对WS患者的分析一致,并提供了特异性基因可能影响数量辨别的初步证据。我们的研究也支持使用斑马鱼作为模式生物来表征WS和相关疾病中计算障碍的神经生物学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lack of Williams syndrome-associated genes alters quantity discrimination in zebrafish.

The ability to discriminate sets of items based on their numerosity is alleged to be an evolutionary conserved mechanism in all vertebrates. People with Williams syndrome (WS), a rare multigenic condition, show altered number and quantity cognition abilities. Assessing the contribution of specific genes to WS using animal models could help understand the basis of numerical impairments. Here, we assessed the quantitative abilities of juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio) with loss of function of two of the genes affected in WS using a group size preference behavioural assay. The selected genes were: baz1b, implicated in neural crest development; and fzd9b, associated with neuronal functioning. The contrasts studied were 2 versus 5, 2 versus 4 and 2 versus 3. While group-level comparisons did not reveal statistically significant genotype differences, single-sample tests suggested a reduced preference for larger shoals in some contrasts among mutants. These trends were more apparent when the total number of items likely exceeded working memory capacity (i.e., 6 or more items), while performance on small numerosity contrasts remained relatively intact. These data agree with previous analyses of humans with WS and offer preliminary evidence that specific genes may influence quantity discrimination. Our research also supports the use of zebrafish as model organisms in which to characterise the neurobiological basis of dyscalculia in WS and associated disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信