包容性能效补贴的分配效应:多维马太效应的实证研究。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Boqiang Lin, Ziqiang Lin
{"title":"包容性能效补贴的分配效应:多维马太效应的实证研究。","authors":"Boqiang Lin, Ziqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy-efficiency subsidies are inclusive policies designed to promote a green transition for consumers. However, the fairness of their subsidy distribution has received insufficient attention. This study uses China's 2024 Energy-Efficiency Subsidy (EES) policy for home appliances as a quasi-natural experiment. We analyze high-frequency panel data from the JD.com platform, covering 12,936 products and comprising 1,552,320 daily observations spanning 120 days. Employing a difference-in-differences approach, we empirically evaluate the distributional effects of EES across multiple dimensions. The findings revealed three key results. First, EES significantly boosted sales of energy-efficient appliances. However, best-selling products, dominant brands, and leading platforms captured a disproportionate share of the policy benefits. Second, at the regional level, the policy's impact was significantly stronger in developed regions compared to less developed ones. Third, regions with high energy consumption received a larger share of subsidies for energy-efficient products. This highlights the inherent trade-off between efficiency and equity goals. Based on these findings, we recommend specific policy design refinements aimed at mitigating the distributional inequalities that can arise during subsidy implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"394 ","pages":"127500"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The distributional effects of inclusive energy-efficiency subsidies: An empirical study of multi-dimensional Matthew effects.\",\"authors\":\"Boqiang Lin, Ziqiang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Energy-efficiency subsidies are inclusive policies designed to promote a green transition for consumers. However, the fairness of their subsidy distribution has received insufficient attention. This study uses China's 2024 Energy-Efficiency Subsidy (EES) policy for home appliances as a quasi-natural experiment. We analyze high-frequency panel data from the JD.com platform, covering 12,936 products and comprising 1,552,320 daily observations spanning 120 days. Employing a difference-in-differences approach, we empirically evaluate the distributional effects of EES across multiple dimensions. The findings revealed three key results. First, EES significantly boosted sales of energy-efficient appliances. However, best-selling products, dominant brands, and leading platforms captured a disproportionate share of the policy benefits. Second, at the regional level, the policy's impact was significantly stronger in developed regions compared to less developed ones. Third, regions with high energy consumption received a larger share of subsidies for energy-efficient products. This highlights the inherent trade-off between efficiency and equity goals. Based on these findings, we recommend specific policy design refinements aimed at mitigating the distributional inequalities that can arise during subsidy implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"127500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能效补贴是一项包容性政策,旨在促进消费者向绿色转型。然而,其补贴分配的公平性却没有得到足够的重视。本研究采用中国2024年家电能效补贴政策作为准自然实验。我们分析了来自京东平台的高频面板数据,涵盖12,936种产品,包括120天内的1,552,320个每日观察。采用差异中的差异方法,我们在多个维度上对EES的分布效应进行了实证评估。调查结果揭示了三个关键结果。一是大力推动节能电器销售。然而,最畅销的产品、主导品牌和领先平台占据了不成比例的政策利益份额。第二,在区域层面上,政策对发达地区的影响明显强于欠发达地区。三是高能耗地区节能产品补贴比例提高。这突出了效率与公平目标之间的内在权衡。基于这些发现,我们建议具体的政策设计改进,旨在减轻补贴实施过程中可能出现的分配不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The distributional effects of inclusive energy-efficiency subsidies: An empirical study of multi-dimensional Matthew effects.

Energy-efficiency subsidies are inclusive policies designed to promote a green transition for consumers. However, the fairness of their subsidy distribution has received insufficient attention. This study uses China's 2024 Energy-Efficiency Subsidy (EES) policy for home appliances as a quasi-natural experiment. We analyze high-frequency panel data from the JD.com platform, covering 12,936 products and comprising 1,552,320 daily observations spanning 120 days. Employing a difference-in-differences approach, we empirically evaluate the distributional effects of EES across multiple dimensions. The findings revealed three key results. First, EES significantly boosted sales of energy-efficient appliances. However, best-selling products, dominant brands, and leading platforms captured a disproportionate share of the policy benefits. Second, at the regional level, the policy's impact was significantly stronger in developed regions compared to less developed ones. Third, regions with high energy consumption received a larger share of subsidies for energy-efficient products. This highlights the inherent trade-off between efficiency and equity goals. Based on these findings, we recommend specific policy design refinements aimed at mitigating the distributional inequalities that can arise during subsidy implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信