对“能力与道德的行为信任：差异与相似的实验证据”的修正

IF 1.4 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1002/bdm.70047

{"title":"对“能力与道德的行为信任：差异与相似的实验证据”的修正","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fetchenhauer, D., Dunning, D., Ehlebracht, D., Graczyk, T., Schlosser, T., Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 38(4), e70037. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70037.\n The funding statement for this article was missing. The below funding statement has been added to the article:Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.We apologize for this error.","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bdm.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Behavioral Trust in Competence Versus Morality: Experimental Evidence of Differences and Similarities”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdm.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fetchenhauer, D., Dunning, D., Ehlebracht, D., Graczyk, T., Schlosser, T., Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 38(4), e70037. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70037.\\n The funding statement for this article was missing. The below funding statement has been added to the article:Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.We apologize for this error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bdm.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

李建军，李建军，李建军，李建军。行为决策研究进展，2011(4),37 - 37。https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70037。这篇文章的资助声明缺失了。文章中增加了以下资助声明：由Projekt DEAL支持和组织的开放获取资助。我们为这个错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Correction to “Behavioral Trust in Competence Versus Morality: Experimental Evidence of Differences and Similarities”

查看原文本刊更多论文

Correction to “Behavioral Trust in Competence Versus Morality: Experimental Evidence of Differences and Similarities”

Fetchenhauer, D., Dunning, D., Ehlebracht, D., Graczyk, T., Schlosser, T., Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 38(4), e70037. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70037.

The funding statement for this article was missing. The below funding statement has been added to the article:

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

We apologize for this error.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

5.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.