Yinghuan Xie, Paul Spence, Stuart Corney, Michael D. Tyka, Lennart T. Bach
{"title":"模式分辨率对海气二氧化碳平衡时间尺度的影响","authors":"Yinghuan Xie, Paul Spence, Stuart Corney, Michael D. Tyka, Lennart T. Bach","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal (mCDR) will likely play a role in efforts to keep global warming below 2°C. mCDR methods create a deficit in dissolved seawater CO<sub>2</sub> relative to the unperturbed counterfactual. This seawater CO<sub>2</sub> deficit induces either an uptake of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> or reduced CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing into the atmosphere. The immediate climatic benefit of mCDR depends on air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration before the CO<sub>2</sub> depleted seawater deficit in the surface ocean loses contact with the atmosphere through water mass ventilation. Air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration occurs over vast ocean regions, which are too large to constrain equilibration with current observational methods. As such, numerical modeling is needed to evaluate the spatial and temporal scales of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration. This study employs the ACCESS-OM2 model at three resolutions (0.1°, 0.25°, and 1°) to evaluate the dependency of simulated equilibration timescales on model resolution. Results indicate that model resolution has limited influence on equilibration timescales in the tropics but exerts a more significant effect in polar regions. The main reason for the simulated differences is that different resolutions advect CO<sub>2</sub>-deficient seawater into different locations (horizontally and vertically) where air-sea exchange can occur at different rates. The comparison of our results with simulations made with other ocean models further suggests that differences due to model resolution are smaller than differences between different models of similar resolutions. Our results are one step forward in evaluating the robustness of model-based assessments of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration timescales.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Model Resolution on Air-Sea CO2 Equilibration Timescales\",\"authors\":\"Yinghuan Xie, Paul Spence, Stuart Corney, Michael D. Tyka, Lennart T. Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GB008482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal (mCDR) will likely play a role in efforts to keep global warming below 2°C. mCDR methods create a deficit in dissolved seawater CO<sub>2</sub> relative to the unperturbed counterfactual. This seawater CO<sub>2</sub> deficit induces either an uptake of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> or reduced CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing into the atmosphere. The immediate climatic benefit of mCDR depends on air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration before the CO<sub>2</sub> depleted seawater deficit in the surface ocean loses contact with the atmosphere through water mass ventilation. Air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration occurs over vast ocean regions, which are too large to constrain equilibration with current observational methods. As such, numerical modeling is needed to evaluate the spatial and temporal scales of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration. This study employs the ACCESS-OM2 model at three resolutions (0.1°, 0.25°, and 1°) to evaluate the dependency of simulated equilibration timescales on model resolution. Results indicate that model resolution has limited influence on equilibration timescales in the tropics but exerts a more significant effect in polar regions. The main reason for the simulated differences is that different resolutions advect CO<sub>2</sub>-deficient seawater into different locations (horizontally and vertically) where air-sea exchange can occur at different rates. The comparison of our results with simulations made with other ocean models further suggests that differences due to model resolution are smaller than differences between different models of similar resolutions. Our results are one step forward in evaluating the robustness of model-based assessments of air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration timescales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008482\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008482\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Model Resolution on Air-Sea CO2 Equilibration Timescales
Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal (mCDR) will likely play a role in efforts to keep global warming below 2°C. mCDR methods create a deficit in dissolved seawater CO2 relative to the unperturbed counterfactual. This seawater CO2 deficit induces either an uptake of atmospheric CO2 or reduced CO2 outgassing into the atmosphere. The immediate climatic benefit of mCDR depends on air-sea CO2 equilibration before the CO2 depleted seawater deficit in the surface ocean loses contact with the atmosphere through water mass ventilation. Air-sea CO2 equilibration occurs over vast ocean regions, which are too large to constrain equilibration with current observational methods. As such, numerical modeling is needed to evaluate the spatial and temporal scales of air-sea CO2 equilibration. This study employs the ACCESS-OM2 model at three resolutions (0.1°, 0.25°, and 1°) to evaluate the dependency of simulated equilibration timescales on model resolution. Results indicate that model resolution has limited influence on equilibration timescales in the tropics but exerts a more significant effect in polar regions. The main reason for the simulated differences is that different resolutions advect CO2-deficient seawater into different locations (horizontally and vertically) where air-sea exchange can occur at different rates. The comparison of our results with simulations made with other ocean models further suggests that differences due to model resolution are smaller than differences between different models of similar resolutions. Our results are one step forward in evaluating the robustness of model-based assessments of air-sea CO2 equilibration timescales.
期刊介绍:
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.