为痴呆症患者设计辅助技术的用户界面:一个系统的范围审查

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ruby Lipson-Smith, Sahba Monzaviyan, Mina Aghaei, Madeleine J. Cannings, Riley Nicholson, Ruth Brookman, Celia B. Harris
{"title":"为痴呆症患者设计辅助技术的用户界面:一个系统的范围审查","authors":"Ruby Lipson-Smith,&nbsp;Sahba Monzaviyan,&nbsp;Mina Aghaei,&nbsp;Madeleine J. Cannings,&nbsp;Riley Nicholson,&nbsp;Ruth Brookman,&nbsp;Celia B. Harris","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/3850397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assistive technologies may have an important role in fulfilling unmet needs and increasing quality of life for people living with dementia. The type and design of user interfaces (e.g. touchscreen and voice activation) may impact how people with dementia use these technologies. We aimed to understand which types of user interfaces have been developed for this population, how interfaces are chosen, how their effectiveness is tested and what recommendations there are for optimizing interface design for people with dementia. This systematic scoping review summarized findings from 87 journal articles. Two-thirds of included studies incorporated codesign. Very few (14%) experimentally tested the effectiveness of a user interface, and many lacked ecological validity (52%). Common recommendations for user interface design included tailoring the interface to the user, providing multiple modalities, and incorporating principles of universal design. Training users on how to interface with the technology may not be beneficial for devices that are intended to be used entirely independently by a person living with dementia. Instead, designers should focus on harnessing retained or existing skills so that interaction is intuitive. More research is needed that directly compares different interface options to each other to gain evidence of what is most useful for people with dementia, as well as technology development that is deeply and meaningfully grounded in the lived experiences, values, preferences and priorities of people living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/3850397","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing User Interfaces of Assistive Technology for People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Ruby Lipson-Smith,&nbsp;Sahba Monzaviyan,&nbsp;Mina Aghaei,&nbsp;Madeleine J. Cannings,&nbsp;Riley Nicholson,&nbsp;Ruth Brookman,&nbsp;Celia B. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hbe2/3850397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Assistive technologies may have an important role in fulfilling unmet needs and increasing quality of life for people living with dementia. The type and design of user interfaces (e.g. touchscreen and voice activation) may impact how people with dementia use these technologies. We aimed to understand which types of user interfaces have been developed for this population, how interfaces are chosen, how their effectiveness is tested and what recommendations there are for optimizing interface design for people with dementia. This systematic scoping review summarized findings from 87 journal articles. Two-thirds of included studies incorporated codesign. Very few (14%) experimentally tested the effectiveness of a user interface, and many lacked ecological validity (52%). Common recommendations for user interface design included tailoring the interface to the user, providing multiple modalities, and incorporating principles of universal design. Training users on how to interface with the technology may not be beneficial for devices that are intended to be used entirely independently by a person living with dementia. Instead, designers should focus on harnessing retained or existing skills so that interaction is intuitive. More research is needed that directly compares different interface options to each other to gain evidence of what is most useful for people with dementia, as well as technology development that is deeply and meaningfully grounded in the lived experiences, values, preferences and priorities of people living with dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/3850397\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/3850397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/3850397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助技术可能在满足未满足的需求和提高痴呆症患者的生活质量方面发挥重要作用。用户界面的类型和设计(例如触摸屏和语音激活)可能会影响痴呆症患者如何使用这些技术。我们的目标是了解为这一人群开发了哪些类型的用户界面,如何选择界面,如何测试其有效性,以及有什么建议可以优化痴呆症患者的界面设计。这个系统的范围综述总结了来自87篇期刊文章的发现。三分之二的纳入研究纳入了共同设计。很少(14%)通过实验测试了用户界面的有效性,许多缺乏生态有效性(52%)。用户界面设计的常用建议包括为用户量身定制界面,提供多种模式,并结合通用设计原则。培训用户如何使用该技术可能对痴呆症患者完全独立使用的设备没有好处。相反,设计师应该专注于利用保留的或现有的技能,这样交互就更直观了。需要进行更多的研究,直接比较不同的界面选项,以获得对痴呆症患者最有用的证据,以及深刻而有意义地基于痴呆症患者的生活经历、价值观、偏好和优先事项的技术开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designing User Interfaces of Assistive Technology for People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Scoping Review

Designing User Interfaces of Assistive Technology for People Living With Dementia: A Systematic Scoping Review

Assistive technologies may have an important role in fulfilling unmet needs and increasing quality of life for people living with dementia. The type and design of user interfaces (e.g. touchscreen and voice activation) may impact how people with dementia use these technologies. We aimed to understand which types of user interfaces have been developed for this population, how interfaces are chosen, how their effectiveness is tested and what recommendations there are for optimizing interface design for people with dementia. This systematic scoping review summarized findings from 87 journal articles. Two-thirds of included studies incorporated codesign. Very few (14%) experimentally tested the effectiveness of a user interface, and many lacked ecological validity (52%). Common recommendations for user interface design included tailoring the interface to the user, providing multiple modalities, and incorporating principles of universal design. Training users on how to interface with the technology may not be beneficial for devices that are intended to be used entirely independently by a person living with dementia. Instead, designers should focus on harnessing retained or existing skills so that interaction is intuitive. More research is needed that directly compares different interface options to each other to gain evidence of what is most useful for people with dementia, as well as technology development that is deeply and meaningfully grounded in the lived experiences, values, preferences and priorities of people living with dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信