地中海盆地国家两种主要布鲁氏菌耐药模式的综合meta分析

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Atef Oreiby, Hazim O. Khalifa, Mohamed A. A. Abdelhamid, Mohamed Borham, Ayman S. Seada, Ragab M. Fereig, Robert Barigye, Gobena Ameni, Arve Lee Willingham, Yamen Hegazy
{"title":"地中海盆地国家两种主要布鲁氏菌耐药模式的综合meta分析","authors":"Atef Oreiby,&nbsp;Hazim O. Khalifa,&nbsp;Mohamed A. A. Abdelhamid,&nbsp;Mohamed Borham,&nbsp;Ayman S. Seada,&nbsp;Ragab M. Fereig,&nbsp;Robert Barigye,&nbsp;Gobena Ameni,&nbsp;Arve Lee Willingham,&nbsp;Yamen Hegazy","doi":"10.1155/tbed/2502968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of brucellosis major causative bacteria <i>Brucella abortus</i> and <i>Brucella melitensis</i> is complicating human treatment strategies in the Mediterranean basin, where the disease was first reported and is still endemic. The current meta-analysis examines the prevalence and patterns of AMR in 119 <i>Brucella abortus</i> and 1344 <i>Brucella melitensis</i> isolates across Mediterranean countries, highlighting significant geographical disparities in resistance data. The E-test and disc diffusion were mostly used for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility, which was validated by the CLSI guidelines of <i>Haemophilus</i> spp. or bacteria of bioterrorism. Genotypic detection of resistance was conducted in a few studies. Despite the documented burden of brucellosis, studies on AMR remain scarce, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, and several European Mediterranean nations. Comparative phenotypic–genotypic resistograms were reported in only a few studies, yet they are essential for understanding the mechanisms of AMR in this serious zoonotic pathogen. The analysis revealed a high overall AMR proportion (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%–51%) with considerable heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Notable differences in resistance were observed between regions, with African Mediterranean countries exhibiting the highest resistance rates (71%, 95% CI: 44%–94%) and European Mediterranean countries the lowest (9%, 95% CI: 0%–42%). Eastern Mediterranean countries exhibited higher resistance rates than their western counterparts (<i>p</i> = 0.11). <i>Brucella abortus</i> showed higher resistance (63%, 95% CI: 25%–95%) than <i>Brucella melitensis</i> (24%, 95% CI: 8%–43%). Isolates of bovine origin displayed the highest percentage of resistance (89%, 95% CI: 69%–100%) compared to isolates of other origins. Resistance to rifampicin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was generally low, but macrolide resistance, especially to azithromycin, was notably higher in African countries (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). This study underscores the need for standardized AMR surveillance based on Brucella-specific validation criteria, which are lacking, improved testing methodologies, and region-specific interventions to address AMR in brucellosis, particularly in livestock, where resistance is more prevalent. The findings highlight the importance of targeted antibiotic stewardship and monitoring to mitigate the spread of resistant Brucella strains and protect public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2502968","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the Two Major Brucella species in Mediterranean Basin Countries\",\"authors\":\"Atef Oreiby,&nbsp;Hazim O. Khalifa,&nbsp;Mohamed A. A. Abdelhamid,&nbsp;Mohamed Borham,&nbsp;Ayman S. Seada,&nbsp;Ragab M. Fereig,&nbsp;Robert Barigye,&nbsp;Gobena Ameni,&nbsp;Arve Lee Willingham,&nbsp;Yamen Hegazy\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tbed/2502968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of brucellosis major causative bacteria <i>Brucella abortus</i> and <i>Brucella melitensis</i> is complicating human treatment strategies in the Mediterranean basin, where the disease was first reported and is still endemic. The current meta-analysis examines the prevalence and patterns of AMR in 119 <i>Brucella abortus</i> and 1344 <i>Brucella melitensis</i> isolates across Mediterranean countries, highlighting significant geographical disparities in resistance data. The E-test and disc diffusion were mostly used for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility, which was validated by the CLSI guidelines of <i>Haemophilus</i> spp. or bacteria of bioterrorism. Genotypic detection of resistance was conducted in a few studies. Despite the documented burden of brucellosis, studies on AMR remain scarce, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, and several European Mediterranean nations. Comparative phenotypic–genotypic resistograms were reported in only a few studies, yet they are essential for understanding the mechanisms of AMR in this serious zoonotic pathogen. The analysis revealed a high overall AMR proportion (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%–51%) with considerable heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Notable differences in resistance were observed between regions, with African Mediterranean countries exhibiting the highest resistance rates (71%, 95% CI: 44%–94%) and European Mediterranean countries the lowest (9%, 95% CI: 0%–42%). Eastern Mediterranean countries exhibited higher resistance rates than their western counterparts (<i>p</i> = 0.11). <i>Brucella abortus</i> showed higher resistance (63%, 95% CI: 25%–95%) than <i>Brucella melitensis</i> (24%, 95% CI: 8%–43%). Isolates of bovine origin displayed the highest percentage of resistance (89%, 95% CI: 69%–100%) compared to isolates of other origins. Resistance to rifampicin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was generally low, but macrolide resistance, especially to azithromycin, was notably higher in African countries (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). This study underscores the need for standardized AMR surveillance based on Brucella-specific validation criteria, which are lacking, improved testing methodologies, and region-specific interventions to address AMR in brucellosis, particularly in livestock, where resistance is more prevalent. The findings highlight the importance of targeted antibiotic stewardship and monitoring to mitigate the spread of resistant Brucella strains and protect public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2502968\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2502968\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2502968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布鲁氏菌病主要致病菌流产布鲁氏菌和melitensis布鲁氏菌的抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)使地中海盆地的人类治疗战略复杂化,该疾病在该盆地首次报告并仍在流行。当前的荟萃分析检查了地中海国家119株流产布鲁氏菌和1344株melitensis布鲁氏菌的AMR流行率和模式,突出了耐药数据的显著地理差异。抗生素敏感性的测定多采用e试验和纸片扩散法,并得到了嗜血杆菌(Haemophilus sp .)或生物恐怖主义细菌CLSI指南的验证。在一些研究中进行了抗性基因型检测。尽管记录了布鲁氏菌病的负担,但对抗菌素耐药性的研究仍然很少,特别是在北非、中东和几个欧洲地中海国家。比较表型-基因型电阻图仅在少数研究中报道,但它们对于了解这种严重的人畜共患病原体的AMR机制至关重要。分析显示,总体AMR比例较高(32%,95%可信区间[CI]: 16%-51%),且具有相当大的异质性(I2 = 97%, p < 0.01)。各区域之间的耐药性存在显著差异,非洲地中海国家的耐药率最高(71%,95% CI: 44%-94%),欧洲地中海国家的耐药率最低(9%,95% CI: 0%-42%)。东地中海国家的耐药率高于西方国家(p = 0.11)。流产布鲁氏菌的耐药性(63%,95% CI: 25% ~ 95%)高于melitensis (24%, 95% CI: 8% ~ 43%)。与其他来源的分离株相比,牛源分离株显示出最高的抗性百分比(89%,95% CI: 69%-100%)。对利福平和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的耐药性普遍较低,但非洲国家对大环内酯类药物的耐药性,特别是对阿奇霉素的耐药性明显较高(p < 0.01)。这项研究强调,需要根据缺乏的布鲁氏菌特异性验证标准、改进的检测方法和针对区域的干预措施进行标准化的抗菌素耐药性监测,以解决布鲁氏菌病中的抗菌素耐药性问题,特别是在耐药性更为普遍的牲畜中。这些发现强调了有针对性的抗生素管理和监测对于减轻耐药布鲁氏菌菌株的传播和保护公众健康的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the Two Major Brucella species in Mediterranean Basin Countries

A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the Two Major Brucella species in Mediterranean Basin Countries

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of brucellosis major causative bacteria Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis is complicating human treatment strategies in the Mediterranean basin, where the disease was first reported and is still endemic. The current meta-analysis examines the prevalence and patterns of AMR in 119 Brucella abortus and 1344 Brucella melitensis isolates across Mediterranean countries, highlighting significant geographical disparities in resistance data. The E-test and disc diffusion were mostly used for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility, which was validated by the CLSI guidelines of Haemophilus spp. or bacteria of bioterrorism. Genotypic detection of resistance was conducted in a few studies. Despite the documented burden of brucellosis, studies on AMR remain scarce, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, and several European Mediterranean nations. Comparative phenotypic–genotypic resistograms were reported in only a few studies, yet they are essential for understanding the mechanisms of AMR in this serious zoonotic pathogen. The analysis revealed a high overall AMR proportion (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%–51%) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, p < 0.01). Notable differences in resistance were observed between regions, with African Mediterranean countries exhibiting the highest resistance rates (71%, 95% CI: 44%–94%) and European Mediterranean countries the lowest (9%, 95% CI: 0%–42%). Eastern Mediterranean countries exhibited higher resistance rates than their western counterparts (p = 0.11). Brucella abortus showed higher resistance (63%, 95% CI: 25%–95%) than Brucella melitensis (24%, 95% CI: 8%–43%). Isolates of bovine origin displayed the highest percentage of resistance (89%, 95% CI: 69%–100%) compared to isolates of other origins. Resistance to rifampicin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was generally low, but macrolide resistance, especially to azithromycin, was notably higher in African countries (p < 0.01). This study underscores the need for standardized AMR surveillance based on Brucella-specific validation criteria, which are lacking, improved testing methodologies, and region-specific interventions to address AMR in brucellosis, particularly in livestock, where resistance is more prevalent. The findings highlight the importance of targeted antibiotic stewardship and monitoring to mitigate the spread of resistant Brucella strains and protect public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信