Vishesh Shukla, Ashutosh Mishra, Anil Kumar, Ravi Prakash Tewari
{"title":"不同速度下磷酸铁锂电池几何相关的动态冲击行为:实验与数值方法","authors":"Vishesh Shukla, Ashutosh Mishra, Anil Kumar, Ravi Prakash Tewari","doi":"10.1002/ente.202402197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work reports the drop weight impact tests with 18650 lithium–iron phosphate batteries (LFPB) at different impact velocities (1.04, 1.26, 1.36, and 1.69 m s<sup>−1</sup>) at 0% and 50% state of charge (SOC). The investigation is extended for other battery geometry namely, 22650, 26650, and 32650. The thermal runaway triggering point is characterized by the event of internal short-circuit (ISC) resulting in voltage drop. The voltage drop phenomenon is ruled out to be present in the case of the tests at SOC 0%, while it is noticed for velocities 1.26 m s<sup>−1</sup> and above at SOC 50%. For SOC 50%, the voltage-time curve exhibits 87.5% and 21.2% drop corresponding to the highest and lowest impact velocity respectively. Further, the dynamic impact behavior is numerically simulated. The findings shows that the ultimate stress observed is maximum (0.53 MPa) for 32650 while it is minimum (0.47 MPa) for 22650 corresponding to SOC 0%. On the other hand, the ultimate stress is found to be maximum (0.68 MPa) for 22650 and minimum (0.47 MPa) for 26650. The outperformance of LFPB 26650 is observed in terms of its dynamic impact behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":11573,"journal":{"name":"Energy technology","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometry-Dependent Dynamic Impact Behavior of Lithium–Iron Phosphate Batteries at Different Velocities: An Experimental and Numerical Approach\",\"authors\":\"Vishesh Shukla, Ashutosh Mishra, Anil Kumar, Ravi Prakash Tewari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ente.202402197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present work reports the drop weight impact tests with 18650 lithium–iron phosphate batteries (LFPB) at different impact velocities (1.04, 1.26, 1.36, and 1.69 m s<sup>−1</sup>) at 0% and 50% state of charge (SOC). The investigation is extended for other battery geometry namely, 22650, 26650, and 32650. The thermal runaway triggering point is characterized by the event of internal short-circuit (ISC) resulting in voltage drop. The voltage drop phenomenon is ruled out to be present in the case of the tests at SOC 0%, while it is noticed for velocities 1.26 m s<sup>−1</sup> and above at SOC 50%. For SOC 50%, the voltage-time curve exhibits 87.5% and 21.2% drop corresponding to the highest and lowest impact velocity respectively. Further, the dynamic impact behavior is numerically simulated. The findings shows that the ultimate stress observed is maximum (0.53 MPa) for 32650 while it is minimum (0.47 MPa) for 22650 corresponding to SOC 0%. On the other hand, the ultimate stress is found to be maximum (0.68 MPa) for 22650 and minimum (0.47 MPa) for 26650. The outperformance of LFPB 26650 is observed in terms of its dynamic impact behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy technology\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ente.202402197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ente.202402197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文报道了18650磷酸锂铁电池(LFPB)在0%和50%荷电状态(SOC)下的不同冲击速度(1.04、1.26、1.36和1.69 m s - 1)下的落锤冲击试验。该研究扩展到其他电池几何形状,即22650、26650和32650。热失控触发点的特征是内部短路(ISC)导致电压下降。在荷电状态为0%的情况下,排除了电压降现象,而在荷电状态为50%及以上的速度为1.26 m s - 1时,则注意到这种现象。当SOC为50%时,冲击速度最高和最低时,电压-时间曲线分别下降87.5%和21.2%。此外,还对其动态冲击特性进行了数值模拟。结果表明,当固载率为0%时,32650的极限应力最大(0.53 MPa), 22650的极限应力最小(0.47 MPa)。另一方面,极限应力22650最大(0.68 MPa), 26650最小(0.47 MPa)。LFPB 26650在动态冲击性能方面表现出优异的性能。
Geometry-Dependent Dynamic Impact Behavior of Lithium–Iron Phosphate Batteries at Different Velocities: An Experimental and Numerical Approach
The present work reports the drop weight impact tests with 18650 lithium–iron phosphate batteries (LFPB) at different impact velocities (1.04, 1.26, 1.36, and 1.69 m s−1) at 0% and 50% state of charge (SOC). The investigation is extended for other battery geometry namely, 22650, 26650, and 32650. The thermal runaway triggering point is characterized by the event of internal short-circuit (ISC) resulting in voltage drop. The voltage drop phenomenon is ruled out to be present in the case of the tests at SOC 0%, while it is noticed for velocities 1.26 m s−1 and above at SOC 50%. For SOC 50%, the voltage-time curve exhibits 87.5% and 21.2% drop corresponding to the highest and lowest impact velocity respectively. Further, the dynamic impact behavior is numerically simulated. The findings shows that the ultimate stress observed is maximum (0.53 MPa) for 32650 while it is minimum (0.47 MPa) for 22650 corresponding to SOC 0%. On the other hand, the ultimate stress is found to be maximum (0.68 MPa) for 22650 and minimum (0.47 MPa) for 26650. The outperformance of LFPB 26650 is observed in terms of its dynamic impact behavior.
期刊介绍:
Energy Technology provides a forum for researchers and engineers from all relevant disciplines concerned with the generation, conversion, storage, and distribution of energy.
This new journal shall publish articles covering all technical aspects of energy process engineering from different perspectives, e.g.,
new concepts of energy generation and conversion;
design, operation, control, and optimization of processes for energy generation (e.g., carbon capture) and conversion of energy carriers;
improvement of existing processes;
combination of single components to systems for energy generation;
design of systems for energy storage;
production processes of fuels, e.g., hydrogen, electricity, petroleum, biobased fuels;
concepts and design of devices for energy distribution.