个体特征与社会因素对流产污名的交互作用

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Iraklis Grigoropoulos, Demos Michael
{"title":"个体特征与社会因素对流产污名的交互作用","authors":"Iraklis Grigoropoulos,&nbsp;Demos Michael","doi":"10.1111/asap.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Abortion stigma is a morally and politically divisive issue, often framed through reductive binaries that equate support for abortion with empathy and opposition with moral deficiency. This study explores how prosocial personality traits (i.e., the Light Triad), religiosity, and political ideology interact in shaping stigmatizing attitudes toward abortion. A sample of 304 participants engaged in a survey from October to November 2024, completed measures assessing abortion stigma, Light Triad traits, religiosity, and political orientation. Structural equation modeling revealed that higher Light Triad traits predicted lower abortion stigma. However, this relationship was moderated by political ideology: among conservatives, prosocial traits had a diminished—or even reversed—association with stigma. These findings challenge the notion that moral reasoning on abortion is unidimensional and highlight the role of ideological context in directing moral concern. The study underscores the need for stigma-reduction strategies that consider not only individual empathy but also group norms and ideological commitments that shape how that empathy is expressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interaction between individual traits and societal factors in predicting abortion stigma\",\"authors\":\"Iraklis Grigoropoulos,&nbsp;Demos Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asap.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Abortion stigma is a morally and politically divisive issue, often framed through reductive binaries that equate support for abortion with empathy and opposition with moral deficiency. This study explores how prosocial personality traits (i.e., the Light Triad), religiosity, and political ideology interact in shaping stigmatizing attitudes toward abortion. A sample of 304 participants engaged in a survey from October to November 2024, completed measures assessing abortion stigma, Light Triad traits, religiosity, and political orientation. Structural equation modeling revealed that higher Light Triad traits predicted lower abortion stigma. However, this relationship was moderated by political ideology: among conservatives, prosocial traits had a diminished—or even reversed—association with stigma. These findings challenge the notion that moral reasoning on abortion is unidimensional and highlight the role of ideological context in directing moral concern. The study underscores the need for stigma-reduction strategies that consider not only individual empathy but also group norms and ideological commitments that shape how that empathy is expressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.70038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

堕胎的污名是一个道德和政治上都存在分歧的问题,通常是通过将支持堕胎与同情等同起来,将反对堕胎与道德缺陷等同起来的二元论来框定的。本研究探讨了亲社会人格特征(即光明三合一)、宗教信仰和政治意识形态如何相互作用,形成对堕胎的污名化态度。2024年10月至11月,304名参与者参与了一项调查,他们完成了对堕胎耻辱、光明三人格特征、宗教信仰和政治取向的评估。结构方程模型表明,光三联征特征越高,流产柱头越低。然而,这种关系被政治意识形态所缓和:在保守派中,亲社会特质与耻辱的关联减弱,甚至相反。这些发现挑战了关于堕胎的道德推理是单向度的观念,并强调了意识形态背景在指导道德关注方面的作用。这项研究强调了减少耻辱感的策略的必要性,这些策略不仅要考虑个人的同理心,还要考虑影响这种同理心表达方式的群体规范和意识形态承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The interaction between individual traits and societal factors in predicting abortion stigma

The interaction between individual traits and societal factors in predicting abortion stigma

Abortion stigma is a morally and politically divisive issue, often framed through reductive binaries that equate support for abortion with empathy and opposition with moral deficiency. This study explores how prosocial personality traits (i.e., the Light Triad), religiosity, and political ideology interact in shaping stigmatizing attitudes toward abortion. A sample of 304 participants engaged in a survey from October to November 2024, completed measures assessing abortion stigma, Light Triad traits, religiosity, and political orientation. Structural equation modeling revealed that higher Light Triad traits predicted lower abortion stigma. However, this relationship was moderated by political ideology: among conservatives, prosocial traits had a diminished—or even reversed—association with stigma. These findings challenge the notion that moral reasoning on abortion is unidimensional and highlight the role of ideological context in directing moral concern. The study underscores the need for stigma-reduction strategies that consider not only individual empathy but also group norms and ideological commitments that shape how that empathy is expressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信