麻醉医师关于围手术期神经认知功能障碍的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rui Zhou, Yumeng Fu, Xinmin Yan, Baoli Cheng
{"title":"麻醉医师关于围手术期神经认知功能障碍的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究","authors":"Rui Zhou,&nbsp;Yumeng Fu,&nbsp;Xinmin Yan,&nbsp;Baoli Cheng","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7302873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed anesthesiologists’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND). This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among anesthesiologists in mainland China from February 23, 2024, to March 23, 2024. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect demographic information and assess KAP scores. Finally, 594 nonproblematic questionnaires were included. Among the respondents, 311 (52.36%) were male, and 172 (28.96%) had received training related to PND. The mean scores for the KAP dimensions were 8.98 ± 2.32 (range: 0–13), 35.53 ± 3.00 (range: 8–40), and 28.49 ± 6.70 (range: 8–40), respectively. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher knowledge scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.099, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012–1.194, <i>p</i> = 0.025), higher attitude scores (OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.043–1.188, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and participation in PND-related training (OR = 2.876, 95% CI: 1.973–4.207, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were associated with proactive practice. Path analysis revealed that knowledge was associated with attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.31, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and practice (<i>β</i> = 0.52, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and that attitude was associated with practice (<i>β</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Anesthesiologists in mainland China demonstrate limited knowledge but a positive attitude and a proactive approach to PND. Targeted educational interventions are recommended to improve anesthesiologists’ understanding and management of PND, enhancing perioperative care and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7302873","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Anesthesiologists Regarding Perioperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Rui Zhou,&nbsp;Yumeng Fu,&nbsp;Xinmin Yan,&nbsp;Baoli Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/7302873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study assessed anesthesiologists’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND). This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among anesthesiologists in mainland China from February 23, 2024, to March 23, 2024. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect demographic information and assess KAP scores. Finally, 594 nonproblematic questionnaires were included. Among the respondents, 311 (52.36%) were male, and 172 (28.96%) had received training related to PND. The mean scores for the KAP dimensions were 8.98 ± 2.32 (range: 0–13), 35.53 ± 3.00 (range: 8–40), and 28.49 ± 6.70 (range: 8–40), respectively. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher knowledge scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.099, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012–1.194, <i>p</i> = 0.025), higher attitude scores (OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.043–1.188, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and participation in PND-related training (OR = 2.876, 95% CI: 1.973–4.207, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were associated with proactive practice. Path analysis revealed that knowledge was associated with attitude (<i>β</i> = 0.31, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and practice (<i>β</i> = 0.52, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and that attitude was associated with practice (<i>β</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Anesthesiologists in mainland China demonstrate limited knowledge but a positive attitude and a proactive approach to PND. Targeted educational interventions are recommended to improve anesthesiologists’ understanding and management of PND, enhancing perioperative care and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7302873\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7302873\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7302873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了麻醉医师关于围手术期神经认知功能障碍(PND)的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。本多中心横断面研究于2024年2月23日至2024年3月23日在中国大陆的麻醉医师中进行。采用自填问卷收集人口统计信息并评估KAP分数。最后,包括594份无问题问卷。受访者中,男性311人(52.36%),接受过PND相关培训的172人(28.96%)。KAP各维度的平均得分分别为8.98±2.32(范围0 ~ 13)、35.53±3.00(范围8 ~ 40)和28.49±6.70(范围8 ~ 40)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,较高的知识得分(优势比[OR] = 1.099, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.012-1.194, p = 0.025)、较高的态度得分(OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.043-1.188, p = 0.001)和参加pnd相关培训(OR = 2.876, 95% CI: 1.973-4.207, p < 0.001)与主动实践相关。通径分析显示,知识与态度(β = 0.31, p < 0.001)和实践(β = 0.52, p < 0.001)相关,态度与实践(β = 0.29, p = 0.002)相关。中国大陆的麻醉师知识有限,但对PND有积极的态度和积极的态度。建议有针对性的教育干预,以提高麻醉医师对PND的理解和管理,加强围手术期护理和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Anesthesiologists Regarding Perioperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Anesthesiologists Regarding Perioperative Neurocognitive Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Study

This study assessed anesthesiologists’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND). This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted among anesthesiologists in mainland China from February 23, 2024, to March 23, 2024. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect demographic information and assess KAP scores. Finally, 594 nonproblematic questionnaires were included. Among the respondents, 311 (52.36%) were male, and 172 (28.96%) had received training related to PND. The mean scores for the KAP dimensions were 8.98 ± 2.32 (range: 0–13), 35.53 ± 3.00 (range: 8–40), and 28.49 ± 6.70 (range: 8–40), respectively. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher knowledge scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.099, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012–1.194, p = 0.025), higher attitude scores (OR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.043–1.188, p = 0.001), and participation in PND-related training (OR = 2.876, 95% CI: 1.973–4.207, p < 0.001) were associated with proactive practice. Path analysis revealed that knowledge was associated with attitude (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) and practice (β = 0.52, p < 0.001) and that attitude was associated with practice (β = 0.29, p = 0.002). Anesthesiologists in mainland China demonstrate limited knowledge but a positive attitude and a proactive approach to PND. Targeted educational interventions are recommended to improve anesthesiologists’ understanding and management of PND, enhancing perioperative care and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信