{"title":"术前尿培养结合结石直径常作为结石培养结果的指标","authors":"Dekai Hu, Defeng Ge, Jiashan Pan, Junzhi Zhang, Xiaowei Wang, Yang Chen, Zongyao Hao","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/6848449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The current clinical guidelines recommend routine stone bacterial culture for patients who have undergone stone surgery. However, the results of bacterial culture are obtained after several days, which delay the implementation of early treatment postsurgery. In this study, we performed stone bacterial culture for several surgical patients and predicted the results and types of stone bacterial culture based on specific parameters on admission. This case provides important clinical data that will guide the implementation of early detection and management of postoperative infections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent stone surgery between October 2023 and January 2024, all of whom underwent urine and stone bacterial culture were enrolled in the study. Their results were processed and compared using logistic regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 165 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom 57 had positive stone cultures, 37 had positive urine culture (UC), and 21 had both positive stone and urine cultures. Univariate analysis indicated that the positive stone cultures were associated with preoperative UC and preoperative use of antibiotics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that positive preoperative UC was a significant risk factor for stone culture (SC). Patients with consistent results in both UC and SC exhibited larger kidney stone diameters. Furthermore, the combination of UC and stone diameter could effectively predict the bacterial species of SC (AUC = 0.817).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with large-diameter kidney stones, the bacteria identified in UC were often similar to those detected in the SC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/6848449","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Urine Culture Combined With Stone Diameter Are Often Indicators of the Stone Culture Results\",\"authors\":\"Dekai Hu, Defeng Ge, Jiashan Pan, Junzhi Zhang, Xiaowei Wang, Yang Chen, Zongyao Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/6848449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current clinical guidelines recommend routine stone bacterial culture for patients who have undergone stone surgery. However, the results of bacterial culture are obtained after several days, which delay the implementation of early treatment postsurgery. In this study, we performed stone bacterial culture for several surgical patients and predicted the results and types of stone bacterial culture based on specific parameters on admission. This case provides important clinical data that will guide the implementation of early detection and management of postoperative infections.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent stone surgery between October 2023 and January 2024, all of whom underwent urine and stone bacterial culture were enrolled in the study. Their results were processed and compared using logistic regression analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 165 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom 57 had positive stone cultures, 37 had positive urine culture (UC), and 21 had both positive stone and urine cultures. Univariate analysis indicated that the positive stone cultures were associated with preoperative UC and preoperative use of antibiotics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that positive preoperative UC was a significant risk factor for stone culture (SC). Patients with consistent results in both UC and SC exhibited larger kidney stone diameters. Furthermore, the combination of UC and stone diameter could effectively predict the bacterial species of SC (AUC = 0.817).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients with large-diameter kidney stones, the bacteria identified in UC were often similar to those detected in the SC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/6848449\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/6848449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/6848449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preoperative Urine Culture Combined With Stone Diameter Are Often Indicators of the Stone Culture Results
Purpose
The current clinical guidelines recommend routine stone bacterial culture for patients who have undergone stone surgery. However, the results of bacterial culture are obtained after several days, which delay the implementation of early treatment postsurgery. In this study, we performed stone bacterial culture for several surgical patients and predicted the results and types of stone bacterial culture based on specific parameters on admission. This case provides important clinical data that will guide the implementation of early detection and management of postoperative infections.
Methods
Patients who underwent stone surgery between October 2023 and January 2024, all of whom underwent urine and stone bacterial culture were enrolled in the study. Their results were processed and compared using logistic regression analysis.
Results
A total of 165 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom 57 had positive stone cultures, 37 had positive urine culture (UC), and 21 had both positive stone and urine cultures. Univariate analysis indicated that the positive stone cultures were associated with preoperative UC and preoperative use of antibiotics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that positive preoperative UC was a significant risk factor for stone culture (SC). Patients with consistent results in both UC and SC exhibited larger kidney stone diameters. Furthermore, the combination of UC and stone diameter could effectively predict the bacterial species of SC (AUC = 0.817).
Conclusion
In patients with large-diameter kidney stones, the bacteria identified in UC were often similar to those detected in the SC.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.