David A. Dawson, Emily O'Donnell, Stephanie Bond, Thomas Willis, Jonathan Huck, Matthew Sherwood, Jonathan Moxon
{"title":"基于系统的洪水风险管理中洪源区(FSA)分析的从业者视角","authors":"David A. Dawson, Emily O'Donnell, Stephanie Bond, Thomas Willis, Jonathan Huck, Matthew Sherwood, Jonathan Moxon","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practitioner Perspectives of Flood Source Area (FSA) Analysis for System-Based Flood Risk Management\",\"authors\":\"David A. Dawson, Emily O'Donnell, Stephanie Bond, Thomas Willis, Jonathan Huck, Matthew Sherwood, Jonathan Moxon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Practitioner Perspectives of Flood Source Area (FSA) Analysis for System-Based Flood Risk Management
Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.