基于系统的洪水风险管理中洪源区(FSA)分析的从业者视角

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
David A. Dawson, Emily O'Donnell, Stephanie Bond, Thomas Willis, Jonathan Huck, Matthew Sherwood, Jonathan Moxon
{"title":"基于系统的洪水风险管理中洪源区(FSA)分析的从业者视角","authors":"David A. Dawson,&nbsp;Emily O'Donnell,&nbsp;Stephanie Bond,&nbsp;Thomas Willis,&nbsp;Jonathan Huck,&nbsp;Matthew Sherwood,&nbsp;Jonathan Moxon","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practitioner Perspectives of Flood Source Area (FSA) Analysis for System-Based Flood Risk Management\",\"authors\":\"David A. Dawson,&nbsp;Emily O'Donnell,&nbsp;Stephanie Bond,&nbsp;Thomas Willis,&nbsp;Jonathan Huck,&nbsp;Matthew Sherwood,&nbsp;Jonathan Moxon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70127\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市洪水风险管理(FRM)是为子孙后代开发有弹性的居住环境的关键方面。现在,它与通过蓝绿色基础设施和提供更广泛的共同利益来提高环境意识的要求相互关联。平衡城市发展与环境驱动因素和增强韧性的复杂性是城市战略决策的关键挑战。通过计算模型的发展,评估区域对洪水危害的空间贡献的新方法正在提高我们对流域响应的理解,以及我们开发多功能、多利益项目的能力。然而目前,这些方法在很大程度上仍停留在理论层面,或者是“最好的意图”。本研究采用了一种改编的“单位洪水响应”方法,为英国的一个城市集水区生成洪水源区(FSA)地图。采用以用户为中心的参与方法,使用FSA输出,从从业者的角度对其适用性产生关键见解。FSA模型确定了几个危险源,从上游的广泛贡献到下游的离散贡献。利益相关者得出结论,FSA可以通过提供更清晰的流域战略愿景来支持传统的“受体主导”决策,从而在前期规划阶段支持FRM。这一办法的额外好处是,改进了项目伙伴的确定和谈判,并有可能支持/确定与其他部门(例如住房和运输)现有和计划中的基础设施相结合的更大规模的选择。虽然FSA分析的计算方面可以改善模型稳健性(例如,校准,验证),但他们必须充分理解在地面上应用这些技术的实用性,证明与从业者和决策者共同开发研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Practitioner Perspectives of Flood Source Area (FSA) Analysis for System-Based Flood Risk Management

Practitioner Perspectives of Flood Source Area (FSA) Analysis for System-Based Flood Risk Management

Urban Flood Risk Management (FRM) is a critical aspect of developing resilient environments for future generations to inhabit. It is now interconnected with the requirement to be more environmentally conscious through blue-green infrastructure and the delivery of wider co-benefits. The complexity of balancing urban growth with environmental drivers and increasing resilience is a key challenge for strategic urban decision-making. Through computational modelling developments, new approaches to assess the spatial contribution of area to flood hazard are improving our understanding of the catchment response and our ability to develop multifunctional, multi-beneficial projects. Yet at present, these approaches remain largely theoretical or are a ‘best intention’. This study uses an adapted ‘Unit Flood Response’ approach to generate Flood Source Area (FSA) maps for an urban catchment in the UK. A user-focused engagement approach is applied using FSA outputs to generate key insight into its applicability from a practitioner perspective. The FSA modelling identified several hazard sources, from widespread contributions upstream to discrete contributions downstream. Stakeholders concluded that the FSA can support FRM at the pre-planning stage by providing a clearer strategic vision across the catchment to support traditional ‘receptor-led’ decision-making. Improved identification and negotiation of project partners and the potential to support/identify wider scale options that integrate with existing and planned infrastructure in other sectors, for example, housing and transport, were additional benefits of this approach. While the computational aspects of FSA analyses could be improved for model robustness (e.g., calibration, validation), they must do so with a full understanding of the practicalities of applying these techniques on the ground, demonstrating the importance of co-development of research with practitioners and decision-makers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信