电磁问题的一种基于代理的自适应采样方法

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Emmanouil Karantoumanis, Theodoros Zygiridis, Nikolaos Ploskas
{"title":"电磁问题的一种基于代理的自适应采样方法","authors":"Emmanouil Karantoumanis,&nbsp;Theodoros Zygiridis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Ploskas","doi":"10.1002/jnm.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Black-box optimization problems arise in many real-world applications, where the objective function is unknown or computationally expensive to evaluate. In electromagnetic engineering, optimization tasks often involve complex structures and materials, making direct analytical solutions infeasible. These problems are further complicated by high-dimensional search spaces, the need for numerous simulations, and the absence of explicit derivative information. Gradient-based optimization methods are often impractical due to the lack of gradients and high evaluation costs. Even derivative-free optimization (DFO) techniques may struggle with efficiency in high dimensions. To address these challenges, we implement a surrogate-based adaptive sampling DFO approach that refines a surrogate model while optimizing black-box electromagnetic problems. We focus on deterministic black-box functions with noise-free evaluations. Our methodology is demonstrated in two case studies: optimizing the reflection coefficient in a partially filled waveguide and the transmission properties of a multilayered dielectric filter. We compare our method against Monte Carlo, Polynomial Chaos, Genetic Algorithms, and Particle Swarm Optimization. We confirm that our approach achieves a better solution while maintaining high accuracy in the surrogate model, with significantly fewer simulations. For the waveguide problem, our method achieved a best value of 0.1325 using only 168 simulations, compared to 0.1374 with 100 million Monte Carlo samples and 0.1469 with 9180 Polynomial Chaos evaluations. In the filter case, we obtained 1.7113 GHz using 240 simulations, outperforming the 1.7682 GHz result from 5370 Polynomial Chaos samples. These results demonstrate a simulation cost reduction of over 95%–98%, while achieving improved optimization performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Numerical Modelling-Electronic Networks Devices and Fields","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jnm.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Surrogate-Based Adaptive Sampling Approach for Electromagnetic Problems\",\"authors\":\"Emmanouil Karantoumanis,&nbsp;Theodoros Zygiridis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Ploskas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jnm.70121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Black-box optimization problems arise in many real-world applications, where the objective function is unknown or computationally expensive to evaluate. In electromagnetic engineering, optimization tasks often involve complex structures and materials, making direct analytical solutions infeasible. These problems are further complicated by high-dimensional search spaces, the need for numerous simulations, and the absence of explicit derivative information. Gradient-based optimization methods are often impractical due to the lack of gradients and high evaluation costs. Even derivative-free optimization (DFO) techniques may struggle with efficiency in high dimensions. To address these challenges, we implement a surrogate-based adaptive sampling DFO approach that refines a surrogate model while optimizing black-box electromagnetic problems. We focus on deterministic black-box functions with noise-free evaluations. Our methodology is demonstrated in two case studies: optimizing the reflection coefficient in a partially filled waveguide and the transmission properties of a multilayered dielectric filter. We compare our method against Monte Carlo, Polynomial Chaos, Genetic Algorithms, and Particle Swarm Optimization. We confirm that our approach achieves a better solution while maintaining high accuracy in the surrogate model, with significantly fewer simulations. For the waveguide problem, our method achieved a best value of 0.1325 using only 168 simulations, compared to 0.1374 with 100 million Monte Carlo samples and 0.1469 with 9180 Polynomial Chaos evaluations. In the filter case, we obtained 1.7113 GHz using 240 simulations, outperforming the 1.7682 GHz result from 5370 Polynomial Chaos samples. These results demonstrate a simulation cost reduction of over 95%–98%, while achieving improved optimization performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Numerical Modelling-Electronic Networks Devices and Fields\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jnm.70121\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Numerical Modelling-Electronic Networks Devices and Fields\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnm.70121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Numerical Modelling-Electronic Networks Devices and Fields","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnm.70121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑盒优化问题出现在许多现实世界的应用中,其中目标函数是未知的或计算昂贵的评估。在电磁工程中,优化任务往往涉及复杂的结构和材料,这使得直接解析解是不可行的。这些问题由于高维搜索空间、大量模拟的需要以及缺乏明确的导数信息而进一步复杂化。基于梯度的优化方法往往是不切实际的,因为缺乏梯度和高的评估成本。即使是无导数优化(DFO)技术也可能在高维情况下与效率作斗争。为了解决这些挑战,我们实现了一种基于代理的自适应采样DFO方法,该方法在优化黑盒电磁问题的同时改进了代理模型。我们关注具有无噪声评估的确定性黑盒函数。我们的方法在两个案例研究中得到了证明:优化部分填充波导中的反射系数和多层介质滤波器的传输特性。我们比较了我们的方法与蒙特卡罗,多项式混沌,遗传算法和粒子群优化。我们证实,我们的方法实现了更好的解决方案,同时在代理模型中保持了较高的准确性,模拟次数明显减少。对于波导问题,我们的方法仅使用168次模拟就获得了0.1325的最佳值,相比之下,1亿个蒙特卡罗样本的最佳值为0.1374,9180次多项式混沌评估的最佳值为0.1469。在滤波情况下,我们通过240次模拟获得了1.7113 GHz,优于5370次多项式混沌样本的1.7682 GHz结果。这些结果表明,模拟成本降低了95%-98%以上,同时实现了改进的优化性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Surrogate-Based Adaptive Sampling Approach for Electromagnetic Problems

A Surrogate-Based Adaptive Sampling Approach for Electromagnetic Problems

Black-box optimization problems arise in many real-world applications, where the objective function is unknown or computationally expensive to evaluate. In electromagnetic engineering, optimization tasks often involve complex structures and materials, making direct analytical solutions infeasible. These problems are further complicated by high-dimensional search spaces, the need for numerous simulations, and the absence of explicit derivative information. Gradient-based optimization methods are often impractical due to the lack of gradients and high evaluation costs. Even derivative-free optimization (DFO) techniques may struggle with efficiency in high dimensions. To address these challenges, we implement a surrogate-based adaptive sampling DFO approach that refines a surrogate model while optimizing black-box electromagnetic problems. We focus on deterministic black-box functions with noise-free evaluations. Our methodology is demonstrated in two case studies: optimizing the reflection coefficient in a partially filled waveguide and the transmission properties of a multilayered dielectric filter. We compare our method against Monte Carlo, Polynomial Chaos, Genetic Algorithms, and Particle Swarm Optimization. We confirm that our approach achieves a better solution while maintaining high accuracy in the surrogate model, with significantly fewer simulations. For the waveguide problem, our method achieved a best value of 0.1325 using only 168 simulations, compared to 0.1374 with 100 million Monte Carlo samples and 0.1469 with 9180 Polynomial Chaos evaluations. In the filter case, we obtained 1.7113 GHz using 240 simulations, outperforming the 1.7682 GHz result from 5370 Polynomial Chaos samples. These results demonstrate a simulation cost reduction of over 95%–98%, while achieving improved optimization performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
101
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prediction through modelling forms the basis of engineering design. The computational power at the fingertips of the professional engineer is increasing enormously and techniques for computer simulation are changing rapidly. Engineers need models which relate to their design area and which are adaptable to new design concepts. They also need efficient and friendly ways of presenting, viewing and transmitting the data associated with their models. The International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields provides a communication vehicle for numerical modelling methods and data preparation methods associated with electrical and electronic circuits and fields. It concentrates on numerical modelling rather than abstract numerical mathematics. Contributions on numerical modelling will cover the entire subject of electrical and electronic engineering. They will range from electrical distribution networks to integrated circuits on VLSI design, and from static electric and magnetic fields through microwaves to optical design. They will also include the use of electrical networks as a modelling medium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信