隧道开挖引起的充填结构变形的数值研究

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Yalin Yu , Xiaoshuang Li , Feng Chen , Alec M. Marshall
{"title":"隧道开挖引起的充填结构变形的数值研究","authors":"Yalin Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Li ,&nbsp;Feng Chen ,&nbsp;Alec M. Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the critical influence of masonry infill nonlinearity on tunnelling-induced responses of frame structures, employing a validated Two-Stage Analysis Method (TSAM). Departing from conventional elastic approaches, a refined elastoplastic constitutive model (CDP<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup></math></span>) is implemented for the infills to accurately capture their role in structural damage evaluation. The analysis accounts for the full three-dimensional geometry of the infilled frames, including infill dimensions, column cross-sections, slab thicknesses, and the spans between adjacent columns and between floors. The research investigates the influence of building eccentricity (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span>), soil–structure interaction (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mtext>soil</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>), and frame–infill interface conditions (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mtext>infill</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>) on structural behaviour. For both the soil–foundation and frame–infill interfaces, contact conditions are varied from fully smooth to rough by adjusting the frictional coefficient based on a Coulomb friction law. For each parameter, two types of frames with different transverse widths are considered to assess the effect of building width on the response. Validation of the two-stage analysis method is conducted against centrifuge modelling tests and advanced geotechnical analyses of tunnelling beneath bare frames. Results reveal that elastic models underestimate shear distortion (<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>) and tensile strain (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>ɛ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>99</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>), particularly in symmetric configurations (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></math></span>) where infill plasticity dominates the response. This study proposes new guidelines to enhance current assessment frameworks for infilled frames, accounting for infill nonlinearity under different parameters of building eccentricity, soil–structure and frame-infill interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107125"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A numerical study for assessing tunnelling-induced distortions of infilled structures\",\"authors\":\"Yalin Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Li ,&nbsp;Feng Chen ,&nbsp;Alec M. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the critical influence of masonry infill nonlinearity on tunnelling-induced responses of frame structures, employing a validated Two-Stage Analysis Method (TSAM). Departing from conventional elastic approaches, a refined elastoplastic constitutive model (CDP<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup></math></span>) is implemented for the infills to accurately capture their role in structural damage evaluation. The analysis accounts for the full three-dimensional geometry of the infilled frames, including infill dimensions, column cross-sections, slab thicknesses, and the spans between adjacent columns and between floors. The research investigates the influence of building eccentricity (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span>), soil–structure interaction (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mtext>soil</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>), and frame–infill interface conditions (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mtext>infill</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>) on structural behaviour. For both the soil–foundation and frame–infill interfaces, contact conditions are varied from fully smooth to rough by adjusting the frictional coefficient based on a Coulomb friction law. For each parameter, two types of frames with different transverse widths are considered to assess the effect of building width on the response. Validation of the two-stage analysis method is conducted against centrifuge modelling tests and advanced geotechnical analyses of tunnelling beneath bare frames. Results reveal that elastic models underestimate shear distortion (<span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>) and tensile strain (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>ɛ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>99</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>), particularly in symmetric configurations (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></math></span>) where infill plasticity dominates the response. This study proposes new guidelines to enhance current assessment frameworks for infilled frames, accounting for infill nonlinearity under different parameters of building eccentricity, soil–structure and frame-infill interfaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007631\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用一种经过验证的两阶段分析方法(TSAM),研究砌体填筑非线性对框架结构隧道响应的关键影响。与传统的弹性方法不同,本文采用了一种改进的弹塑性本构模型(CDP∗),以准确地反映填料在结构损伤评估中的作用。该分析考虑了填充框架的完整三维几何形状,包括填充尺寸、柱截面、板厚度以及相邻柱之间和楼板之间的跨度。研究了建筑偏心(e/B)、土-结构相互作用(μsoil)和框架-填充界面条件(μ fill)对结构性能的影响。基于库仑摩擦定律,通过调整摩擦系数,将基础与框架-填充物界面的接触条件从完全光滑转变为粗糙。对于每个参数,考虑了两种不同横向宽度的框架,以评估建筑宽度对响应的影响。通过离心模拟试验和先进的裸框架下隧道岩土分析,验证了两阶段分析方法。结果表明,弹性模型低估了剪切变形(β)和拉伸应变(β 99t),特别是在对称配置(e/B=0)中,填充塑性主导响应。考虑到不同建筑偏心、土-结构和框架-填充界面参数下的填充非线性,本研究提出了新的指导方针,以改进现有的填充框架评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A numerical study for assessing tunnelling-induced distortions of infilled structures
This study investigates the critical influence of masonry infill nonlinearity on tunnelling-induced responses of frame structures, employing a validated Two-Stage Analysis Method (TSAM). Departing from conventional elastic approaches, a refined elastoplastic constitutive model (CDP) is implemented for the infills to accurately capture their role in structural damage evaluation. The analysis accounts for the full three-dimensional geometry of the infilled frames, including infill dimensions, column cross-sections, slab thicknesses, and the spans between adjacent columns and between floors. The research investigates the influence of building eccentricity (e/B), soil–structure interaction (μsoil), and frame–infill interface conditions (μinfill) on structural behaviour. For both the soil–foundation and frame–infill interfaces, contact conditions are varied from fully smooth to rough by adjusting the frictional coefficient based on a Coulomb friction law. For each parameter, two types of frames with different transverse widths are considered to assess the effect of building width on the response. Validation of the two-stage analysis method is conducted against centrifuge modelling tests and advanced geotechnical analyses of tunnelling beneath bare frames. Results reveal that elastic models underestimate shear distortion (β) and tensile strain (ɛ99t), particularly in symmetric configurations (e/B=0) where infill plasticity dominates the response. This study proposes new guidelines to enhance current assessment frameworks for infilled frames, accounting for infill nonlinearity under different parameters of building eccentricity, soil–structure and frame-infill interfaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信