{"title":"财富、数字设备的过度使用,以及不断变化的数字不平等现象","authors":"Soyoung Park","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wealth has long influenced digital inequality by shaping access to and benefits from technologies, yet its role in digital overuse—characterized by perceived dissatisfaction and negative consequences rather than mere screen time—remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between income and digital overuse, using data from the 2019–2022 Korean Smartphone Overuse Survey, with 101,625 respondents. Digital overuse is both defined and assessed in terms of self-control failure, behavioral salience, and negative after-effects, analyzed using quantile regression across income percentiles. This study examines whether the unintended consequences of digital engagement, like overuse, are also stratified along socioeconomic lines—just as the benefits of technology have been. To explore this, we test two hypotheses in the context of COVID-19: the Affluence Dependency Hypothesis, which suggests that affluent individuals are more prone to digital overuse due to greater access, and the Resourceful Autonomy Hypothesis, which posits that higher-income individuals are better able to regulate their usage. Results indicate that while affluent individuals exhibited higher overuse during the pandemic, this effect diminished by 2022, suggesting a recovery of control. By extending the discussion of digital inequality beyond access and benefits to include overuse, this study expands the landscape of digital inequalities, revealing a new form of stratification in which economic resources shape not only digital advantages but also the ability to mitigate digital risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 108805"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wealth, digital overuse, and the changing landscape of digital inequality\",\"authors\":\"Soyoung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wealth has long influenced digital inequality by shaping access to and benefits from technologies, yet its role in digital overuse—characterized by perceived dissatisfaction and negative consequences rather than mere screen time—remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between income and digital overuse, using data from the 2019–2022 Korean Smartphone Overuse Survey, with 101,625 respondents. Digital overuse is both defined and assessed in terms of self-control failure, behavioral salience, and negative after-effects, analyzed using quantile regression across income percentiles. This study examines whether the unintended consequences of digital engagement, like overuse, are also stratified along socioeconomic lines—just as the benefits of technology have been. To explore this, we test two hypotheses in the context of COVID-19: the Affluence Dependency Hypothesis, which suggests that affluent individuals are more prone to digital overuse due to greater access, and the Resourceful Autonomy Hypothesis, which posits that higher-income individuals are better able to regulate their usage. Results indicate that while affluent individuals exhibited higher overuse during the pandemic, this effect diminished by 2022, suggesting a recovery of control. By extending the discussion of digital inequality beyond access and benefits to include overuse, this study expands the landscape of digital inequalities, revealing a new form of stratification in which economic resources shape not only digital advantages but also the ability to mitigate digital risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002523\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wealth, digital overuse, and the changing landscape of digital inequality
Wealth has long influenced digital inequality by shaping access to and benefits from technologies, yet its role in digital overuse—characterized by perceived dissatisfaction and negative consequences rather than mere screen time—remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between income and digital overuse, using data from the 2019–2022 Korean Smartphone Overuse Survey, with 101,625 respondents. Digital overuse is both defined and assessed in terms of self-control failure, behavioral salience, and negative after-effects, analyzed using quantile regression across income percentiles. This study examines whether the unintended consequences of digital engagement, like overuse, are also stratified along socioeconomic lines—just as the benefits of technology have been. To explore this, we test two hypotheses in the context of COVID-19: the Affluence Dependency Hypothesis, which suggests that affluent individuals are more prone to digital overuse due to greater access, and the Resourceful Autonomy Hypothesis, which posits that higher-income individuals are better able to regulate their usage. Results indicate that while affluent individuals exhibited higher overuse during the pandemic, this effect diminished by 2022, suggesting a recovery of control. By extending the discussion of digital inequality beyond access and benefits to include overuse, this study expands the landscape of digital inequalities, revealing a new form of stratification in which economic resources shape not only digital advantages but also the ability to mitigate digital risks.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.