活动环境及其时间性对绿色空间的减压效果有影响吗?基于个人移动传感的证据

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Changda Yu , Mei-Po Kwan , Yang Liu
{"title":"活动环境及其时间性对绿色空间的减压效果有影响吗?基于个人移动传感的证据","authors":"Changda Yu ,&nbsp;Mei-Po Kwan ,&nbsp;Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing discussion on the stress-relieving effects of greenspace tends to overemphasize the dynamics of travel trajectories while overlooking the rich activity contexts and temporality underlying individual behaviors. This oversight may lead to biases and inconsistent findings. Using GPS trajectories of 756 participants in Hong Kong, this study integrates street view data, geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA), and activity-travel diaries to derive individual-level activity contexts. We examine how these contexts moderate the relationship between eye-level greenspace exposure and momentary stress, including temporal dynamics. The results identify three distinct activity contexts with differential impacts on mental stress and the stress-relieving effects of greenspace: (1) Substitutional Activity Contexts (e.g., flexible-schedule activities, solitary or familiar social interactions). These contexts are defined by activities that inherently alleviate stress through intrinsic psychological benefits but diminish the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace, thereby reducing the reliance on greenspace. (2) Stress-Priming Activity Contexts (e.g., rigid-schedule work/study). These involve activities that elevate baseline stress but amplify the stress relieving efficiency of greenspace, creating a “stress-resilient” dynamic. (3) Synergistic Activity Contexts. These unique contexts both reduce stress independently and enhance the efficiency of stress relieving effect of greenspace through combined mechanisms. Active travel (e.g., walking, cycling) embodies this synergy: its intrinsic stress-reducing effect requires long-term exposure (80–160 min), while it enhances the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace after shorter exposure (10–50 min) through sensory-rich engagement with greenery. Policymakers should not only consider the quantity of greenspace in physical environments but also focus on their alignment with people's actual daily activity contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106526"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does activity context and its temporality matter in the stress-relieving effect of greenspace? Evidence based on individual mobile sensing\",\"authors\":\"Changda Yu ,&nbsp;Mei-Po Kwan ,&nbsp;Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Existing discussion on the stress-relieving effects of greenspace tends to overemphasize the dynamics of travel trajectories while overlooking the rich activity contexts and temporality underlying individual behaviors. This oversight may lead to biases and inconsistent findings. Using GPS trajectories of 756 participants in Hong Kong, this study integrates street view data, geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA), and activity-travel diaries to derive individual-level activity contexts. We examine how these contexts moderate the relationship between eye-level greenspace exposure and momentary stress, including temporal dynamics. The results identify three distinct activity contexts with differential impacts on mental stress and the stress-relieving effects of greenspace: (1) Substitutional Activity Contexts (e.g., flexible-schedule activities, solitary or familiar social interactions). These contexts are defined by activities that inherently alleviate stress through intrinsic psychological benefits but diminish the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace, thereby reducing the reliance on greenspace. (2) Stress-Priming Activity Contexts (e.g., rigid-schedule work/study). These involve activities that elevate baseline stress but amplify the stress relieving efficiency of greenspace, creating a “stress-resilient” dynamic. (3) Synergistic Activity Contexts. These unique contexts both reduce stress independently and enhance the efficiency of stress relieving effect of greenspace through combined mechanisms. Active travel (e.g., walking, cycling) embodies this synergy: its intrinsic stress-reducing effect requires long-term exposure (80–160 min), while it enhances the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace after shorter exposure (10–50 min) through sensory-rich engagement with greenery. Policymakers should not only consider the quantity of greenspace in physical environments but also focus on their alignment with people's actual daily activity contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008297\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008297","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的关于绿色空间缓解压力作用的讨论往往过分强调旅行轨迹的动态性,而忽视了个体行为背后丰富的活动背景和时间性。这种疏忽可能导致偏见和不一致的发现。本研究利用香港756名参与者的GPS轨迹,将街景数据、地理生态瞬时评估(GEMA)和活动旅行日记结合起来,得出个人层面的活动背景。我们研究了这些环境如何调节眼平绿色空间暴露与瞬时压力之间的关系,包括时间动态。研究结果确定了三种不同的活动环境,它们对绿色空间的心理压力和压力缓解效果有不同的影响:(1)替代活动环境(如弹性活动、单独或熟悉的社会互动)。这些环境是由活动定义的,这些活动通过内在的心理效益来缓解压力,但降低了绿色空间的减压效率,从而减少了对绿色空间的依赖。(2)压力启动活动情境(例如,严格安排的工作/学习)。这些活动包括提高基线压力,但扩大绿色空间的压力缓解效率,创造一种“压力弹性”动态。(3)协同活动语境。这些独特的环境既可以独立减轻压力,又可以通过组合机制提高绿地的压力缓解效果。主动旅行(如步行、骑自行车)体现了这种协同作用:其内在的减压效果需要长时间暴露(80-160分钟),而通过与绿色植物的丰富感官接触,在较短的暴露(10-50分钟)后,它提高了绿色空间的减压效率。政策制定者不仅要考虑自然环境中绿色空间的数量,还要关注它们与人们实际日常活动环境的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does activity context and its temporality matter in the stress-relieving effect of greenspace? Evidence based on individual mobile sensing
Existing discussion on the stress-relieving effects of greenspace tends to overemphasize the dynamics of travel trajectories while overlooking the rich activity contexts and temporality underlying individual behaviors. This oversight may lead to biases and inconsistent findings. Using GPS trajectories of 756 participants in Hong Kong, this study integrates street view data, geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA), and activity-travel diaries to derive individual-level activity contexts. We examine how these contexts moderate the relationship between eye-level greenspace exposure and momentary stress, including temporal dynamics. The results identify three distinct activity contexts with differential impacts on mental stress and the stress-relieving effects of greenspace: (1) Substitutional Activity Contexts (e.g., flexible-schedule activities, solitary or familiar social interactions). These contexts are defined by activities that inherently alleviate stress through intrinsic psychological benefits but diminish the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace, thereby reducing the reliance on greenspace. (2) Stress-Priming Activity Contexts (e.g., rigid-schedule work/study). These involve activities that elevate baseline stress but amplify the stress relieving efficiency of greenspace, creating a “stress-resilient” dynamic. (3) Synergistic Activity Contexts. These unique contexts both reduce stress independently and enhance the efficiency of stress relieving effect of greenspace through combined mechanisms. Active travel (e.g., walking, cycling) embodies this synergy: its intrinsic stress-reducing effect requires long-term exposure (80–160 min), while it enhances the stress-relieving efficiency of greenspace after shorter exposure (10–50 min) through sensory-rich engagement with greenery. Policymakers should not only consider the quantity of greenspace in physical environments but also focus on their alignment with people's actual daily activity contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信