迈向零排放的城市:对共同利益和权衡评估的现实核查

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
G. Ulpiani , N. Vetters , C. Thiel , P. Florio
{"title":"迈向零排放的城市:对共同利益和权衡评估的现实核查","authors":"G. Ulpiani ,&nbsp;N. Vetters ,&nbsp;C. Thiel ,&nbsp;P. Florio","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban climate change mitigation is an opportunity for cities to achieve a multipurpose agenda if they leverage co-benefits and trade-offs of greenhouse gas reduction. This study examines the approach of 353 cities committed to climate neutrality by 2030 within a common European framework - the Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities Mission - representing diverse geographical, economic, and demographic contexts. The analysis builds on a comprehensive questionnaire and uses a combination of statistical analyses (rankings, answer combinations, classifications) and content analysis. Less than half of the cities (171) assess co-impacts of actions to reduce emissions. Their assessment commonly covers environmental aspects (notably those related to resilience and green space), followed by social aspects, while health-related and economic dimensions receive less attention, on average. Larger cities and those with higher GDP per capita are more likely to conduct comprehensive assessments, indicating disparities in resources and institutional capacity. Almost 90 % of the cities assessing specific social impacts report implementing related measures, concentrating on energy efficiency, transport accessibility, and support for vulnerable populations. However, strategies remain generic and untargeted to specific vulnerabilities. Overall, the analysis reveals a need for integrated policy development, capacity-building, strategic partnerships, effective citizen engagement, robust monitoring setups, and dedicated communication strategies to fully harness the holistic and multifaceted potential of climate action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106835"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cities towards zero emissions: a reality check on the assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs\",\"authors\":\"G. Ulpiani ,&nbsp;N. Vetters ,&nbsp;C. Thiel ,&nbsp;P. Florio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban climate change mitigation is an opportunity for cities to achieve a multipurpose agenda if they leverage co-benefits and trade-offs of greenhouse gas reduction. This study examines the approach of 353 cities committed to climate neutrality by 2030 within a common European framework - the Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities Mission - representing diverse geographical, economic, and demographic contexts. The analysis builds on a comprehensive questionnaire and uses a combination of statistical analyses (rankings, answer combinations, classifications) and content analysis. Less than half of the cities (171) assess co-impacts of actions to reduce emissions. Their assessment commonly covers environmental aspects (notably those related to resilience and green space), followed by social aspects, while health-related and economic dimensions receive less attention, on average. Larger cities and those with higher GDP per capita are more likely to conduct comprehensive assessments, indicating disparities in resources and institutional capacity. Almost 90 % of the cities assessing specific social impacts report implementing related measures, concentrating on energy efficiency, transport accessibility, and support for vulnerable populations. However, strategies remain generic and untargeted to specific vulnerabilities. Overall, the analysis reveals a need for integrated policy development, capacity-building, strategic partnerships, effective citizen engagement, robust monitoring setups, and dedicated communication strategies to fully harness the holistic and multifaceted potential of climate action.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725007085\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725007085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缓解城市气候变化是城市实现多目标议程的一个机会,如果它们利用减少温室气体的共同利益和权衡。本研究考察了353个城市在气候中和和智慧城市使命这一欧洲共同框架下致力于到2030年实现气候中和的做法,这些城市代表了不同的地理、经济和人口背景。该分析以一份全面的问卷为基础,结合了统计分析(排名、答案组合、分类)和内容分析。不到一半的城市(171个)评估了减排行动的共同影响。他们的评估通常包括环境方面(特别是与复原力和绿色空间有关的方面),其次是社会方面,而健康和经济方面平均受到的关注较少。较大的城市和人均国内生产总值较高的城市更有可能进行全面评估,这表明在资源和机构能力方面存在差距。在评估具体社会影响的城市中,近90%的城市报告实施了相关措施,重点关注能源效率、交通可达性和对弱势群体的支持。然而,这些策略仍然是通用的,没有针对特定的漏洞。总体而言,分析表明需要综合政策制定、能力建设、战略伙伴关系、有效的公民参与、健全的监测机制和专门的沟通战略,以充分利用气候行动的整体和多方面潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cities towards zero emissions: a reality check on the assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs
Urban climate change mitigation is an opportunity for cities to achieve a multipurpose agenda if they leverage co-benefits and trade-offs of greenhouse gas reduction. This study examines the approach of 353 cities committed to climate neutrality by 2030 within a common European framework - the Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities Mission - representing diverse geographical, economic, and demographic contexts. The analysis builds on a comprehensive questionnaire and uses a combination of statistical analyses (rankings, answer combinations, classifications) and content analysis. Less than half of the cities (171) assess co-impacts of actions to reduce emissions. Their assessment commonly covers environmental aspects (notably those related to resilience and green space), followed by social aspects, while health-related and economic dimensions receive less attention, on average. Larger cities and those with higher GDP per capita are more likely to conduct comprehensive assessments, indicating disparities in resources and institutional capacity. Almost 90 % of the cities assessing specific social impacts report implementing related measures, concentrating on energy efficiency, transport accessibility, and support for vulnerable populations. However, strategies remain generic and untargeted to specific vulnerabilities. Overall, the analysis reveals a need for integrated policy development, capacity-building, strategic partnerships, effective citizen engagement, robust monitoring setups, and dedicated communication strategies to fully harness the holistic and multifaceted potential of climate action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信