探索和弥合休闲和学校通勤自行车之间的差距

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Maryam Bostanara , Sunhyung Yoo , Lee Roberts , Jinwoo Brian Lee
{"title":"探索和弥合休闲和学校通勤自行车之间的差距","authors":"Maryam Bostanara ,&nbsp;Sunhyung Yoo ,&nbsp;Lee Roberts ,&nbsp;Jinwoo Brian Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the cycling behaviours of high school students, with a particular emphasis on the distinctions between recreational and school commuter cyclists. While much of the existing research has predominantly addressed cycling to school, this study broadens the scope to identify insights that could encourage the transition from recreational cycling to school commuting. We surveyed 325 high-school students in Sydney, Australia, exploring their demographics, cycling attitudes, perceptions of safety, and environmental factors that influence their bicycle use. The data is analysed through two logistic regression models, one for recreational cycling and the other for school commuting, both reinforced by the synthetic minority oversampling technique to address class imbalances. Recreation emerged as the primary motivation for cycling, with students more likely to ride when accompanied by friends or family. There are more recreational cyclists than commuters, likely due to the lack of safe cycling routes, heavy loads during commuting, and insufficient bike parking at schools. The smaller group of commuting cyclists tends to use bicycles more consistently and frequently and exhibit greater risk acceptance towards cycling infrastructure. To encourage cycling to school, we recommend the establishment of dedicated bike lanes to schools completely separated from vehicular traffic and increased bike parking facilities at schools, as well as government subsidies and incentives for cargo racks and e-bike promotion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106513"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring and bridging the gap between recreational and school commute cycling\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Bostanara ,&nbsp;Sunhyung Yoo ,&nbsp;Lee Roberts ,&nbsp;Jinwoo Brian Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the cycling behaviours of high school students, with a particular emphasis on the distinctions between recreational and school commuter cyclists. While much of the existing research has predominantly addressed cycling to school, this study broadens the scope to identify insights that could encourage the transition from recreational cycling to school commuting. We surveyed 325 high-school students in Sydney, Australia, exploring their demographics, cycling attitudes, perceptions of safety, and environmental factors that influence their bicycle use. The data is analysed through two logistic regression models, one for recreational cycling and the other for school commuting, both reinforced by the synthetic minority oversampling technique to address class imbalances. Recreation emerged as the primary motivation for cycling, with students more likely to ride when accompanied by friends or family. There are more recreational cyclists than commuters, likely due to the lack of safe cycling routes, heavy loads during commuting, and insufficient bike parking at schools. The smaller group of commuting cyclists tends to use bicycles more consistently and frequently and exhibit greater risk acceptance towards cycling infrastructure. To encourage cycling to school, we recommend the establishment of dedicated bike lanes to schools completely separated from vehicular traffic and increased bike parking facilities at schools, as well as government subsidies and incentives for cargo racks and e-bike promotion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008169\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125008169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了高中生的骑自行车行为,特别强调了休闲和学校通勤骑自行车者之间的区别。虽然现有的许多研究主要是针对骑自行车上学,但这项研究扩大了范围,以确定可以鼓励从休闲骑自行车到上学通勤的转变的见解。我们调查了澳大利亚悉尼的325名高中生,探讨了他们的人口统计、骑自行车的态度、对安全的看法以及影响他们骑自行车的环境因素。数据通过两个逻辑回归模型进行分析,一个用于休闲骑行,另一个用于学校通勤,两者都通过合成少数过采样技术来加强,以解决班级失衡问题。娱乐成为骑车的主要动机,学生们更有可能在朋友或家人的陪伴下骑车。休闲骑自行车的人比通勤者多,这可能是由于缺乏安全的自行车路线、通勤时的负重以及学校自行车停车位不足。较小的通勤骑自行车者群体倾向于更一致、更频繁地使用自行车,并对自行车基础设施表现出更大的风险接受度。为了鼓励骑自行车上学,我们建议在学校建立与车辆完全分离的专用自行车道,增加学校的自行车停放设施,以及政府补贴和奖励货物架和推广电动自行车。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring and bridging the gap between recreational and school commute cycling
This study explores the cycling behaviours of high school students, with a particular emphasis on the distinctions between recreational and school commuter cyclists. While much of the existing research has predominantly addressed cycling to school, this study broadens the scope to identify insights that could encourage the transition from recreational cycling to school commuting. We surveyed 325 high-school students in Sydney, Australia, exploring their demographics, cycling attitudes, perceptions of safety, and environmental factors that influence their bicycle use. The data is analysed through two logistic regression models, one for recreational cycling and the other for school commuting, both reinforced by the synthetic minority oversampling technique to address class imbalances. Recreation emerged as the primary motivation for cycling, with students more likely to ride when accompanied by friends or family. There are more recreational cyclists than commuters, likely due to the lack of safe cycling routes, heavy loads during commuting, and insufficient bike parking at schools. The smaller group of commuting cyclists tends to use bicycles more consistently and frequently and exhibit greater risk acceptance towards cycling infrastructure. To encourage cycling to school, we recommend the establishment of dedicated bike lanes to schools completely separated from vehicular traffic and increased bike parking facilities at schools, as well as government subsidies and incentives for cargo racks and e-bike promotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信