Saroja Selvanathan , Maneka Jayasinghe , Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan
{"title":"在没有价格数据的情况下估计收入边际效用的收入弹性的新方法","authors":"Saroja Selvanathan , Maneka Jayasinghe , Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The income elasticity of marginal utility of income, <em>ω</em>, and price elasticities are key parameters in both micro- and macroeconomic policy analyses, including computable general equilibrium modeling, cost-benefit analysis, and public economics decision-making. Typically, the value of <em>ω</em> is derived by estimating demand systems using price, quantity, and income data. Price elasticities are then calculated based on the estimated value of <em>ω</em>. However, most household expenditure surveys do not separately collect price data, making it impossible to estimate <em>ω</em> and price elasticities directly. This limitation creates significant challenges when using household survey data for consumer demand analysis. A recent study by Clements et al. (2022) used Australian household expenditure survey data to estimate price elasticities in the absence of price data by adopting an approximate value, <em>ω</em> = −2, which is frequently cited in the consumer demand literature when price data are available. Building upon this, the present paper introduces a new method for estimating <em>ω</em> and, in turn, price elasticities and demonstrate its application using Sri Lanka's Household Income and Expenditure Survey data. The estimated <em>ω</em> values are then used to test the well-known Frisch (1959) conjecture and Pigou's (1910) law. Both are strongly supported by the data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107330"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new method to estimate the income elasticity of marginal utility of income in the absence of price data\",\"authors\":\"Saroja Selvanathan , Maneka Jayasinghe , Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The income elasticity of marginal utility of income, <em>ω</em>, and price elasticities are key parameters in both micro- and macroeconomic policy analyses, including computable general equilibrium modeling, cost-benefit analysis, and public economics decision-making. Typically, the value of <em>ω</em> is derived by estimating demand systems using price, quantity, and income data. Price elasticities are then calculated based on the estimated value of <em>ω</em>. However, most household expenditure surveys do not separately collect price data, making it impossible to estimate <em>ω</em> and price elasticities directly. This limitation creates significant challenges when using household survey data for consumer demand analysis. A recent study by Clements et al. (2022) used Australian household expenditure survey data to estimate price elasticities in the absence of price data by adopting an approximate value, <em>ω</em> = −2, which is frequently cited in the consumer demand literature when price data are available. Building upon this, the present paper introduces a new method for estimating <em>ω</em> and, in turn, price elasticities and demonstrate its application using Sri Lanka's Household Income and Expenditure Survey data. The estimated <em>ω</em> values are then used to test the well-known Frisch (1959) conjecture and Pigou's (1910) law. Both are strongly supported by the data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325003256\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325003256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A new method to estimate the income elasticity of marginal utility of income in the absence of price data
The income elasticity of marginal utility of income, ω, and price elasticities are key parameters in both micro- and macroeconomic policy analyses, including computable general equilibrium modeling, cost-benefit analysis, and public economics decision-making. Typically, the value of ω is derived by estimating demand systems using price, quantity, and income data. Price elasticities are then calculated based on the estimated value of ω. However, most household expenditure surveys do not separately collect price data, making it impossible to estimate ω and price elasticities directly. This limitation creates significant challenges when using household survey data for consumer demand analysis. A recent study by Clements et al. (2022) used Australian household expenditure survey data to estimate price elasticities in the absence of price data by adopting an approximate value, ω = −2, which is frequently cited in the consumer demand literature when price data are available. Building upon this, the present paper introduces a new method for estimating ω and, in turn, price elasticities and demonstrate its application using Sri Lanka's Household Income and Expenditure Survey data. The estimated ω values are then used to test the well-known Frisch (1959) conjecture and Pigou's (1910) law. Both are strongly supported by the data.
期刊介绍:
Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.