肩部外展时肌肉控制的随机模型

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Alex Bersani , Saulo Martelli , Maxence Lavaill , Giorgio Davico
{"title":"肩部外展时肌肉控制的随机模型","authors":"Alex Bersani ,&nbsp;Saulo Martelli ,&nbsp;Maxence Lavaill ,&nbsp;Giorgio Davico","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intrinsic variability of the shoulder joint motion is a critical factor in the characterisation of the shoulder joint. However, traditional computational approaches struggle to account for it. On the other hand, the stochastic approach allows to identify a set of plausible solutions. In this study, the Myobolica toolbox, which yielded promising results in the lower limb, was employed to simulate a shoulder abduction, with twofold aims: to assess its generalisability to other joints, and to evaluate an electromyography (EMG)-informed version of Myobolica.</div><div>Publicly available kinematics, EMG, and glenohumeral (GH) joint force data measured by an instrumented implant on a 64-year-old man executing three weighted shoulder abductions were used. A previously developed shoulder musculoskeletal model was employed to compute stochastic simulations informed and not with EMG data, sampling 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> solutions every 30 timeframes. The predicted GH joint force were compared to the experimental data, and the variance in the solutions across simulations was computed.</div><div>Overall, the correlation between the GH joint force predicted by Myobolica and the experimental values increased when the EMG-based constraint was applied (from approximately R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW when all available EMG data were employed). Using EMG led to a reduction (from 2.3 to 0.65 BW) in the solution bandwidths.</div><div>Providing EMG data to inform the simulations helped improve their accuracy. However, the results obtained otherwise remain promising. Additional work is required to minimize the computational cost of the Myobolica approach. A consistency gap between experimental data and the model is reported.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic modelling of muscle control during shoulder abduction\",\"authors\":\"Alex Bersani ,&nbsp;Saulo Martelli ,&nbsp;Maxence Lavaill ,&nbsp;Giorgio Davico\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The intrinsic variability of the shoulder joint motion is a critical factor in the characterisation of the shoulder joint. However, traditional computational approaches struggle to account for it. On the other hand, the stochastic approach allows to identify a set of plausible solutions. In this study, the Myobolica toolbox, which yielded promising results in the lower limb, was employed to simulate a shoulder abduction, with twofold aims: to assess its generalisability to other joints, and to evaluate an electromyography (EMG)-informed version of Myobolica.</div><div>Publicly available kinematics, EMG, and glenohumeral (GH) joint force data measured by an instrumented implant on a 64-year-old man executing three weighted shoulder abductions were used. A previously developed shoulder musculoskeletal model was employed to compute stochastic simulations informed and not with EMG data, sampling 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> solutions every 30 timeframes. The predicted GH joint force were compared to the experimental data, and the variance in the solutions across simulations was computed.</div><div>Overall, the correlation between the GH joint force predicted by Myobolica and the experimental values increased when the EMG-based constraint was applied (from approximately R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW when all available EMG data were employed). Using EMG led to a reduction (from 2.3 to 0.65 BW) in the solution bandwidths.</div><div>Providing EMG data to inform the simulations helped improve their accuracy. However, the results obtained otherwise remain promising. Additional work is required to minimize the computational cost of the Myobolica approach. A consistency gap between experimental data and the model is reported.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025005056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025005056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩关节运动的内在可变性是肩关节表征的关键因素。然而,传统的计算方法很难解释它。另一方面,随机方法允许识别一组合理的解决方案。在这项研究中,Myobolica工具箱在下肢取得了令人满意的结果,被用来模拟肩部外展,有两个目的:评估其在其他关节的普遍性,并评估Myobolica的肌电图(EMG)信息版本。公开的运动学、肌电图和肩关节(GH)关节力数据是通过一名64岁男性进行三次加权肩外展的器械植入物测量的。采用先前开发的肩部肌肉骨骼模型来计算随机模拟,并告知肌电图数据,每30个时间框架采样1 × 105个解决方案。将预测结果与实验结果进行了比较,并计算了模拟结果的方差。总的来说,当应用基于肌电图的约束时,Myobolica预测的GH关节力与实验值之间的相关性增加(从大约R2 = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW到R2 = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW,当使用所有可用的肌电图数据时)。使用肌电图可以降低溶液带宽(从2.3 BW降至0.65 BW)。为模拟提供肌电图数据有助于提高模拟的准确性。然而,在其他方面获得的结果仍然很有希望。需要额外的工作来最小化Myobolica方法的计算成本。报告了实验数据与模型之间的一致性差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stochastic modelling of muscle control during shoulder abduction
The intrinsic variability of the shoulder joint motion is a critical factor in the characterisation of the shoulder joint. However, traditional computational approaches struggle to account for it. On the other hand, the stochastic approach allows to identify a set of plausible solutions. In this study, the Myobolica toolbox, which yielded promising results in the lower limb, was employed to simulate a shoulder abduction, with twofold aims: to assess its generalisability to other joints, and to evaluate an electromyography (EMG)-informed version of Myobolica.
Publicly available kinematics, EMG, and glenohumeral (GH) joint force data measured by an instrumented implant on a 64-year-old man executing three weighted shoulder abductions were used. A previously developed shoulder musculoskeletal model was employed to compute stochastic simulations informed and not with EMG data, sampling 1 × 105 solutions every 30 timeframes. The predicted GH joint force were compared to the experimental data, and the variance in the solutions across simulations was computed.
Overall, the correlation between the GH joint force predicted by Myobolica and the experimental values increased when the EMG-based constraint was applied (from approximately R2 = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW to R2 = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW when all available EMG data were employed). Using EMG led to a reduction (from 2.3 to 0.65 BW) in the solution bandwidths.
Providing EMG data to inform the simulations helped improve their accuracy. However, the results obtained otherwise remain promising. Additional work is required to minimize the computational cost of the Myobolica approach. A consistency gap between experimental data and the model is reported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信