只是说对不起——道歉对社会排斥后重新融入社会的影响

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Alexandra Baier , Tarek Jaber-Lopez
{"title":"只是说对不起——道歉对社会排斥后重新融入社会的影响","authors":"Alexandra Baier ,&nbsp;Tarek Jaber-Lopez","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Apologies are ubiquitous in life and across cultures and countries, and they are able to impact social relationships as well as material outcomes. One specific application refers to restorative justice and mediation programs. While empirical data is biased by unobservable influences, a controlled experiment provides additional evidence on the effect of apologies after exclusion. We present an experiment in which participants can steal from other group members and can be excluded for one period. We compare four treatments in which we give the option to apologize (or not) and where apologies can be tracked (or not). We find that apologizing significantly reduces theft and participants who apologize experience more re-integrative behavior from the rest of the group members than those who do not apologize. Additionally, we find that people do apologize even when their apologies cannot be tracked, suggesting that apologies are not purely used as a strategic device.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 107246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just saying sorry—The effect of apologies on reintegration after social exclusion\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Baier ,&nbsp;Tarek Jaber-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Apologies are ubiquitous in life and across cultures and countries, and they are able to impact social relationships as well as material outcomes. One specific application refers to restorative justice and mediation programs. While empirical data is biased by unobservable influences, a controlled experiment provides additional evidence on the effect of apologies after exclusion. We present an experiment in which participants can steal from other group members and can be excluded for one period. We compare four treatments in which we give the option to apologize (or not) and where apologies can be tracked (or not). We find that apologizing significantly reduces theft and participants who apologize experience more re-integrative behavior from the rest of the group members than those who do not apologize. Additionally, we find that people do apologize even when their apologies cannot be tracked, suggesting that apologies are not purely used as a strategic device.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125003658\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125003658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道歉在生活、文化和国家中无处不在,它们能够影响社会关系和物质成果。一个具体的应用是恢复性司法和调解项目。虽然经验数据因不可观察的影响而有偏差,但一项对照实验为排除后道歉的效果提供了额外的证据。我们提出了一个实验,在这个实验中,参与者可以从其他小组成员那里偷东西,并且可以被排除一段时间。我们比较了四种治疗方法,在这四种治疗方法中,我们可以选择道歉(或不道歉),以及道歉可以被跟踪(或不被跟踪)。我们发现道歉显著地减少了偷窃行为,道歉的参与者比不道歉的参与者从其他小组成员那里体验到更多的重新融入行为。此外,我们发现,即使人们的道歉无法被追踪,他们也会道歉,这表明道歉并不纯粹是一种策略手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Just saying sorry—The effect of apologies on reintegration after social exclusion
Apologies are ubiquitous in life and across cultures and countries, and they are able to impact social relationships as well as material outcomes. One specific application refers to restorative justice and mediation programs. While empirical data is biased by unobservable influences, a controlled experiment provides additional evidence on the effect of apologies after exclusion. We present an experiment in which participants can steal from other group members and can be excluded for one period. We compare four treatments in which we give the option to apologize (or not) and where apologies can be tracked (or not). We find that apologizing significantly reduces theft and participants who apologize experience more re-integrative behavior from the rest of the group members than those who do not apologize. Additionally, we find that people do apologize even when their apologies cannot be tracked, suggesting that apologies are not purely used as a strategic device.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信