弥合国际海洋保护区管理有效性指标和政策影响本土化的差距

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Huey-Shian Chung , Yu-Lun Zheng
{"title":"弥合国际海洋保护区管理有效性指标和政策影响本土化的差距","authors":"Huey-Shian Chung ,&nbsp;Yu-Lun Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a global priority for biodiversity conservation, with rapid expansion increasing the need for effective management assessment mechanisms. While international assessment toolboxes exist, they are often criticized for being complex or misaligned with local conditions, prompting a need for context-specific approaches. However, there has been little focus on identifying and addressing the challenges of localizing these international tools. This study addresses this gap by presenting an importance-applicability analysis of the frequently used management effectiveness indicators based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) framework, applied to a benchmark, the Wanghaixiang Chaojing Bay Resource Conservation Area in Taiwan. Through a literature review and semistructured interviews, the study examines the practical challenges of implementing the indicators. Findings indicate a clear gap between the perceived importance of the indicators and their local applicability, highlighting hidden challenges related to data availability, expertise, local context, and governance structures across biophysical, socioeconomic, and governance indicators. The strategies to bridge this gap are including accounting for indicator interconnectedness, designing long-term evaluation plans, and incorporating the perspectives of onsite managers, whose daily operational knowledge is vital but often overlooked. The findings contribute to removing obstacles in worldwide marine conservation by improving the cost-effectiveness and consistency of MPA governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 107952"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the gap of localizing international MPA management effectiveness indicators and policy implications\",\"authors\":\"Huey-Shian Chung ,&nbsp;Yu-Lun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a global priority for biodiversity conservation, with rapid expansion increasing the need for effective management assessment mechanisms. While international assessment toolboxes exist, they are often criticized for being complex or misaligned with local conditions, prompting a need for context-specific approaches. However, there has been little focus on identifying and addressing the challenges of localizing these international tools. This study addresses this gap by presenting an importance-applicability analysis of the frequently used management effectiveness indicators based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) framework, applied to a benchmark, the Wanghaixiang Chaojing Bay Resource Conservation Area in Taiwan. Through a literature review and semistructured interviews, the study examines the practical challenges of implementing the indicators. Findings indicate a clear gap between the perceived importance of the indicators and their local applicability, highlighting hidden challenges related to data availability, expertise, local context, and governance structures across biophysical, socioeconomic, and governance indicators. The strategies to bridge this gap are including accounting for indicator interconnectedness, designing long-term evaluation plans, and incorporating the perspectives of onsite managers, whose daily operational knowledge is vital but often overlooked. The findings contribute to removing obstacles in worldwide marine conservation by improving the cost-effectiveness and consistency of MPA governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107952\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125004156\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125004156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋保护区(MPAs)是全球生物多样性保护的重点领域,其迅速扩大增加了对有效管理评估机制的需求。虽然存在国际评估工具箱,但它们经常因复杂或与当地条件不一致而受到批评,这促使人们需要针对具体情况的方法。然而,很少有人关注识别和解决这些国际工具本地化的挑战。本研究基于国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)框架,对常用的管理有效性指标进行重要性适用性分析,并以台湾望海乡巢景湾资源保护区为基准,解决了这一差距。通过文献综述和半结构化访谈,本研究考察了实施指标的实际挑战。研究结果表明,指标的感知重要性与其在当地的适用性之间存在明显差距,突出了与生物物理、社会经济和治理指标的数据可用性、专业知识、当地情况和治理结构相关的潜在挑战。弥补这一差距的策略包括考虑指标的相互关联性,设计长期评估计划,并纳入现场管理人员的观点,他们的日常运营知识至关重要,但往往被忽视。研究结果有助于通过提高海洋保护区管理的成本效益和一致性来消除全球海洋保护的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the gap of localizing international MPA management effectiveness indicators and policy implications
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a global priority for biodiversity conservation, with rapid expansion increasing the need for effective management assessment mechanisms. While international assessment toolboxes exist, they are often criticized for being complex or misaligned with local conditions, prompting a need for context-specific approaches. However, there has been little focus on identifying and addressing the challenges of localizing these international tools. This study addresses this gap by presenting an importance-applicability analysis of the frequently used management effectiveness indicators based on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) framework, applied to a benchmark, the Wanghaixiang Chaojing Bay Resource Conservation Area in Taiwan. Through a literature review and semistructured interviews, the study examines the practical challenges of implementing the indicators. Findings indicate a clear gap between the perceived importance of the indicators and their local applicability, highlighting hidden challenges related to data availability, expertise, local context, and governance structures across biophysical, socioeconomic, and governance indicators. The strategies to bridge this gap are including accounting for indicator interconnectedness, designing long-term evaluation plans, and incorporating the perspectives of onsite managers, whose daily operational knowledge is vital but often overlooked. The findings contribute to removing obstacles in worldwide marine conservation by improving the cost-effectiveness and consistency of MPA governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信