{"title":"广义全称推理中的多重检验","authors":"Neil Dey, Ryan Martin, Jonathan P. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2025.110559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. Applications often require consideration of multiple hypotheses simultaneously, and tools for handling such cases using e-values can be found in the relevant literature. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This short paper demonstrates that, depending on the multiple testing context, the generalized universal inference framework is well-suited for use with the existing e-value merging and adjustment strategies to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for certain distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the strong performance of this general approach in a simulation study involving significance testing in quantile regression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49475,"journal":{"name":"Statistics & Probability Letters","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 110559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple testing in generalized universal inference\",\"authors\":\"Neil Dey, Ryan Martin, Jonathan P. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spl.2025.110559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. Applications often require consideration of multiple hypotheses simultaneously, and tools for handling such cases using e-values can be found in the relevant literature. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This short paper demonstrates that, depending on the multiple testing context, the generalized universal inference framework is well-suited for use with the existing e-value merging and adjustment strategies to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for certain distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the strong performance of this general approach in a simulation study involving significance testing in quantile regression.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics & Probability Letters\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics & Probability Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715225002044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics & Probability Letters","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715225002044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiple testing in generalized universal inference
Compared to p-values, e-values provably guarantee safe, valid inference. Applications often require consideration of multiple hypotheses simultaneously, and tools for handling such cases using e-values can be found in the relevant literature. Standard e-value constructions, however, require distributional assumptions that may not be justifiable. This short paper demonstrates that, depending on the multiple testing context, the generalized universal inference framework is well-suited for use with the existing e-value merging and adjustment strategies to control frequentist error rates in multiple testing when the quantities of interest are minimizers of risk functions, thereby avoiding the need for certain distributional assumptions. We demonstrate the strong performance of this general approach in a simulation study involving significance testing in quantile regression.
期刊介绍:
Statistics & Probability Letters adopts a novel and highly innovative approach to the publication of research findings in statistics and probability. It features concise articles, rapid publication and broad coverage of the statistics and probability literature.
Statistics & Probability Letters is a refereed journal. Articles will be limited to six journal pages (13 double-space typed pages) including references and figures. Apart from the six-page limitation, originality, quality and clarity will be the criteria for choosing the material to be published in Statistics & Probability Letters. Every attempt will be made to provide the first review of a submitted manuscript within three months of submission.
The proliferation of literature and long publication delays have made it difficult for researchers and practitioners to keep up with new developments outside of, or even within, their specialization. The aim of Statistics & Probability Letters is to help to alleviate this problem. Concise communications (letters) allow readers to quickly and easily digest large amounts of material and to stay up-to-date with developments in all areas of statistics and probability.
The mainstream of Letters will focus on new statistical methods, theoretical results, and innovative applications of statistics and probability to other scientific disciplines. Key results and central ideas must be presented in a clear and concise manner. These results may be part of a larger study that the author will submit at a later time as a full length paper to SPL or to another journal. Theory and methodology may be published with proofs omitted, or only sketched, but only if sufficient support material is provided so that the findings can be verified. Empirical and computational results that are of significant value will be published.