风力发电机叶片可持续生命周期管理中循环度指标的范围和适用性的关键评估

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Marta Diez-Viera , Eva Sevigné-Itoiz , Joan Manuel F. Mendoza
{"title":"风力发电机叶片可持续生命周期管理中循环度指标的范围和适用性的关键评估","authors":"Marta Diez-Viera ,&nbsp;Eva Sevigné-Itoiz ,&nbsp;Joan Manuel F. Mendoza","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decommissioning of wind turbines is expected to generate large volumes of composite wind turbine blade (WTB) waste that should be handled properly to avoid negative effects on the environment. Despite the growing interest in sustainable life cycle management (LCM) strategies applicable to WTBs, circularity indicators are still rarely used to support decision-making processes. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the scope and practical applicability of circularity indicators across WTB-LCM pathways, stages, and processes. A systematic literature review was conducted covering 158 peer-reviewed papers and identifying 120 circularity indicators, which were subsequently screened using three complementary matrices (extended RACER, circular composite design, and wind sector-specific criteria). This process led to the selection of 13 indicators considered most relevant to the wind industry. Although no single indicator comprehensively captures circularity across all stages and dimensions, the Materials Efficiency Metric was identified as the most suitable for the beginning and middle stages of the life cycle, while the Carbon Footprint Formula was considered most appropriate for the end-of-life stage. Nonetheless, both exhibit relevant limitations for decision-support in practice, as none of the selected indicators fully captures composite-specific quality parameters, such as fibre degradation, resin compatibility, or the potential for reintegration into high-value applications. Building on these findings, the study identifies three main directions for future research: (i) the development of circularity indicators that incorporate underlooked life cycle stages, such as installation, operation and maintenance; (ii) the integration of material quality parameters, such as fibre integrity and resin compatibility, into the design of new indicators; and (iii) the analysis of empirical case studies to determine the maximum circularity performance that could be achieved across the LCM of WTB, in order to support the development of circular innovations. These areas are essential for advancing more comprehensive, system-level assessments and supporting effective strategies for the sustainable energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 123-140"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical assessment of the scope and applicability of circularity indicators for the sustainable life cycle management of wind turbine blades\",\"authors\":\"Marta Diez-Viera ,&nbsp;Eva Sevigné-Itoiz ,&nbsp;Joan Manuel F. Mendoza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The decommissioning of wind turbines is expected to generate large volumes of composite wind turbine blade (WTB) waste that should be handled properly to avoid negative effects on the environment. Despite the growing interest in sustainable life cycle management (LCM) strategies applicable to WTBs, circularity indicators are still rarely used to support decision-making processes. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the scope and practical applicability of circularity indicators across WTB-LCM pathways, stages, and processes. A systematic literature review was conducted covering 158 peer-reviewed papers and identifying 120 circularity indicators, which were subsequently screened using three complementary matrices (extended RACER, circular composite design, and wind sector-specific criteria). This process led to the selection of 13 indicators considered most relevant to the wind industry. Although no single indicator comprehensively captures circularity across all stages and dimensions, the Materials Efficiency Metric was identified as the most suitable for the beginning and middle stages of the life cycle, while the Carbon Footprint Formula was considered most appropriate for the end-of-life stage. Nonetheless, both exhibit relevant limitations for decision-support in practice, as none of the selected indicators fully captures composite-specific quality parameters, such as fibre degradation, resin compatibility, or the potential for reintegration into high-value applications. Building on these findings, the study identifies three main directions for future research: (i) the development of circularity indicators that incorporate underlooked life cycle stages, such as installation, operation and maintenance; (ii) the integration of material quality parameters, such as fibre integrity and resin compatibility, into the design of new indicators; and (iii) the analysis of empirical case studies to determine the maximum circularity performance that could be achieved across the LCM of WTB, in order to support the development of circular innovations. These areas are essential for advancing more comprehensive, system-level assessments and supporting effective strategies for the sustainable energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 123-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001873\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001873","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风力涡轮机的退役预计会产生大量的复合风力涡轮机叶片(WTB)废物,应妥善处理,以避免对环境产生负面影响。尽管人们对适用于wtb的可持续生命周期管理(LCM)战略越来越感兴趣,但循环指标仍然很少用于支持决策过程。本研究通过评估循环指标在WTB-LCM途径、阶段和过程中的范围和实际适用性来解决这一差距。对158篇同行评议论文进行了系统的文献综述,并确定了120个循环指标,随后使用三个互补矩阵(扩展RACER、循环复合设计和风电行业特定标准)进行筛选。这一过程选出了13个被认为与风电行业最相关的指标。虽然没有一个单一的指标能全面反映所有阶段和维度的循环度,但材料效率指标被认为是最适合生命周期的开始和中期阶段的,而碳足迹公式被认为是最适合生命周期的结束阶段的。然而,在实践中,这两种指标在决策支持方面都表现出相关的局限性,因为所选指标中没有一种能够完全捕获复合材料特定的质量参数,例如纤维降解、树脂相容性或重新融入高价值应用的潜力。在这些发现的基础上,研究确定了未来研究的三个主要方向:(i)发展循环指标,包括未被忽视的生命周期阶段,如安装、操作和维护;(ii)将纤维完整性和树脂相容性等材料质量参数纳入新指标的设计;(iii)实证案例分析,以确定在WTB的LCM中可以实现的最大循环性能,以支持循环创新的发展。这些领域对于推进更全面的系统级评估和支持可持续能源转型的有效战略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical assessment of the scope and applicability of circularity indicators for the sustainable life cycle management of wind turbine blades
The decommissioning of wind turbines is expected to generate large volumes of composite wind turbine blade (WTB) waste that should be handled properly to avoid negative effects on the environment. Despite the growing interest in sustainable life cycle management (LCM) strategies applicable to WTBs, circularity indicators are still rarely used to support decision-making processes. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the scope and practical applicability of circularity indicators across WTB-LCM pathways, stages, and processes. A systematic literature review was conducted covering 158 peer-reviewed papers and identifying 120 circularity indicators, which were subsequently screened using three complementary matrices (extended RACER, circular composite design, and wind sector-specific criteria). This process led to the selection of 13 indicators considered most relevant to the wind industry. Although no single indicator comprehensively captures circularity across all stages and dimensions, the Materials Efficiency Metric was identified as the most suitable for the beginning and middle stages of the life cycle, while the Carbon Footprint Formula was considered most appropriate for the end-of-life stage. Nonetheless, both exhibit relevant limitations for decision-support in practice, as none of the selected indicators fully captures composite-specific quality parameters, such as fibre degradation, resin compatibility, or the potential for reintegration into high-value applications. Building on these findings, the study identifies three main directions for future research: (i) the development of circularity indicators that incorporate underlooked life cycle stages, such as installation, operation and maintenance; (ii) the integration of material quality parameters, such as fibre integrity and resin compatibility, into the design of new indicators; and (iii) the analysis of empirical case studies to determine the maximum circularity performance that could be achieved across the LCM of WTB, in order to support the development of circular innovations. These areas are essential for advancing more comprehensive, system-level assessments and supporting effective strategies for the sustainable energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信