Ivan Filipe Fernandes , Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes , Michael Touchton , Brian Libgober
{"title":"超越党派言论:巴西的制度限制和地方COVID-19政策","authors":"Ivan Filipe Fernandes , Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes , Michael Touchton , Brian Libgober","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Political polarization can influence policy responses, particularly during crises. While institutions aim to counterbalance these effects, their capacity to do so under stress remains underexplored. This study examines whether mayoral partisan ideology affected pandemic policymaking in Brazilian municipalities, a highly polarized context with a severe COVID-19 health burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a regression discontinuity design in 599 closely contested mayoral elections in 2016 to identify causal effects of partisan ideology on municipal pandemic responses in 2020. The analysis focused on formal policy measures and behavioral outcomes, particularly compliance with social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mayoral partisan ideology had minimal influence on formal pandemic policymaking at the municipal level, challenging assumptions based on national partisan cues. However, municipalities led by right-wing mayors showed lower compliance with social isolation in the short term, despite no significant differences in formal policies and overall compliance across the first year of the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the complexity of partisan influence on health policymaking during crises. While national politics may shape public discourse, institutional structures and political and electoral interests can mitigate ideological effects on local policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118607"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond partisan rhetoric: Institutional constraints and local COVID-19 policies in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Filipe Fernandes , Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes , Michael Touchton , Brian Libgober\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Political polarization can influence policy responses, particularly during crises. While institutions aim to counterbalance these effects, their capacity to do so under stress remains underexplored. This study examines whether mayoral partisan ideology affected pandemic policymaking in Brazilian municipalities, a highly polarized context with a severe COVID-19 health burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a regression discontinuity design in 599 closely contested mayoral elections in 2016 to identify causal effects of partisan ideology on municipal pandemic responses in 2020. The analysis focused on formal policy measures and behavioral outcomes, particularly compliance with social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mayoral partisan ideology had minimal influence on formal pandemic policymaking at the municipal level, challenging assumptions based on national partisan cues. However, municipalities led by right-wing mayors showed lower compliance with social isolation in the short term, despite no significant differences in formal policies and overall compliance across the first year of the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the complexity of partisan influence on health policymaking during crises. While national politics may shape public discourse, institutional structures and political and electoral interests can mitigate ideological effects on local policymaking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009384\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond partisan rhetoric: Institutional constraints and local COVID-19 policies in Brazil
Background
Political polarization can influence policy responses, particularly during crises. While institutions aim to counterbalance these effects, their capacity to do so under stress remains underexplored. This study examines whether mayoral partisan ideology affected pandemic policymaking in Brazilian municipalities, a highly polarized context with a severe COVID-19 health burden.
Methods
We used a regression discontinuity design in 599 closely contested mayoral elections in 2016 to identify causal effects of partisan ideology on municipal pandemic responses in 2020. The analysis focused on formal policy measures and behavioral outcomes, particularly compliance with social isolation.
Results
Mayoral partisan ideology had minimal influence on formal pandemic policymaking at the municipal level, challenging assumptions based on national partisan cues. However, municipalities led by right-wing mayors showed lower compliance with social isolation in the short term, despite no significant differences in formal policies and overall compliance across the first year of the pandemic.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the complexity of partisan influence on health policymaking during crises. While national politics may shape public discourse, institutional structures and political and electoral interests can mitigate ideological effects on local policymaking.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.