宫颈癌液体活检生物标志物:系统综述和荟萃分析

Isaac Kinyua Njangiru , Bizhar Ahmed Tayeb , Hazhmat Ali , Rafl M. Kamil
{"title":"宫颈癌液体活检生物标志物:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Isaac Kinyua Njangiru ,&nbsp;Bizhar Ahmed Tayeb ,&nbsp;Hazhmat Ali ,&nbsp;Rafl M. Kamil","doi":"10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Liquid biopsy biomarkers are emerging as vital tools for cancer screening and diagnosis, offering a noninvasive and accurate approach to early malignancy detection. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating biomarkers in cervical cancer (CC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, identifying 130 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Data on true and false positives and negatives were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool, while publication bias was assessed via Deeks’ funnel plot.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included 1301 patients, 670 healthy controls, and 438 individuals with benign or precancerous lesions. Pooled sensitivity was 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.65–0.70), and specificity was 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.81–0.86). The DOR was 61.10 (95 % CI: 32.20–115.9), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. Most studies demonstrated a low risk of bias, and no significant publication bias was observed (P = 0.06). Plasma-based liquid biopsies and miRNA biomarkers exhibited superior diagnostic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that liquid biopsy biomarkers may substantially enhance the accuracy of cervical cancer detection, representing a promising strategy for early diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquid biopsy biomarkers in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Kinyua Njangiru ,&nbsp;Bizhar Ahmed Tayeb ,&nbsp;Hazhmat Ali ,&nbsp;Rafl M. Kamil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Liquid biopsy biomarkers are emerging as vital tools for cancer screening and diagnosis, offering a noninvasive and accurate approach to early malignancy detection. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating biomarkers in cervical cancer (CC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, identifying 130 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Data on true and false positives and negatives were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool, while publication bias was assessed via Deeks’ funnel plot.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included 1301 patients, 670 healthy controls, and 438 individuals with benign or precancerous lesions. Pooled sensitivity was 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.65–0.70), and specificity was 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.81–0.86). The DOR was 61.10 (95 % CI: 32.20–115.9), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. Most studies demonstrated a low risk of bias, and no significant publication bias was observed (P = 0.06). Plasma-based liquid biopsies and miRNA biomarkers exhibited superior diagnostic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that liquid biopsy biomarkers may substantially enhance the accuracy of cervical cancer detection, representing a promising strategy for early diagnosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019542500044X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Liquid Biopsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019542500044X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的液体活检生物标志物正在成为癌症筛查和诊断的重要工具,为早期恶性肿瘤检测提供了一种非侵入性和准确的方法。本研究旨在评估循环生物标志物在宫颈癌(CC)中的诊断性能。方法在Cochrane Library、PubMed、SCOPUS和Web of Science中进行综合文献检索,共检索到130篇研究,其中11篇符合纳入标准。提取真阳性、假阳性和阴性数据,计算合并敏感性、特异性、似然比、诊断优势比(DORs)和95%置信区间(ci)。使用QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量和偏倚风险,通过Deeks漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果荟萃分析包括1301例患者、670例健康对照和438例良性或癌前病变患者。合并敏感性为0.68 (95% CI: 0.65 ~ 0.70),特异性为0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 ~ 0.86)。DOR为61.10 (95% CI: 32.20 ~ 115.9),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.95。大多数研究显示偏倚风险较低,未观察到显著的发表偏倚(P = 0.06)。血浆液体活检和miRNA生物标志物表现出优越的诊断性能。结论液体活检生物标志物可显著提高宫颈癌检测的准确性,是一种有前景的早期诊断策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Liquid biopsy biomarkers in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Liquid biopsy biomarkers in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/objectives

Liquid biopsy biomarkers are emerging as vital tools for cancer screening and diagnosis, offering a noninvasive and accurate approach to early malignancy detection. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating biomarkers in cervical cancer (CC).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, identifying 130 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Data on true and false positives and negatives were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool, while publication bias was assessed via Deeks’ funnel plot.

Results

The meta-analysis included 1301 patients, 670 healthy controls, and 438 individuals with benign or precancerous lesions. Pooled sensitivity was 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.65–0.70), and specificity was 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.81–0.86). The DOR was 61.10 (95 % CI: 32.20–115.9), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95. Most studies demonstrated a low risk of bias, and no significant publication bias was observed (P = 0.06). Plasma-based liquid biopsies and miRNA biomarkers exhibited superior diagnostic performance.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that liquid biopsy biomarkers may substantially enhance the accuracy of cervical cancer detection, representing a promising strategy for early diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信