培养专业视野:数学教师候选人在讨论课堂模型视频时的知识谈判

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Håvard J. Evang
{"title":"培养专业视野:数学教师候选人在讨论课堂模型视频时的知识谈判","authors":"Håvard J. Evang","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2025.105160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers' professional vision is a key component of teachers' professional competence. This study examines how teacher candidates’ intersubjective framing processes when discussing video-recorded classroom talk support their professional vision development. Inspired by a conversation-analysis approach to learning, the study analyzes video-anchored discussions among 20 candidates at a Norwegian university and identifies two normative patterns: one privileging professional knowledge in general didactical discussions, and another privileging personalized knowledge and accepting vague arguments in mathematics-specific discussions. The study highlights the need to foster explicit and evidence-based reasoning in teacher education to enhance professional vision development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 105160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing professional vision: Mathematics teacher candidates’ negotiation of knowledge when discussing model videos from classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Håvard J. Evang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tate.2025.105160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Teachers' professional vision is a key component of teachers' professional competence. This study examines how teacher candidates’ intersubjective framing processes when discussing video-recorded classroom talk support their professional vision development. Inspired by a conversation-analysis approach to learning, the study analyzes video-anchored discussions among 20 candidates at a Norwegian university and identifies two normative patterns: one privileging professional knowledge in general didactical discussions, and another privileging personalized knowledge and accepting vague arguments in mathematics-specific discussions. The study highlights the need to foster explicit and evidence-based reasoning in teacher education to enhance professional vision development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25002379\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25002379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师专业视野是教师专业能力的重要组成部分。本研究考察了教师候选人在讨论课堂谈话录像时的主体间框架过程如何支持他们的专业视野发展。受对话分析学习方法的启发,该研究分析了挪威一所大学的20名候选人的视频讨论,并确定了两种规范模式:一种是在一般教学讨论中优先考虑专业知识,另一种是优先考虑个性化知识,并接受数学特定讨论中的模糊论点。该研究强调了在教师教育中培养明确和循证推理的必要性,以促进专业视野的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing professional vision: Mathematics teacher candidates’ negotiation of knowledge when discussing model videos from classrooms
Teachers' professional vision is a key component of teachers' professional competence. This study examines how teacher candidates’ intersubjective framing processes when discussing video-recorded classroom talk support their professional vision development. Inspired by a conversation-analysis approach to learning, the study analyzes video-anchored discussions among 20 candidates at a Norwegian university and identifies two normative patterns: one privileging professional knowledge in general didactical discussions, and another privileging personalized knowledge and accepting vague arguments in mathematics-specific discussions. The study highlights the need to foster explicit and evidence-based reasoning in teacher education to enhance professional vision development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信