使用低成本传感器测量和不同的建模方法,研究多层房屋烹饪排放物中颗粒物的运输

Andrew B. Martin , Stephen M. Zimmerman , Liora E. Mael , Dustin Poppendieck , Delphine K. Farmer , Marina E. Vance
{"title":"使用低成本传感器测量和不同的建模方法,研究多层房屋烹饪排放物中颗粒物的运输","authors":"Andrew B. Martin ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Zimmerman ,&nbsp;Liora E. Mael ,&nbsp;Dustin Poppendieck ,&nbsp;Delphine K. Farmer ,&nbsp;Marina E. Vance","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work investigates the transport of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in a multi-story test house using cooking emissions as a point source. The test house was instrumented with 13 PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitors, and the particle sources included pan cooking and air frying, as well as ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> penetration during periods of no indoor activity. In the absence of indoor sources, we observed about 10 % of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations penetrating indoors with a time lag of ≈ 1 h. Similar peak PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were observed for pan frying and air frying of the same food ingredients. A cross-correlation analysis showed that it took 2–4 min for kitchen peak concentrations to reach other sensors on the first floor and about 8 min to reach the second floor. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were heterogeneous on the first floor, with non-kitchen areas peaking at 45 % ± 9 % of kitchen levels. Second-floor concentrations were more homogeneous, peaking at 18 % ± 2 % of kitchen levels. Using a typical occupancy scenario, the highest estimated personal PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure (44 %) was experienced in the kitchen/dining area, which accounted for 9 % of the time spent at home. We used three modeling approaches to analyze particle transport throughout the house, with increasing input requirements: a multi-box model, an empirical model, and the NIST CONTAM model. All models predicted time integrated PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations on the 1st and 2nd floors, with R<sup>2</sup> between 0.57 and 0.82 and RMSE from 6 µg m<sup>−3</sup> to 11 µg m<sup>−3</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating transport of particulate matter from cooking emissions in a multi-story house using low-cost sensor measurements and different modeling approaches\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B. Martin ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Zimmerman ,&nbsp;Liora E. Mael ,&nbsp;Dustin Poppendieck ,&nbsp;Delphine K. Farmer ,&nbsp;Marina E. Vance\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work investigates the transport of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in a multi-story test house using cooking emissions as a point source. The test house was instrumented with 13 PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitors, and the particle sources included pan cooking and air frying, as well as ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> penetration during periods of no indoor activity. In the absence of indoor sources, we observed about 10 % of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations penetrating indoors with a time lag of ≈ 1 h. Similar peak PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were observed for pan frying and air frying of the same food ingredients. A cross-correlation analysis showed that it took 2–4 min for kitchen peak concentrations to reach other sensors on the first floor and about 8 min to reach the second floor. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were heterogeneous on the first floor, with non-kitchen areas peaking at 45 % ± 9 % of kitchen levels. Second-floor concentrations were more homogeneous, peaking at 18 % ± 2 % of kitchen levels. Using a typical occupancy scenario, the highest estimated personal PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure (44 %) was experienced in the kitchen/dining area, which accounted for 9 % of the time spent at home. We used three modeling approaches to analyze particle transport throughout the house, with increasing input requirements: a multi-box model, an empirical model, and the NIST CONTAM model. All models predicted time integrated PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations on the 1st and 2nd floors, with R<sup>2</sup> between 0.57 and 0.82 and RMSE from 6 µg m<sup>−3</sup> to 11 µg m<sup>−3</sup>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362025000554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362025000554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作研究了细颗粒物(PM2.5)在多层试验屋中的运输,使用烹饪排放作为点源。试验室内安装了13个PM2.5监测仪,颗粒来源包括平底锅烹饪和空气煎炸,以及没有室内活动时的环境PM2.5渗透。在没有室内源的情况下,我们观察到约10% %的环境PM2.5浓度穿透室内,时间滞后约 1 h。同样的食材,在油锅煎炸和空气煎炸中观察到相似的PM2.5浓度峰值。相互关联分析表明,厨房峰值浓度到达一楼其他传感器需要2-4 min,到达二楼大约需要8 min。PM2.5浓度在一楼是不均匀的,非厨房区域的峰值为厨房水平的45 %±9 %。二楼的浓度更为均匀,峰值为厨房水平的18 %±2 %。在典型的居住情况下,厨房/用餐区的个人PM2.5暴露估计最高(44. %),占在家时间的9. %。我们使用了三种建模方法来分析随着输入要求的增加,粒子在整个房屋中的传输:多盒模型、经验模型和NIST CONTAM模型。所有模型都预测了1楼和2楼的PM2.5浓度,R2在0.57和0.82之间,RMSE在6 µg m - 3到11 µg m - 3之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating transport of particulate matter from cooking emissions in a multi-story house using low-cost sensor measurements and different modeling approaches
This work investigates the transport of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in a multi-story test house using cooking emissions as a point source. The test house was instrumented with 13 PM2.5 monitors, and the particle sources included pan cooking and air frying, as well as ambient PM2.5 penetration during periods of no indoor activity. In the absence of indoor sources, we observed about 10 % of ambient PM2.5 concentrations penetrating indoors with a time lag of ≈ 1 h. Similar peak PM2.5 concentrations were observed for pan frying and air frying of the same food ingredients. A cross-correlation analysis showed that it took 2–4 min for kitchen peak concentrations to reach other sensors on the first floor and about 8 min to reach the second floor. PM2.5 concentrations were heterogeneous on the first floor, with non-kitchen areas peaking at 45 % ± 9 % of kitchen levels. Second-floor concentrations were more homogeneous, peaking at 18 % ± 2 % of kitchen levels. Using a typical occupancy scenario, the highest estimated personal PM2.5 exposure (44 %) was experienced in the kitchen/dining area, which accounted for 9 % of the time spent at home. We used three modeling approaches to analyze particle transport throughout the house, with increasing input requirements: a multi-box model, an empirical model, and the NIST CONTAM model. All models predicted time integrated PM2.5 concentrations on the 1st and 2nd floors, with R2 between 0.57 and 0.82 and RMSE from 6 µg m−3 to 11 µg m−3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信