某蒸汽电厂烟气驱动的两个超临界CO2动力循环换热器的选型及运行经济性比较

Q1 Chemical Engineering
Animesh Goswami, T.K. Gogoi
{"title":"某蒸汽电厂烟气驱动的两个超临界CO2动力循环换热器的选型及运行经济性比较","authors":"Animesh Goswami,&nbsp;T.K. Gogoi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a thermo-fluid model of a sCO<sub>2</sub> recompression cycle (sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC) utilizing boiler flue gas of a reheat regenerative steam power plant (RRSPP) and presents exergoeconomic analysis. Two configurations are considered: Configuration 1 (C1) utilizes the exhaust heat first in an air preheater and next in an intermediate heat exchanger and in Configuration 2 (C2) the order is reversed. Key geometric specifications of the heat exchangers are determined alongside the performance parameters like pressure drop, heat transfer coefficients, etc. The net power output of the sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC in C2 is found to be 8.32 MW, compared to 2.31 MW in C1. Also, C2 has better thermal and exergy efficiencies of 28.91 % and 38.71 %. Previously, the standalone RRSPP incurred a total cost rate of 5,675.84 $/h against a net power of 205.8 MW. Now, with a surplus power of 2.31 MW and 8.32 MW obtained, respectively, from C1 and C2, the additional total cost rates associated with the combined RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2 are found to be 165.04 $/h and 59.33 $/h, respectively. The RRSPP-C2 produces 2.89 % more power with higher efficiencies and has the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) among the three systems—standalone RRSPP, RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2. Therefore, RRSPP-C2 is recommended for sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC operation together with the SPP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sizing of heat exchangers and exergoeconomic performance comparison of two supercritical CO2 power cycles driven by flue gas of a steam power plant\",\"authors\":\"Animesh Goswami,&nbsp;T.K. Gogoi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops a thermo-fluid model of a sCO<sub>2</sub> recompression cycle (sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC) utilizing boiler flue gas of a reheat regenerative steam power plant (RRSPP) and presents exergoeconomic analysis. Two configurations are considered: Configuration 1 (C1) utilizes the exhaust heat first in an air preheater and next in an intermediate heat exchanger and in Configuration 2 (C2) the order is reversed. Key geometric specifications of the heat exchangers are determined alongside the performance parameters like pressure drop, heat transfer coefficients, etc. The net power output of the sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC in C2 is found to be 8.32 MW, compared to 2.31 MW in C1. Also, C2 has better thermal and exergy efficiencies of 28.91 % and 38.71 %. Previously, the standalone RRSPP incurred a total cost rate of 5,675.84 $/h against a net power of 205.8 MW. Now, with a surplus power of 2.31 MW and 8.32 MW obtained, respectively, from C1 and C2, the additional total cost rates associated with the combined RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2 are found to be 165.04 $/h and 59.33 $/h, respectively. The RRSPP-C2 produces 2.89 % more power with higher efficiencies and has the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) among the three systems—standalone RRSPP, RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2. Therefore, RRSPP-C2 is recommended for sCO<sub>2</sub>-RC operation together with the SPP.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Thermofluids\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Thermofluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202725003829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202725003829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究建立了利用再热蓄热式蒸汽发电厂锅炉烟气进行sCO2再压缩循环(sCO2- rc)的热流体模型,并进行了运行经济性分析。考虑了两种配置:配置1 (C1)首先在空气预热器中利用废气热量,然后在中间热交换器中利用废气热量,在配置2 (C2)中顺序相反。确定了换热器的关键几何规格以及压降、换热系数等性能参数。C2中sCO2-RC的净输出功率为8.32 MW,而C1中的净输出功率为2.31 MW。C2的热效率和火用效率分别为28.91%和38.71%。此前,独立的RRSPP总成本为5,675.84美元/小时,净功率为205.8兆瓦。现在,从C1和C2分别获得了2.31兆瓦和8.32兆瓦的剩余功率,与RRSPP-C1和RRSPP-C2联合相关的额外总成本率分别为165.04美元/小时和59.33美元/小时。在独立的RRSPP、RRSPP- c1和RRSPP- c2三个系统中,RRSPP- c2以更高的效率多产生2.89%的功率,并且具有最低的平准化能源成本(LCOE)。因此,建议使用RRSPP-C2与SPP一起操作sCO2-RC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sizing of heat exchangers and exergoeconomic performance comparison of two supercritical CO2 power cycles driven by flue gas of a steam power plant
This study develops a thermo-fluid model of a sCO2 recompression cycle (sCO2-RC) utilizing boiler flue gas of a reheat regenerative steam power plant (RRSPP) and presents exergoeconomic analysis. Two configurations are considered: Configuration 1 (C1) utilizes the exhaust heat first in an air preheater and next in an intermediate heat exchanger and in Configuration 2 (C2) the order is reversed. Key geometric specifications of the heat exchangers are determined alongside the performance parameters like pressure drop, heat transfer coefficients, etc. The net power output of the sCO2-RC in C2 is found to be 8.32 MW, compared to 2.31 MW in C1. Also, C2 has better thermal and exergy efficiencies of 28.91 % and 38.71 %. Previously, the standalone RRSPP incurred a total cost rate of 5,675.84 $/h against a net power of 205.8 MW. Now, with a surplus power of 2.31 MW and 8.32 MW obtained, respectively, from C1 and C2, the additional total cost rates associated with the combined RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2 are found to be 165.04 $/h and 59.33 $/h, respectively. The RRSPP-C2 produces 2.89 % more power with higher efficiencies and has the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) among the three systems—standalone RRSPP, RRSPP-C1 and RRSPP-C2. Therefore, RRSPP-C2 is recommended for sCO2-RC operation together with the SPP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信