迈向更清洁的水域:微纳米塑料减缓方面的进展以及水生MNPs分析和管理方面的见解

IF 7.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
S. Shimly , N. Rasana , S. Rajendrakumar , K. Nithya
{"title":"迈向更清洁的水域:微纳米塑料减缓方面的进展以及水生MNPs分析和管理方面的见解","authors":"S. Shimly ,&nbsp;N. Rasana ,&nbsp;S. Rajendrakumar ,&nbsp;K. Nithya","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2025.119535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microplastics (MPs, 1 µm–5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs, &lt;1 µm) are increasingly detected in aquatic environments due to widespread plastic use and poor waste management. They pose a serious environmental threat, especially in aquatic environments, because of its persistence, ubiquity and ability to bioaccumulate. Micro-nanoplastics (MNPs) raise significant environmental and health concerns. Their small size, complex behavior and the interactions with other pollutants make their removal a global challenge. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of different removal and treatment methods spanning physical, chemical and biological methods. The study follows PRISMA methodology by systematically reviewing the existing literature and exploring key topics. Reported removal efficiencies vary widely across methods, with membrane filtration and coagulation–flocculation techniques achieving up to 98–99.99 % efficiency in certain laboratory studies. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have demonstrated removal rates between 50 % and 95 %, depending on operational parameters and MNP characteristics. Biological treatments, such as microbial and enzymatic degradation, show promise at the experimental scale, although their real-world application remains limited. In addition to removal technologies, the review highlights key challenges in MNP identification, quantification, and management. The findings emphasize that a combination of complementary approaches is more effective than single-method strategies. Future research should focus on bridging the gap between laboratory findings and field applicability, promoting sustainable technologies, and developing scalable, eco-friendly solutions to mitigate MNP pollution in aquatic environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 119535"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward cleaner waters: Advances in micro and nano plastics mitigation and insights in aquatic MNPs profiling and management\",\"authors\":\"S. Shimly ,&nbsp;N. Rasana ,&nbsp;S. Rajendrakumar ,&nbsp;K. Nithya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jece.2025.119535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Microplastics (MPs, 1 µm–5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs, &lt;1 µm) are increasingly detected in aquatic environments due to widespread plastic use and poor waste management. They pose a serious environmental threat, especially in aquatic environments, because of its persistence, ubiquity and ability to bioaccumulate. Micro-nanoplastics (MNPs) raise significant environmental and health concerns. Their small size, complex behavior and the interactions with other pollutants make their removal a global challenge. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of different removal and treatment methods spanning physical, chemical and biological methods. The study follows PRISMA methodology by systematically reviewing the existing literature and exploring key topics. Reported removal efficiencies vary widely across methods, with membrane filtration and coagulation–flocculation techniques achieving up to 98–99.99 % efficiency in certain laboratory studies. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have demonstrated removal rates between 50 % and 95 %, depending on operational parameters and MNP characteristics. Biological treatments, such as microbial and enzymatic degradation, show promise at the experimental scale, although their real-world application remains limited. In addition to removal technologies, the review highlights key challenges in MNP identification, quantification, and management. The findings emphasize that a combination of complementary approaches is more effective than single-method strategies. Future research should focus on bridging the gap between laboratory findings and field applicability, promoting sustainable technologies, and developing scalable, eco-friendly solutions to mitigate MNP pollution in aquatic environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 119535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343725042319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343725042319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于塑料的广泛使用和废物管理不善,在水生环境中越来越多地检测到微塑料(MPs, 1µm - 5 mm)和纳米塑料(NPs, 1µm)。由于其持久性、普遍性和生物积累能力,它们对环境构成严重威胁,特别是在水生环境中。微纳米塑料(MNPs)引起了重大的环境和健康问题。它们的体积小、行为复杂以及与其他污染物的相互作用使它们的清除成为一项全球性的挑战。本研究评估了不同的去除和处理方法的有效性,包括物理、化学和生物方法。本研究遵循PRISMA方法,系统地回顾现有文献并探索关键主题。不同方法的去除效率差异很大,在某些实验室研究中,膜过滤和混凝-絮凝技术的效率可达98-99.99 %。高级氧化工艺(AOPs)的去除率在50% %和95% %之间,具体取决于操作参数和MNP特性。生物处理,如微生物和酶降解,在实验规模上显示出希望,尽管它们的实际应用仍然有限。除了去除技术外,该综述还强调了MNP识别、量化和管理方面的关键挑战。研究结果强调,互补方法的组合比单一方法的策略更有效。未来的研究应侧重于弥合实验室研究结果与现场应用之间的差距,推广可持续技术,并开发可扩展的、生态友好的解决方案,以减轻水生环境中的MNP污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward cleaner waters: Advances in micro and nano plastics mitigation and insights in aquatic MNPs profiling and management
Microplastics (MPs, 1 µm–5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs, <1 µm) are increasingly detected in aquatic environments due to widespread plastic use and poor waste management. They pose a serious environmental threat, especially in aquatic environments, because of its persistence, ubiquity and ability to bioaccumulate. Micro-nanoplastics (MNPs) raise significant environmental and health concerns. Their small size, complex behavior and the interactions with other pollutants make their removal a global challenge. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of different removal and treatment methods spanning physical, chemical and biological methods. The study follows PRISMA methodology by systematically reviewing the existing literature and exploring key topics. Reported removal efficiencies vary widely across methods, with membrane filtration and coagulation–flocculation techniques achieving up to 98–99.99 % efficiency in certain laboratory studies. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have demonstrated removal rates between 50 % and 95 %, depending on operational parameters and MNP characteristics. Biological treatments, such as microbial and enzymatic degradation, show promise at the experimental scale, although their real-world application remains limited. In addition to removal technologies, the review highlights key challenges in MNP identification, quantification, and management. The findings emphasize that a combination of complementary approaches is more effective than single-method strategies. Future research should focus on bridging the gap between laboratory findings and field applicability, promoting sustainable technologies, and developing scalable, eco-friendly solutions to mitigate MNP pollution in aquatic environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
2017
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信