低密度(LDPE)和高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)微塑料微生物定植和降解的比较分析

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Luming Wang , Juan Huang , Jin Xu , Xuan Li , Haoqin Ma , Xiuwen Qian , Soroush Abolfathi
{"title":"低密度(LDPE)和高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)微塑料微生物定植和降解的比较分析","authors":"Luming Wang ,&nbsp;Juan Huang ,&nbsp;Jin Xu ,&nbsp;Xuan Li ,&nbsp;Haoqin Ma ,&nbsp;Xiuwen Qian ,&nbsp;Soroush Abolfathi","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global spread of microplastics (MPs) poses significant environmental risks, with polyethylene (PE) being the most common polymer found in ecosystems. While most research on MP contamination in agricultural soils focuses on pristine environments, microbial responses to PE-MPs under laboratory culture conditions with MPs as the sole carbon source remain poorly understood. This study examines the diversity, composition, and degradation potential of microbial communities colonizing low- and high-density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE). Microbial diversity was initially lowest on LDPE but increased significantly over time, whereas HDPE sustained higher initial diversity that remained stable throughout the culture. Proteobacteria dominated all samples, with key plastic-degrading taxa such as <em>Actinobacteriota</em> and <em>Bacteroidota</em> playing critical roles. Co-occurrence networks indicated more complex microbial interactions on LDPE, suggesting stronger ecological cooperation. Degradation performance differed between polymers: HDPE showed more consistent removal and structural modification, facilitated by functional strains such as <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> and <em>Bacillus proteolyticus</em>. These findings highlight how microbial community structure influences PE biodegradation and offer insights for bioremediation applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107956"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of microbial colonization and degradation of low-density (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) microplastics\",\"authors\":\"Luming Wang ,&nbsp;Juan Huang ,&nbsp;Jin Xu ,&nbsp;Xuan Li ,&nbsp;Haoqin Ma ,&nbsp;Xiuwen Qian ,&nbsp;Soroush Abolfathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global spread of microplastics (MPs) poses significant environmental risks, with polyethylene (PE) being the most common polymer found in ecosystems. While most research on MP contamination in agricultural soils focuses on pristine environments, microbial responses to PE-MPs under laboratory culture conditions with MPs as the sole carbon source remain poorly understood. This study examines the diversity, composition, and degradation potential of microbial communities colonizing low- and high-density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE). Microbial diversity was initially lowest on LDPE but increased significantly over time, whereas HDPE sustained higher initial diversity that remained stable throughout the culture. Proteobacteria dominated all samples, with key plastic-degrading taxa such as <em>Actinobacteriota</em> and <em>Bacteroidota</em> playing critical roles. Co-occurrence networks indicated more complex microbial interactions on LDPE, suggesting stronger ecological cooperation. Degradation performance differed between polymers: HDPE showed more consistent removal and structural modification, facilitated by functional strains such as <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> and <em>Bacillus proteolyticus</em>. These findings highlight how microbial community structure influences PE biodegradation and offer insights for bioremediation applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微塑料(MPs)的全球蔓延带来了重大的环境风险,聚乙烯(PE)是生态系统中最常见的聚合物。虽然大多数关于农业土壤中多聚物污染的研究都集中在原始环境中,但在实验室培养条件下,微生物对多聚物作为唯一碳源的PE-MPs的反应仍然知之甚少。本研究探讨了定殖在低密度聚乙烯和高密度聚乙烯(LDPE和HDPE)上的微生物群落的多样性、组成和降解潜力。微生物多样性最初在LDPE上最低,但随着时间的推移显著增加,而HDPE维持较高的初始多样性,并在整个培养过程中保持稳定。变形菌群在所有样品中占主导地位,其中关键的塑料降解类群如放线菌群和拟杆菌群起着关键作用。共现网络表明微生物在LDPE上的相互作用更为复杂,表明其生态合作关系更强。不同聚合物的降解性能不同:HDPE表现出更一致的去除和结构修饰,这是由功能性菌株如嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌和水解蛋白芽孢杆菌促进的。这些发现强调了微生物群落结构如何影响PE的生物降解,并为生物修复应用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of microbial colonization and degradation of low-density (LDPE) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) microplastics
The global spread of microplastics (MPs) poses significant environmental risks, with polyethylene (PE) being the most common polymer found in ecosystems. While most research on MP contamination in agricultural soils focuses on pristine environments, microbial responses to PE-MPs under laboratory culture conditions with MPs as the sole carbon source remain poorly understood. This study examines the diversity, composition, and degradation potential of microbial communities colonizing low- and high-density polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE). Microbial diversity was initially lowest on LDPE but increased significantly over time, whereas HDPE sustained higher initial diversity that remained stable throughout the culture. Proteobacteria dominated all samples, with key plastic-degrading taxa such as Actinobacteriota and Bacteroidota playing critical roles. Co-occurrence networks indicated more complex microbial interactions on LDPE, suggesting stronger ecological cooperation. Degradation performance differed between polymers: HDPE showed more consistent removal and structural modification, facilitated by functional strains such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Bacillus proteolyticus. These findings highlight how microbial community structure influences PE biodegradation and offer insights for bioremediation applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信