Yiduo Yao , Xin Zou , Yihui Zhang , Hengbo Guo , Jiyuan Xu , Yaman Boluk , Yang Liu
{"title":"高氨厌氧消化污泥上清处理两种反应器高宽比下悬浮污泥性能的比较评价","authors":"Yiduo Yao , Xin Zou , Yihui Zhang , Hengbo Guo , Jiyuan Xu , Yaman Boluk , Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative evaluation of two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with distinct height-to-width (H/W) ratios treating high-ammonia anaerobically digested sludge supernatant via the nitritation-denitritation process. The reactors were designed with constant volumes but differing H/W ratios, 4.8 for R1 and 2.8 for R2, while maintaining identical superficial gas velocity (SGV), to isolate the effects of reactor configuration. Both systems consistently achieved ∼99 % ammonium nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) removal throughout operation, with total inorganic nitrogen removal efficiencies of 95 % in R1 and 97 % in R2. Kinetic analysis revealed that R2 achieved higher microbial activity, with maximum AOB and denitritation activities of 0.57 and 6.32 g N/g VSS/d, respectively, compared to 0.49 and 5.12 g N/g VSS/d in R1. Conversely, R1 demonstrated better sludge settleability, with final SVI<sub>30</sub> values of 90 mL/g compared to 120 mL/g in R2. Microbial community profiling revealed comparable population structures in both reactors, with both systems dominated by the same key functional microorganisms: <em>Nitrosomonas</em> as the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and <em>Thauera</em> as the primary denitrifying bacteria. These findings indicate that while a lower H/W ratio enhances microbial activity and nitrogen removal, a higher H/W ratio improves sludge compaction and settling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107966"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of suspended sludge performance at two reactor height-to-width ratios for high-ammonia anaerobically digested sludge supernatant treatment\",\"authors\":\"Yiduo Yao , Xin Zou , Yihui Zhang , Hengbo Guo , Jiyuan Xu , Yaman Boluk , Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a comparative evaluation of two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with distinct height-to-width (H/W) ratios treating high-ammonia anaerobically digested sludge supernatant via the nitritation-denitritation process. The reactors were designed with constant volumes but differing H/W ratios, 4.8 for R1 and 2.8 for R2, while maintaining identical superficial gas velocity (SGV), to isolate the effects of reactor configuration. Both systems consistently achieved ∼99 % ammonium nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) removal throughout operation, with total inorganic nitrogen removal efficiencies of 95 % in R1 and 97 % in R2. Kinetic analysis revealed that R2 achieved higher microbial activity, with maximum AOB and denitritation activities of 0.57 and 6.32 g N/g VSS/d, respectively, compared to 0.49 and 5.12 g N/g VSS/d in R1. Conversely, R1 demonstrated better sludge settleability, with final SVI<sub>30</sub> values of 90 mL/g compared to 120 mL/g in R2. Microbial community profiling revealed comparable population structures in both reactors, with both systems dominated by the same key functional microorganisms: <em>Nitrosomonas</em> as the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and <em>Thauera</em> as the primary denitrifying bacteria. These findings indicate that while a lower H/W ratio enhances microbial activity and nitrogen removal, a higher H/W ratio improves sludge compaction and settling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012339\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究对两种不同高宽比(H/W)的序批式反应器(sbr)通过亚硝化-反硝化工艺处理高氨厌氧消化污泥上清液进行了比较评价。反应器采用定体积设计,但H/W比不同,R1为4.8,R2为2.8,同时保持相同的表面气速(SGV),以隔离反应器配置的影响。在整个操作过程中,两种系统都能稳定地实现~ 99 %的铵态氮(NH4+-N)去除率,R1和R2的总无机氮去除率分别为95 %和97 %。动力学分析表明,R2具有更高的微生物活性,最大AOB和反硝化活性分别为0.57和6.32 g N/g VSS/d,而R1为0.49和5.12 g N/g VSS/d。相反,R1表现出更好的污泥沉降性,最终SVI30值为90 mL/g,而R2为120 mL/g。微生物群落分析显示,两个反应器的种群结构相似,两个系统都由相同的关键功能微生物主导:亚硝化单胞菌是主要的氨氧化细菌(AOB), Thauera是主要的反硝化细菌。这些结果表明,较低的H/W比可以提高微生物活性和氮的去除,而较高的H/W比可以提高污泥的压实和沉降。
Comparative evaluation of suspended sludge performance at two reactor height-to-width ratios for high-ammonia anaerobically digested sludge supernatant treatment
This study presents a comparative evaluation of two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with distinct height-to-width (H/W) ratios treating high-ammonia anaerobically digested sludge supernatant via the nitritation-denitritation process. The reactors were designed with constant volumes but differing H/W ratios, 4.8 for R1 and 2.8 for R2, while maintaining identical superficial gas velocity (SGV), to isolate the effects of reactor configuration. Both systems consistently achieved ∼99 % ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) removal throughout operation, with total inorganic nitrogen removal efficiencies of 95 % in R1 and 97 % in R2. Kinetic analysis revealed that R2 achieved higher microbial activity, with maximum AOB and denitritation activities of 0.57 and 6.32 g N/g VSS/d, respectively, compared to 0.49 and 5.12 g N/g VSS/d in R1. Conversely, R1 demonstrated better sludge settleability, with final SVI30 values of 90 mL/g compared to 120 mL/g in R2. Microbial community profiling revealed comparable population structures in both reactors, with both systems dominated by the same key functional microorganisms: Nitrosomonas as the predominant ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and Thauera as the primary denitrifying bacteria. These findings indicate that while a lower H/W ratio enhances microbial activity and nitrogen removal, a higher H/W ratio improves sludge compaction and settling.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.