{"title":"风向和街道长度对理想街道峡谷中污染物扩散和行人暴露的综合影响:CFD方法","authors":"Namrata Mishra , Aditya Kumar Patra , Abhishek Penchala","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study numerically examines the combined effects of wind direction and street length on pollutant dispersion, ventilation, and pedestrian-level exposure in urban street canyons. Idealized symmetric, step-up, and step-down canyon configurations with aspect ratios (<em>AR</em> = 1, 3) and street lengths (<em>L/W</em> = 2–20) were analyzed under four wind directions (α = 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Ventilation performance was evaluated using dimensionless air exchange rate (<em>ACH∗</em>) and pedestrian net escape velocity (<em>NEV</em><sub><em>ped</em></sub><em>∗</em>), while exposure was quantified through intake fraction (<<em>P_IF</em>>). Results show that symmetric canyons accumulate the highest pollutant concentrations under parallel winds (α = 0°), while step-up and step-down canyons show peak levels under oblique and perpendicular winds, respectively. Ventilation efficiency is highest in symmetric and step-down canyons under oblique winds (α = 30°–60°), and in step-up canyons under perpendicular winds (α = 90°). The lowest <<em>P_IF</em>> occurs under oblique, parallel, and perpendicular winds for symmetric, step-down, and step-up canyons, respectively. Longer streets generally reduce ventilation and increase <<em>P_IF</em>>, particularly under α = 0°. However, step-down canyons with AR = 3 demonstrate improved ventilation for <em>L/W</em> > 10 under α = 30°–90°. These findings offer practical insights for optimizing canyon geometries to enhance urban air quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 106247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated influence of wind direction and street length on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian exposure in idealized street canyons: A CFD approach\",\"authors\":\"Namrata Mishra , Aditya Kumar Patra , Abhishek Penchala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study numerically examines the combined effects of wind direction and street length on pollutant dispersion, ventilation, and pedestrian-level exposure in urban street canyons. Idealized symmetric, step-up, and step-down canyon configurations with aspect ratios (<em>AR</em> = 1, 3) and street lengths (<em>L/W</em> = 2–20) were analyzed under four wind directions (α = 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Ventilation performance was evaluated using dimensionless air exchange rate (<em>ACH∗</em>) and pedestrian net escape velocity (<em>NEV</em><sub><em>ped</em></sub><em>∗</em>), while exposure was quantified through intake fraction (<<em>P_IF</em>>). Results show that symmetric canyons accumulate the highest pollutant concentrations under parallel winds (α = 0°), while step-up and step-down canyons show peak levels under oblique and perpendicular winds, respectively. Ventilation efficiency is highest in symmetric and step-down canyons under oblique winds (α = 30°–60°), and in step-up canyons under perpendicular winds (α = 90°). The lowest <<em>P_IF</em>> occurs under oblique, parallel, and perpendicular winds for symmetric, step-down, and step-up canyons, respectively. Longer streets generally reduce ventilation and increase <<em>P_IF</em>>, particularly under α = 0°. However, step-down canyons with AR = 3 demonstrate improved ventilation for <em>L/W</em> > 10 under α = 30°–90°. These findings offer practical insights for optimizing canyon geometries to enhance urban air quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525002430\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525002430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated influence of wind direction and street length on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian exposure in idealized street canyons: A CFD approach
This study numerically examines the combined effects of wind direction and street length on pollutant dispersion, ventilation, and pedestrian-level exposure in urban street canyons. Idealized symmetric, step-up, and step-down canyon configurations with aspect ratios (AR = 1, 3) and street lengths (L/W = 2–20) were analyzed under four wind directions (α = 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Ventilation performance was evaluated using dimensionless air exchange rate (ACH∗) and pedestrian net escape velocity (NEVped∗), while exposure was quantified through intake fraction (<P_IF>). Results show that symmetric canyons accumulate the highest pollutant concentrations under parallel winds (α = 0°), while step-up and step-down canyons show peak levels under oblique and perpendicular winds, respectively. Ventilation efficiency is highest in symmetric and step-down canyons under oblique winds (α = 30°–60°), and in step-up canyons under perpendicular winds (α = 90°). The lowest <P_IF> occurs under oblique, parallel, and perpendicular winds for symmetric, step-down, and step-up canyons, respectively. Longer streets generally reduce ventilation and increase <P_IF>, particularly under α = 0°. However, step-down canyons with AR = 3 demonstrate improved ventilation for L/W > 10 under α = 30°–90°. These findings offer practical insights for optimizing canyon geometries to enhance urban air quality.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects.
Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.