探索利益相关者采用替代家禽饲料的意愿:来自尼泊尔的见解

IF 5.3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Karishma Subedi , Ujjal Tiwari , Sushmita Bhatta , Himal Luitel , Jorunn Grande , Lars Molden , Prabhat Khanal
{"title":"探索利益相关者采用替代家禽饲料的意愿:来自尼泊尔的见解","authors":"Karishma Subedi ,&nbsp;Ujjal Tiwari ,&nbsp;Sushmita Bhatta ,&nbsp;Himal Luitel ,&nbsp;Jorunn Grande ,&nbsp;Lars Molden ,&nbsp;Prabhat Khanal","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The notion of alternative feed sources is novel to Nepali farmers. There are no prior studies assessing the perception and readiness of stakeholders, including farmers and feed companies, in the poultry production sector to accept alternative feed sources. This study examines the perceptions of stakeholders involved in poultry production, the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt alternative feed sources, and their intention to produce such feed sources. Randomly selected 196 farmers and 23 feed companies were surveyed in 2023 in the Chitwan district, the hub of the Nepalese poultry business. Data analysis involved the use of descriptive statistics and binary logit regression. Findings revealed that 62.8 % of respondent farmers and all the feed companies had a positive perception of alternative feed sources, with 51.5 % of farmers and 43.5 % of feed companies being willing to accept them. However, only 13.8 % of farmers and 21.7 % of feed companies intended to produce these sources. Education (p &lt; 0.05), perception (p &lt; 0.01), and farm economic performance (p &lt; 0.01) significantly influence farmers' willingness to accept alternative feed sources. Altogether, stakeholders in poultry production are generally willing to adopt alternative poultry feeds, but producing alternative feed on their own would be expectedly challenging due to the demands for knowledge and investment in infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring stakeholder willingness to adopt alternative poultry feeds: Insights from Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Karishma Subedi ,&nbsp;Ujjal Tiwari ,&nbsp;Sushmita Bhatta ,&nbsp;Himal Luitel ,&nbsp;Jorunn Grande ,&nbsp;Lars Molden ,&nbsp;Prabhat Khanal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The notion of alternative feed sources is novel to Nepali farmers. There are no prior studies assessing the perception and readiness of stakeholders, including farmers and feed companies, in the poultry production sector to accept alternative feed sources. This study examines the perceptions of stakeholders involved in poultry production, the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt alternative feed sources, and their intention to produce such feed sources. Randomly selected 196 farmers and 23 feed companies were surveyed in 2023 in the Chitwan district, the hub of the Nepalese poultry business. Data analysis involved the use of descriptive statistics and binary logit regression. Findings revealed that 62.8 % of respondent farmers and all the feed companies had a positive perception of alternative feed sources, with 51.5 % of farmers and 43.5 % of feed companies being willing to accept them. However, only 13.8 % of farmers and 21.7 % of feed companies intended to produce these sources. Education (p &lt; 0.05), perception (p &lt; 0.01), and farm economic performance (p &lt; 0.01) significantly influence farmers' willingness to accept alternative feed sources. Altogether, stakeholders in poultry production are generally willing to adopt alternative poultry feeds, but producing alternative feed on their own would be expectedly challenging due to the demands for knowledge and investment in infrastructure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784325000890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784325000890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

替代饲料来源的概念对尼泊尔农民来说是新鲜的。此前没有研究评估家禽生产部门的利益相关者(包括农民和饲料公司)接受替代饲料来源的认知和准备情况。本研究考察了参与家禽生产的利益相关者的看法,影响农民采用替代饲料来源意愿的因素,以及他们生产这种饲料来源的意愿。该研究于2023年在尼泊尔家禽业中心奇旺地区随机抽取了196名农民和23家饲料公司进行调查。数据分析包括使用描述性统计和二元logit回归。调查结果显示,62.8%的受访农民和所有饲料公司对替代饲料来源持积极态度,51.5%的农民和43.5%的饲料公司愿意接受替代饲料来源。然而,只有13.8%的农民和21.7%的饲料公司打算生产这些来源。教育(p < 0.05)、认知(p < 0.01)和农场经济绩效(p < 0.01)显著影响农民接受替代饲料来源的意愿。总之,家禽生产的利益相关者通常愿意采用替代家禽饲料,但由于对知识和基础设施投资的需求,自行生产替代饲料预计将具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring stakeholder willingness to adopt alternative poultry feeds: Insights from Nepal
The notion of alternative feed sources is novel to Nepali farmers. There are no prior studies assessing the perception and readiness of stakeholders, including farmers and feed companies, in the poultry production sector to accept alternative feed sources. This study examines the perceptions of stakeholders involved in poultry production, the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt alternative feed sources, and their intention to produce such feed sources. Randomly selected 196 farmers and 23 feed companies were surveyed in 2023 in the Chitwan district, the hub of the Nepalese poultry business. Data analysis involved the use of descriptive statistics and binary logit regression. Findings revealed that 62.8 % of respondent farmers and all the feed companies had a positive perception of alternative feed sources, with 51.5 % of farmers and 43.5 % of feed companies being willing to accept them. However, only 13.8 % of farmers and 21.7 % of feed companies intended to produce these sources. Education (p < 0.05), perception (p < 0.01), and farm economic performance (p < 0.01) significantly influence farmers' willingness to accept alternative feed sources. Altogether, stakeholders in poultry production are generally willing to adopt alternative poultry feeds, but producing alternative feed on their own would be expectedly challenging due to the demands for knowledge and investment in infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信