{"title":"各国在全球数字服务贸易中的网络地位如何影响碳排放:社会网络视角","authors":"Zhen Liu , Hua Li , Yuchen Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 511-528"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do countries’ network positions in global digital service trade affect carbon emissions: a social network perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Liu , Hua Li , Yuchen Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 511-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How do countries’ network positions in global digital service trade affect carbon emissions: a social network perspective
While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.
期刊介绍:
Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.