各国在全球数字服务贸易中的网络地位如何影响碳排放:社会网络视角

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zhen Liu , Hua Li , Yuchen Pan
{"title":"各国在全球数字服务贸易中的网络地位如何影响碳排放:社会网络视角","authors":"Zhen Liu ,&nbsp;Hua Li ,&nbsp;Yuchen Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 511-528"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do countries’ network positions in global digital service trade affect carbon emissions: a social network perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Liu ,&nbsp;Hua Li ,&nbsp;Yuchen Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 511-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625003704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然全球数字服务贸易的生态效益得到了广泛认可,但很少有研究探讨各国在全球数字服务贸易网络中的网络地位与碳排放之间的关系。本研究通过假设全球数字服务贸易的复杂网络结构,并调查一个国家的网络位置对其碳排放的影响,解决了这一差距。通过借鉴社会网络分析框架,确定了中心性和结构空洞的关键指标,以衡量一个国家的网络地位。研究发现,在规模效应、能源结构效应和技术效应的中介作用下,一国网络位置与其碳排放呈显著负相关。异质性分析证实了这种关系在经合组织和非经合组织经济体中的稳健性。从区域来看,中心性的增强减少了美洲、非洲和亚洲-大洋洲国家的排放,而欧洲则受益于结构性漏洞的中介能力。从行业来看,中向性驱动的减排在电信、计算机和信息行业占主导地位,而结构性漏洞在知识产权和其他商业领域的使用中更为有效。这些见解促进了学术理解,并为利用数字贸易网络实现脱碳目标的政策提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do countries’ network positions in global digital service trade affect carbon emissions: a social network perspective
While the ecological benefits of global digital service trade are widely acknowledged, few studies have explored the relationship between countries’ network positions in global digital service trade network and carbon emissions. This study addresses this gap by assuming the complex network structure of the global digital service trade and investigating the impact of a country’s network position on its carbon emissions. By drawing on the social network analysis framework, the key indicators of centrality and structural hole are identified to gauge a country’s network position. Our findings reveal a significant negative association between a country’ network position and its carbon emissions, mediated by scale effect, energy structure effect, and technology effect. Heterogeneity analyses confirm this relationship’ robustness across both OECD and non-OECD economies. Regionally, enhanced centrality reduces emissions in the Americas, Africa, and Asia-Oceanian nations, while Europe benefits from structural holes’ brokerage capabilities. Sectorally, centrality-driven emission reductions dominate telecommunications, computing, and information industry, whereas structural holes prove more effective in the use of intellectual property and other business sectors. These insights advance scholarly understanding and inform policies for leveraging digital trade networks toward decarbonization goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信